Bramsen, Jens-Martin (2008): A pseudo-endowment effect in internet auctions.
Download (186kB) | Preview
Although bidders in an internet auction do not obtain the actual ownership of the item during the auction, they still act according to an endowment eﬀect. In a unique data set of 17,000 Danish furniture auctions I ﬁnd that having the leading bid, both in terms of time and dollars, will aﬀect the bidders probability to rebid if outbid. Thus, expectations to own, i.e. “pseudo-endowment ”, seem to aﬀect bidders’ willingness to pay in a relative fast and straightforward manor. Gener- ally, these data therefore support that the reference point, from which we measure losses and gains, is closely related to expectations.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||A pseudo-endowment effect in internet auctions|
|Keywords:||Internet auctions, Reference-Dependent Preferences, Endowment Eﬀect, bidding behavior, eBay, WTP, Reference Point|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions
D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D01 - Microeconomic Behavior: Underlying Principles
D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design
|Depositing User:||Jens-Martin Bramsen|
|Date Deposited:||24. Apr 2009 00:51|
|Last Modified:||03. May 2015 18:50|
Ariely, D., Heyman, J. and Orhun, Y.: 2004, Auction fever: The eﬀect of opponents and the quasi-endowment on product valuations, Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(4).
Ariely, D., Koszegi, B., Mazar, N. and Shampan’er, K.: 2004, Price sensitive preferences, Working Paper, Department of Economics, UC Berkeley .
Ariely, D. and Simonsen, I.: 2003, Buying, bidding, playing or competing? value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions, Journal of Consumer Psychology 13, 113–123.
Bramsen, J.: 2007, Loss aversion in online auctions, Working Paper, Insti- tute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen .
Bramsen, J.-M.: 2008, Bid early and get it cheap - timing eﬀects in inter- net auctions, Working Paper, Institute of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen .
Carmon, Z., Wertenbroch, K. and Zeelenberg, M.: 2003, Option attachment: When deliberation makes choosing feel like losing, Journal of Consumer Research 30.
Frederick, S. and Loewenstein, G.: 1999, Hedonic adaptation, in D. Kahne- man, E. Diener and N. Schwartz (eds), Wel l-Being: The foundations of Hedonic Psychology, Rusell Sage Foundation.
Kahneman, D.: 2003, Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behav- ioral economics, The American Economic Review 93(5), 1449–1475.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L. and Thaler, R. H.: 1990, Experimental tests of the endowment eﬀect and the coase theorem, The Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 1325–1348.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A.: 1979, Prospect theory: An analy- sis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47(2), 263–91.
Koszegi, B. and Rabin, M.: 2006, A model of reference-dependent preferences, Quarterly Journal of Economics 121, 1133–1165.
Lee, H. and Malmendier, U.: 2006, The bidder’s curse, Working Paper, Stanford University.
List, J. A.: 2003, Does market experience eliminate market anomalies?, Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 41–71.
Prelec, D.: 1990, A ”pseudo-endowment” eﬀect and its implications for some recent nonexpected utility models, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3, 247–259.
Sen, S. and Johnson, E. J.: 1997, Mere-possesion eﬀects without possession in consumer choice, The Journal of Consumer Research 24(1), 105–117.