Miao, Jianjun and Wang, Pengfei (2009): Does Lumy Investment Matter for Business Cycles?
Download (294Kb) | Preview
We present an analytically tractable general equilibrium business cycle model that features micro-level investment lumpiness. We prove an exact irrelevance proposition which provides sufficient conditions on preferences, technology, and the fixed cost distribution such that any positive upper support of the fixed cost distribution yields identical equilibrium dynamics of the aggregate quantities normalized by their deterministic steady state values. We also give two conditions for the fixed cost distribution, under which lumpy investment can be important to a first-order approximation: (i) The steady-state elasticity of the adjustment rate is large so that the extensive margin effect is large. (ii) More mass is on low fixed costs so that the general equilibrium price feedback effect is small. Our theoretical results may reconcile some debate and some numerical findings in the literature.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Does Lumy Investment Matter for Business Cycles?|
|Keywords:||generalized (S,s) rule, lumpy investment, general equilibrium, business cycles, marginal Q, exact irrelevance proposition|
|Subjects:||E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations; Cycles
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Macroeconomics: Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment > E22 - Capital; Investment; Capacity
|Depositing User:||Jianjun Miao|
|Date Deposited:||02. May 2009 16:13|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 11:06|
Abel, Andrew B. and Janice C. Eberly, 1996, "Optimal investment with costly irreversibility," Review of Economic Studies 63, 581-593.
Abel, Andrew B. and Janice C. Eberly, 1998, "The Mix and Scale of Factors with Irreversibility and Fixed Costs of Investment," in Bennett McCallum and Charles Plosser (eds.) Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 48, 101-135.
Bachmann, Ruediger; Caballero, Ricardo, and Engel, Eduardo. 2008. "Aggregate Implications of Lumpy Investment: New Evidence and a DSGE Model." NBER working paper No. 12336.
Baxter, Marianne and Mario J. Crucini, 1993, "Explaining Saving-Investment Correlations," American Economic Review 83, 416-436.
Caballero, Ricardo and Engel, Eduardo. 1999. "Explaining Investment Dynamics in U.S. Manufacturing: A Generalized (S,s) Approach." Econometrica, 67(4), pp. 783-826.
Caballero, Ricardo; Engel, Eduardo and Haltiwanger, John. 1995. "Plant-Level Adjustment and Aggregate Investment Dynamics." Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1995, No. 2, pp. 1-54.
Caballero, Ricardo, and Leahy, John V. 1996. "Fixed Costs: The Demise of Marginal q." NBER working paper No. 5508.
Cooper, Russell and Haltiwanger, John. 2006. "On the Nature of Capital Adjustment Costs." Review of Economic Studies, 73, pp. 611-634.
Cooper, Russell, Haltiwanger, John and Power, Laura. 1999. "Machine Replacement and the Business Cycle: Lumps and Bumps." American Economic Review 89, 921-946.
Doms, Mark and Dunne, Timothy. 1998. "Capital Adjustment Patterns in Manufacturing Plants." Review of Economic Dynamics, 1, pp. 409-429.
Dotsey, M.; King, R. and Wolman, A. 1999. "State Dependent Pricing and the General Equilibrium Dynamics of Money and Output," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 655-690.
Fisher, Jonas D.M. 2006. "The Dynamic Effects of Neutral and Investment-Specific Technology Shocks." Journal of Political Economy, June 2006, 114(3), pp. 413-452.
Gourio, Francois and Kashyap, Anil. 2007. "Investment Spikes: New Facts and a General Equilibrium Exploration." Journal of Monetary Economics, 54: Supplement 1, pp. 1-22.
Greenwood, J., Hercowitz, Z., and P. Krusell, 2000, "The role of investment-specific technological change in the business cycle," European Economic Review 44, 91-115.
Hayashi, Fumio. 1982. "Tobin's Marginal q and Average q: A Neoclassical Interpretation." Econometrica. 50, January, pp. 213-224.
House, Christopher L., 2008, "Fixed Costs and Long-Lived Investments," working paper, University of Michigan.
Jermann, Urban J., 1998, "Asset Pricing in Production Economies," Journal of Monetary Economics 41, 257-275.
Khan, Aubhik and Thomas, Julia. 2003. "Nonconvex Factor Adjustments in Equilibrium Business Cycle Models: Do Nonlinearities Matter?" Journal of Monetary Economics, 50, pp. 331-360.
Khan, Aubhik and Thomas, Julia. 2008. "Idiosyncratic Shocks and the Role of Nonconvexities in Plant and Aggregate Investment Dynamics." Econometrica, 76(2), pp. 395-436.
King, Robert G., Charles I. Plosser, and Sergio T. Rebelo, 2002, "Production, Growth and Business Cycles: Technical Appendix," Computational Economics 20, 87-116.
Krusell, P., and Smith, A. 1998. "Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the Macroeconomy." Journal of Political Economy 106, 867-898.
Miao, Jianjun, 2008, "Corporate Tax Policy and Long-Run Capital Formation: The Role of Irreversibility and Fixed Costs," working paper, Boston University.
Prescott, Edward C., 1986, "Theory Ahead of Business Cycle Measurement," Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review 10, 9-22.
Stock, James H., Mark W. Watson, 1999, Business cycle fluctuations in U.S. macroeconomic time series. In: Woodford, M., Taylor, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Macroeconomics IA. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 3--64.
Thomas, Julia. 2002. "Is Lumpy Investment Relevant for the Business Cycle?" Journal of Political Economy, 110, 508-534.
Uzawa, Hirofumi, 1969, "Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth," Journal of Political Economy 77, 628-52.
Veracierto, Marcelo. L. 2002. "Plant-Level Irreversible Investment and Equilibrium Business Cycles." American Economic Review, 92, 181-197.
Wang, Pengfei and Yi Wen, 2009, "Financial Deveolpment and Economic Volatility: A Unified Explanation," working paper, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.