HASAN, HAMID (2009): Capabilities measurement: an empirical investigation.
Download (602kB) | Preview
Sen’s seminal contribution highlights the importance of positive freedom in the measurement of human welfare. The present paper attempts to measure this freedom aspect in an integrated approach. The main contribution of the paper is the simultaneous estimation of capability, functioning, and conversion efficiency with explicit modeling of freedom by latent variable modeling approach. The knowledge dimension of capabilities is modeled and estimated by integrating exploratory and confirmatory statistical methods in a two-stage procedure. In the first stage, Partial Least Squares method is employed to construct latent variable scores. These scores are transformed to relative scores for the sake of comparison and then used to estimate the proposed simultaneous-equation capability model by 3SLS in the second stage. The results show that capability is inversely related to resources and positively related to freedom and functioning. The computed relative capability and freedom inequality ratios are very high whereas relative functioning and efficiency inequality ratios are at a moderate level. The conventional income inequality ratio is lower as compared to the capability dimensions’ ratios and close to the Gini-coefficient. The paper extended the measurement of conversion inefficiency into voluntary and involuntary inefficiency. The paper also suggests criteria for evaluating empirical research within the capability approach framework. The paper recommends development of specific survey instruments in order to create better indicators for capability dimensions and use of latent variable modeling for constructing latent variable scores, and their subsequent use in estimation. These findings suggest a capabilities-oriented public and education policies for the enhancement of knowledge dimension of capabilities in particular and human welfare in general. The focus of education policy should be extended from investment oriented (human capital approach) to value-oriented (human capability approach).
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Capabilities measurement: an empirical investigation|
|English Title:||Capabilities measurement: an empirical investigation|
|Keywords:||Capabilities; Freedom; Functioning; Conversion Efficiency; Latent variables; Structural equations model; PLS; LISREL; 3SLS|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I31 - General Welfare
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables
|Depositing User:||HAMID HASAN|
|Date Deposited:||12. Aug 2009 07:02|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 00:43|
Alkire, S. (2005). Measuring freedom aspects of capabilities.
_______. (2007). Measuring Agency: Issues and Possibilities. Indian Journal of Human Development, 1(1).
Anand, P., Hunter, G., Carter, I., Dowding, K., Guala, F., and Hees, M., (2005).The Measurement of Human Capabilities. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/37/38363699.pdf
Anand, P., and Hees, M. (2006). Capabilities and achievements: An empirical study, Journal of Socio Economics, 35, 268-284.
Arif, G.M., Ali, M. S., Nasir, Z.M., Arshad, N. (2001). An Introduction to the 1998-99 Pakistan Socio-Economic Survey (PSES). MIMAP Technical paper series no. 4. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Atkinson, A.B. (1999). The Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2). p.173-190.
Arrow, Kenneth. (1999). Amartya K. Sen’s Contributions to the Study of Social Welfare, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2).p.163-172.
Binder, M. and Broekel, T. (2008). Conversion Efficiency as a complementing measure of welfare in capability space. MPRA.
Bollen, Kenneth, A. (2002). Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences. Annual Review Psychology, 53, 605-34.
Bro, R. and Elden, L. (2009). PLS works. Journal of Chemometrics, 23 (2). 69-71.
Comim, F., Qizilbash, M., and Alkire, S. (ed.) (2008). The Capability Approach- Concepts, Measures, and Applications. Cambridge University Press.
Hammer, A. (2006). Enabling Successful Supply Chain Management –Coordination, Collaboration, and Integration for Competitive Advantage, Doctoral Thesis. University of Mannheim.
Huber, P., E. Ronchetti, and M.-P. Victoria-Feser (2004). Estimation of generalized latent trait models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 66, 893—908.
Jensen, U. (2000). Is it efficient to analyse efficiency rankings? Empirical Economics, 25: 189-208.
Kementa, J. (1991). Latent Variables in Econometrics. Statistica Neerlandica. 45(2). 73- 84.
Kuklys, W. (2005). Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach-Theoretical Insights and Empirical Applications. Springer, Berlin et al.
Kumbhakar, S.C., and Lovell, C.A. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. CUP.
Olsson, Ulf. (1979). Maximum Likelihood Estimation of the Polychoric Correlation Coefficient. Psychometrika, 44 (4).
Pressman, S, and Summerfield, G. (2000). The Economic Contributions of Amartya Sen. Review of Political Economy, 12(1).
Robeyns, I. (2005). The Capability Approach: a theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1): 93-117.
Ryan, R. M. and Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, January 2000.
Sen, A. K. (1987). The Standard of Living. CUP.
_________(1985). Commodities and Capabilities. North-Holland. 23
_________(2002). Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
________ (2001). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
_________(1990). Justice: means versus freedoms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 19(2).
________ (1992).Inequality reexamined, Oxford, OUP.
_________(1984).Resources, Values and Development, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
_________(2004). Elements of a Theory of Human Rights. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 32(4).
_________(2002). Sen and Capabilities. Review of Political Economy, 14(4).
Siddiqui, R., and Hamid, S. (2003). Correlates of Poverty: Gender Dimensions. Final report. Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad, Pakistan.