Arribas, Iván and Pérez, Francisco and Tortosa-Ausina, Emili (2009): The distance puzzle revisited: a new interpretation based on geographic neutrality. Published in: Fundación BBVA - Documentos de Trabajo , Vol. 16, (2009)
Download (271kB) | Preview
One of the most remarkable features of globalization is the boost undergone by international trade triggered off by advances in technology that have contributed to reduce the cost of trade (e.g., transportation and communication costs). Under these circumstances, the importance of distance should have diminished over time, which would constitute a boon for countries located far from the main centers of economic activity. However, one of the best-established empirical results in international economics is that bilateral trade decreases with distance. This apparent contradiction has been labeled as the “missing globalization puzzle”. We propose yet another explanation to this apparent contradiction based on the concept of geographic neutrality, which we use to construct international trade integration indicators for two different scenarios, namely, when distance matters and when it does not. Our results indicate that the importance of distance varies greatly across countries, as revealed by disparate gaps between distance-corrected and distance-uncorrected trade integration indicators for different countries. Some factors rooted in the literature explain away the discrepancies, but their importance varies according to the trade integration indicator considered —trade openness or trade connection.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||The distance puzzle revisited: a new interpretation based on geographic neutrality|
|Keywords:||Geographic Neutrality, Globalization, Gravity Models, Network Analysis, Remoteness|
|Subjects:||F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration
F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order
Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics; Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Social and Economic Stratification
|Depositing User:||Francisco Pérez|
|Date Deposited:||12. Dec 2009 07:02|
|Last Modified:||18. Feb 2013 21:33|
Alberto Alesina and Enrico Spolaore. On the number and size of nations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112:1027-56, 1997.
J. E. Anderson and E. van Wincoop. Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle. The American Economic Review, 93(1):170-192, 2003.
K. Annen. Social capital, inclusive networks, and economic performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 50:449-463, 2003.
Iván Arribas and Francisco Pérez and Emili Tortosa-Ausina. Measuring globalization of international trade: Theory and evidence. World Development, 37(1):127-145, 2009.
Balassa, B. Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage. The Manchester School, 33(2):99-123, 1965.
Matias Berthelon and Caroline Freund. On the conservation of distance in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 75:310-320, 2008.
J. Brun and C. Carrere and P. Gillaumont and J. de Melo. Has distance died? Evidence from a panel gravity model. World Bank Economic Review, 19:99-120, 2005.
Natalie Chen and Jean Imbs and Andrew Scott. The dynamics of trade and competition. Journal of International Economics, 77(1):50-62, 2009.
David T. Coe and Arvind Subramanian and Natalia T. Tamirisa. The missing globalization puzzle: Evidence of the declining importance of distance. IMF Staff Papers, 54(1):34-58, 2007.
David T. Coe and Arvind Subramanian and Natalia T. Tamirisa and Rikhil Bhavnani. The missing globalization puzzle. Working Paper, 02/171, IMF, Washington, 2002.
A.C. Disdier and K. Head. The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90:37-48, 2008.
Jeffrey A. Frankel. Globalization of the economy. Working Paper, 7858, NBER, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2000.
Robert Hanneman and Mark Riddle. Introduction to Social Network Methods. Technical report, University of California at Riverside, Department of Sociology, 2005.
Keith Head and Thierry Mayer. Illusory border effects: distance mismeasurement inflates estimates of home bias in trade. Working Paper, 01, CEPII, Paris, 2002.
David Hummels. Have interational transport costs declined?. University of Chicago, 1999.
Raja Kali and Javier Reyes. The architecture of globalization: a network approach to international economic integration. Journal of International Business Studies, 38:595-620, 2007.
S Karlin and H M Taylor. A First Course in Stochastic Processes. Academic Press, New York, 1975.
Paul R. Krugman. Regionalism versus multilateralism: analytical notes. In Jaime de Melo and Arvind Panagariya, editors, New Dimensions in Regional Integration in CEPR, chapter 3, pages 58-89. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
Leamer, E.E. and Levinsohn, J. International Trade Theory: The Evidence. In G.M. Grossman and K. Rogoff, editors, Handbook of International Economics, chapter 26, pages 1339-1394. Elsevier, 1995.
Rose, A.K. One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade. Economic Policy, 15(30):7-46, 2000. Samuelson, P.A. The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs, II: Analysis of Effects of Trade Impediments. The Economic Journal, 64(254):264-289, 1954.
S. Wasserman and K. Faust. Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications of Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
B. Wellman and S. Berkovitz. Social Structure. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.