Nguyen Viet, Cuong (2003): Assessing the Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs in Vietnam.
Download (316Kb) | Preview
This paper aims to examine the poverty targeting and impacts of three poverty reeducation programs including programs ‘exemption of educational fees’, ‘provision with health care insurance’, and ‘micro-credit for the poor’ in Vietnam. It is found that the three programs have reached the poor quite well as compared to the international standard. The poor account for around 70 percent of participants in these programs. However the coverage of the programs over the poor is rather low, from 5 percent for the credit program to 11 percent for the health insurance program. There is no impact of the programs found on expenditure per capita, since it might take a long time for the programs to have large effects on income and expenditure. On average, households who were provided with preferential credit are more likely to have a pig, cow, buffalo, horse than other households.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Assessing the Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs in Vietnam|
|English Title:||Assessing the Impact of Poverty Reduction Programs in Vietnam|
|Keywords:||Poverty reduction program, impact evaluation, matching, household survey, Vietnam|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation; Social Discount Rate
I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
|Depositing User:||Cuong Nguyen Viet|
|Date Deposited:||05. Oct 2010 13:56|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 19:59|
Coady, David, Margaret Grosh, and John Hoddinott (2002), “The Targeting of Transfers in Developing Countries: Review of Experience and Lessons” (Social Safety Nets Primer Series), Washington, DC: World Bank.
Dehejia Rajeev H. and Sadex Wahba (1998), “Propensity Score Matching Methods for Non-Experimental Causal Studies”, NBER Working Paper 6829, Cambridge, Mass.
Government (1998a), “Decision No. 133/1998/QD-TTg of July 23, 1998 to Ratify the National Target Program on Hunger Elimination and Poverty Alleviation in the 1998-2000 Period”.
Government (1998b), “Decision No. 135/1998/QD-TTg of July 31, 1998 to Approve the Program on Socio-Economic Development In Mountainous, Deep-Lying And Remote Communes With Special Difficulties”.
Heckman, Jame, Hidehiko Ichimura, and Petra Todd (1997), “Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimators: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme”, Review of Economic Studies, 64 (4), 605- 654.
Rosenbaum, Paul and Ronald Rubin (1983), “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects”, Biometrika, 70 (1), 41-55.
Rosenbaum, Paul and Ronald Rubin (1985), “Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods that Incorporate the Propensity”, American Statistician, 39 (1), 33-38.
Rubin, Donald (1977), “Assignment to a Treatment Group on the Basis of a Covariate”, Journal of Educational Statistics, 2 (1), 1-26.