Popov, Vladimir (2006): Life cycle of the centrally planned economy: Why Soviet growth rates peaked in the 1950s. Published in: (2007)
Download (265kB) | Preview
The highest rates of growth of labor productivity in the Soviet Union were observed not in the 1930s (3% annually), but in the 1950s (6%). The TFP growth rates by decades increased from 0.6% annually in the 1930s to 2.8% in the 1950s and then fell monotonously becoming negative in the 1980s. The decade of 1950s was thus the “golden period” of Soviet economic growth. The patterns of Soviet growth of the 1950s in terms of growth accounting were very similar to the Japanese growth of the 1950s-70s and to Korean and Taiwanese growth in the 1960-80s – fast increases in labor productivity counterweighted the decline in capital productivity, so that the TFP increased markedly. However, high Soviet economic growth lasted only for a decade, whereas in East Asia it continued for three to four decades, propelling Japan, South Korea and Taiwan into the ranks of developed countries. This paper offers an explanation for the inverted U-shaped trajectory of labor productivity and TFP in centrally planned economies (CPEs). It is argued that CPEs under-invested into the replacement of the retiring elements of the fixed capital stock and over-invested into the expansion of production capacities. The task of renovating physical capital contradicted the short-run goal of fulfilling plan targets, and therefore Soviet planners preferred to invest in new capacities instead of upgrading the old ones. Hence, after the massive investment of the 1930s in the USSR, the highest productivity was achieved after the period equal to the average service life of fixed capital stock (about 20 years) – before there emerged a need for the massive investment into replacing retirement. Afterwards, the capital stock started to age rapidly reducing sharply capital productivity and lowering labor productivity and TFP growth rates.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Life cycle of the centrally planned economy: Why Soviet growth rates peaked in the 1950s|
|Keywords:||Centrally planned economy, growth cycle, retirement of fixed capital stock|
|Subjects:||P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P17 - Performance and Prospects
P - Economic Systems > P2 - Socialist Systems and Transitional Economies > P20 - General
O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity
|Depositing User:||Vladimir Popov|
|Date Deposited:||18. Jan 2011 13:34|
|Last Modified:||16. Mar 2015 05:59|
Bergson, A. 1983. Technological progress. – In: A. Bergson and H. Levine “The Soviet Economy Towards the Year 2000”, London, UK, George Allen and Unwin, 1983.
Commission of the European Communities. 1990. Stabilization, Liberalization and Devolution: Assessment of the Economic Situation and Reform Process in the Soviet Union. December 19, 1990.
Desai, P. 1976. The Production Function and Technical Change in Postwar Soviet Industry. – American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No. 3, pp. 372-381.
Domar, E. Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. N.Y., 1957.
Easterly, W., Fisher, S. 1995. The Soviet Economic Decline. – The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 9, No.3, pp. 341-71.
Faltsman V. 1985. Proizvodstvenniye Moschnosty. (Production Facilities) – Voprosy Economiki, 1985, No. 3, p. 47.
Gomulka, S.1977. Slowdown in Soviet Industrial Growth, 1947-1985 Reconsidered. – European Economic Review, Vol. 10, No.1 (October), pp. 37-49.
Guriev, S., Ickes, B. 2000. Microeconomic Aspects of Economic Growth in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union, 1950-2000. GDN Growth Project.
Iacopetta, M. (2003). Dissemination of Technology in Market and Planned Economies School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Mimeo. June, 2003
Ickes, B. and R. Ryterman (1997). Entry Without Exit: Economic Selection Under Socialism. Department of Economics. The Pennsylvania State University. Mimeo. 1997.
IMF, WB, OECD, EBRD. 1991. A Study of the Soviet Economy. February 1991. Vol. 1,2,3.
Krugman, P. 1994. The Myth of Asia’s Miracle. – Foreign Affairs, November/December 1994, pp. 62-78.
Narkhoz (Narodnoye Khosyaistvo SSSR), various years, Goskomstat.
Ofer, G. 1987. Soviet economic Growth: 1928-85. – Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 25, No. 4 (December), pp. 1767-1833.
Radelet, S., Sachs, J. 1997. Asia’s Reemergence. – Foreign Affairs, November/December 1997, pp. 44-59.
Schroeder, G. 1995.Reflections on economic Sovetology. – Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 11, No.3, pp. 197-234.
Shmelev, N., and Popov, V. 1989. The Turning Point: Revitalizing the Soviet Economy. New York, Doubleday, 1989.
Wang, Yan and Yao Yudong (2001). Sources of China s Economic Growth, 1952-99. The World Bank, World Bank Institute, Economic Policy and Poverty Reduction Division July 2001.
Weitzman, M. 1970. Soviet Postwar Economic Growth and Capital-Labor Substitution. – American Economic Review, Vol. 60, No.5 (December), pp. 676-92.
Young A. 1994. Lessons from the East Asian NICs: A Contrarian View. – European Economic Review, Vol. 38, No.4, pp. 964-73.
Valtukh, K., Lavrovskyi B. "Proizvodstvennyi Apparat Strany: Ispol'zovaniye i Rekonstruktsiya" (Production Facilities of a Country: Utilization and Reconstruction). - EKO, 1986, N2, pp. 17-32.