Corrigan, Jay and Drichoutis, Andreas and Lusk, Jayson and Nayga, Rodolfo and Rousu, Matt (2011): Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial Collaboration.
Download (162Kb) | Preview
It is generally thought that market outcomes are improved with the provision of market information. As a result, the use of repeated rounds with price feedback has become standard practice in the applied experimental auction valuation literature. We conducted two experiments to determine how rationally subjects behave with and without price feedback in a second price auction. Results from an auction for lotteries show that subjects exposed to price feedback are significantly more likely to commit preference reversals. However, this irrationality diminishes in later rounds. Results from an induced value auction indicate that price feedback caused greater deviations from the Nash equilibrium bidding strategy. Our results suggest that while bidding on the same item repeatedly improves auction outcomes, this improvement is not the result of price feedback.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Repeated Rounds with Price Feedback in Experimental Auction Valuation: An Adversarial Collaboration|
|Keywords:||bid affiliation; posted prices; induced value experiment; preference reversals; lotteries|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure and Pricing > D44 - Auctions|
|Depositing User:||Andreas Drichoutis|
|Date Deposited:||03. Feb 2011 19:58|
|Last Modified:||20. Feb 2013 10:48|
Alfnes, F., and K. Rickertsen. 2003. "European Consumers' Willingness to Pay for U.S. Beef in Experimental Auction Markets." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85(2):396-405.
Ariely, D., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2003. "“Coherent arbitrariness”: Stable demand curves without stable preferences." Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1):73-105.
Bateman, I., D. Kahneman, A. Munro, C. Starmer, and R. Sugden. 2005. "Testing competing models of loss aversion: An adversarial collaboration." Journal of Public Economics 89(8):1561-1580.
Corrigan, J.R., D.P.T. Depositario, R.M. Nayga, Jr., X. Wu, and T.P. Laude. 2009. "Comparing open-ended choice experiments and experimental auctions: An application to golden rice." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 91(3):837 - 853.
Corrigan, J.R., and M.C. Rousu. 2006. "Posted prices and bid affiliation: Evidence from experimental auctions." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(4):1078–1090.
Cox, J.C., and D.M. Grether. 1996. "The preference reversal phenomenon: response mode, markets and incentives." Economic Theory 7:C381-C405.
Dasgupta, P., and E. Maskin. 2000. "Efficient auctions." Quarterly Journal of Economics 115(2):341-388.
Davis, D.D., and C.A. Holt. 1993. Experimental economics. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Drichoutis, A.C., and R.M. Nayga. 2012. "Marginal changes in random parameters ordered response models with interaction terms." Econometric Reviews (forthcoming).
Drichoutis, A.C., R.M. Nayga, Jr., P. Lazaridis, and B.-S. Park. 2009. "Testing for bid affiliation in repeated second price auctions with posted prices." Paper prepared for the II Workshop on Valuation Methods in Agro-food and Environmental Economics “Experimental Auctions: theoretical background and empirical applications", 2-3 July, Barcelona, Spain.
Fischbacher, U. 2007. "z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments." Experimental Economics 10(2):171-178.
Greene, W.H. 2007. Limdep version 9.0, Econometric modeling guide. Plainview, New York: Econometric Software Inc.
Harrison, G.W. 2006. "Experimental evidence on alternative environmental valuation methods." Environmental & Resource Economics 36:125-162.
---. 1992. "Theory and misbehavior of first-price auctions: Reply." The American Economic Review 82(5):1426-1443.
Harrison, G.W., R.M. Harstad, and E.E. Rutström. 2004. "Experimental methods and elicitation of values." Experimental Economics 7(2):123-140.
Harrison, G.W., M.I. Lau, and E.E. Rutström. 2009. "Risk attitudes, randomization to treatment, and self-selection into experiments." Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 70(3):498-507.
Hoffman, E., D.J. Menkhaus, D. Chakravarti, R.A. Field, and G.D. Whipple. 1993. "Using Laboratory Experimental Auctions in Marketing Research: A Case Study of New Packaging for Fresh Beef." Marketing Science 12(3):318-338.
Kagel, J., and A.E. Roth. 1995. The handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Kagel, J.H., R.M. Harstad, and D. Levin. 1987. "Information impact and allocation rules in auctions with affiliated private values: A laboratory study." Econometrica 55(6):1275-1304.
Klemperer, P. 1999. "Auction theory: A guide to the literature." Journal of Economic Surveys 13(3):227-286.
Knetch, J.L., F.-F. Tang, and R.H. Thaler. 2001. "The endowment effect and repeated market trials:Is the Vickrey auction demand revealing?" Experimental Economics 4:257-269.
Ledyard, J.O. (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research, ed. J.H. Kagel, and A.E. Roth, Princeton University Press.
List, J.A., and J.F. Shogren. 1999. "Price information and bidding behavior in repeated second-price auctions." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81(4):942-949.
Lusk, J.L., C. Alexander, and M.C. Rousu. 2007. "Designing experimental auctions for marketing research: The effect of values, distributions, and mechanisms on incentives for truthful bidding." Review of Marketing Science 5(1).
Lusk, J.L., T. Feldkamp, and T.C. Schroeder. 2004. "Experimental auction procedure: Impact on valuation of quality differentiated goods." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2):389-405.
Lusk, J.L., and J.F. Shogren 2007. Experimental auctions, Methods and applications in economic and marketing research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Margolis, M., and J.F. Shogren. 2004. "Implementing the efficient auction: Initial results from the lab." Economics Letters 84(1):141-147.
Milgrom, P.R., and R.J. Weber. 1982. "A theory of auctions and competitive bidding." Econometrica 50(5):1089-1122. Perry, M., and P.J. Reny. 2002. "An efficient auction." Econometrica 70(3):1199-1212.
Plott, C.R. (1996) Rational individual behavior in markets and social choice processes: The discovered preference hypothesis, ed. K.J. Arrow,E. Colombatto,M. Perlaman, and C. Schmidt. London, Macmillan and New York: St Martin's Press, pp. 225-250.
Plott, C.R., and K. Zeiler. 2005. "The willingness to pay–willingness to accept gap, the “endowment effect,” subject misconceptions, and experimental procedures for eliciting valuations." The American Economic Review 95(3):530-545.
Rutström, E.E. 1998. "Home-grown values and incentive compatible auction design." International Journal of Game Theory 27:427-441.
Seidl, C. 2002. "Preference reversal." Journal of Economic Surveys 16(5):621-655.
Shogren , J.F. 2006. "Valuation in the lab." Environmental & Resource Economics 34(163-172).
Shogren, J.F., S. Cho, C. Koo, J.A. List, C. Park, P. Polo, and R. Wilhelmi. 2001. "Auction mechanisms and the measurement of WTP and WTA." Resource and Energy Economics 23(2):97-109.
Shogren, J.F., and D.J. Hayes. 1997. "Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept: Reply." The American Economic Review 87(1):241-244.
Shogren, J.F., M. Margolis, C. Koo, and J.A. List. 2001. "A random nth-price auction." Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46(4):409-421.
Shogren , J.F., S.Y. Shin, D.J. Hayes, and J.B. Kliebenstein. 1994. "Resolving differences in willingness to pay and willingness to accept." The American Economic Review 84(1):255-270.
Smith, V.L. 1962. "An experimental study of competitive market behavior." Journal of Political Economy 70(3):322-322.
Tufano, F. 2010. "Are ‘true’ preferences revealed in repeated markets? An experimental demonstration of context-dependent." Experimental Economics 13(1):1-13.
Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. "Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases." Science 185(4157):1124-1131.
Vickrey, W. 1961. "Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders." Journal of Finance 16(1):8-37.