Halkos, George and Tzeremes, Nickolaos (2011): Does the Kyoto Protocol Agreement matters? An environmental efficiency analysis.
Download (173kB) | Preview
This paper uses both conditional and unconditional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) models in order to determine different environmental efficiency levels for a sample of 110 countries in 2007. In order to capture the effect of countries compliance with the Kyoto Protocol Agreement (KPA), we condition the years since a country has signed the agreement until 2007. Particularly, various DEA models have been applied alongside with bootstrap techniques in order to determine the effect of Kyoto protocol agreement on countries’ environmental efficiencies. The study illustrates how the recent developments in efficiency analysis and statistical inference can be applied when evaluating environmental performance issues. The results indicate that the first six years after countries signed the Kyoto protocol agreement have a positive effect on their environmental efficiencies. However after that period it appears that countries avoid complying with the actions imposed by the agreement which in turn has an immediate negative effect on their environmental efficiencies.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Does the Kyoto Protocol Agreement matters? An environmental efficiency analysis|
|Keywords:||Environmental efficiency; Kyoto protocol agreement; Conditional full frontiers; Statistical inference; DEA|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C00 - General
C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C60 - General
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy
|Depositing User:||Nickolaos Tzeremes|
|Date Deposited:||04. May 2011 06:44|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 14:30|
Ali AI, Lerme CS, Seiford LM (1995) Components of efficiency evaluation in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 80:462–473.
Bădin L, Daraio C, Simar L. (2010) Optimal bandwidth selection for conditional efficiency measures: A Data-driven approach. European Journal of Operational Research 201: 633-640.
Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. (1984) Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30: 1078 – 1092.
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes LE (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444.
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management 51: 229–240.
Cropper ML, Oates WE (1992) Environmental economics: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature 30(2): 675–740.
Daraio C, Simar L (2007) Advanced robust and nonparametric methods in efficiency analysis. Methodology and Applications, Springer: New York.
Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: A probabilistic approach. Journal of Productivity Analysis 24: 93–121.
Dyckhoff H, Allen K (2001) Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 132: 312–325.
Efron B (1979) Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics 7: 1-16.
Epstein L, Denny M (1980) Endogenous capital utilization in a short run production model. Journal of Econometrics 12: 189 – 207.
Färe R, Grosskopf S (2003) Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85:1070–74.
Färe R, Grosskopf S (2004) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment. European Journal of Operational Research 157: 242–245.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK, Pasurka C. (1989) Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: a nonparametric approach. The Review of Economic and Statistics 71: 90–98.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Pasurka C. (1986) Effects on relative efficiency in electric power generation due to environmental controls. Resources and Energy Economics 8:167–184.
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Tyteca D (1996) An activity analysis model of the environment performance of firms: application to fossil-fuel-fired electric utilities. Ecological Economics 18: 161-175.
Farrell MJ (1957) The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 120: 253-290.
Feldstein M, Foot D (1971) The Other Half of Gross Investment: Replacement and Modernization. Review of Economics and Statistics 53:49–58.
Ferguson, L., Mcgregor, PG, Swales, JK, Turner KR, Ya Ping, Y (2005) Incorporating sustainability indicators into a computable general equilibrium model of the Scottish economy. Economic Systems Research 17(2): 103-140.
Forssell, O. (1998) Extending economy-wide models with environment-related parts. Economic Systems Research 10: 183-199.
Forssell, O., Polenske, K.R. (1998) Introduction: input–output and the environment, Economic Systems Research 10: 91-97.
Gale, L.R. (1995) Trade liberalization and pollution: an input–output study of carbon dioxide emissions in Mexico. Economic Systems Research 7: 309-320.
Hailu A (2003) Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 85:1075–77.
Hailu A, Veeman TS (2001) Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83: 605–16.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2009) Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecological Economics 68: 2168-2176.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2010a) Measuring biodiversity performance: A conditional efficiency measurement approach. Environmental Modelling and Software, 25(12): 1866-1873.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2010b) The effect of foreign ownership on SMEs performance: An efficiency analysis perspective. Journal of Productivity Analysis 34(2): 167-180.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2010c) A DEA approach for measuring university departments’ efficiency. MPRA Paper 24029, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2010d) Measuring the effect of virtual mergers on banks’ efficiency levels:A non parametric analysis. MPRA Paper 23696, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Halkos GE, Tzeremes NG. (2011) Modelling the effect of national culture on multinational banks' performance: A conditional robust nonparametric frontier analysis. Economic Modelling 28(1-2): 515-525.
Hall P, Racine JS, Li Q (2004) Cross-validation and the estimation of conditional probability densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 99: 1015–1026.
Hoekstra R , Janssen MA (2006) Environmental responsibility and policy in a two country dynamic input-output model, Economic Systems Research 18: 1, 61-84.
International Energy Agency –IEA (2010). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion – Highlights 2010; available online at: (http://www.iea.org/co2highlights/).
Kopp G. (1998) Carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth: a structural approach. Journal of Applied Statistics 25: 489–515.
Korhonen P, Luptacik M (2004) Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: an extension of data envelopment analysis. European. Journal of Operational Research 154: 437–446.
Kumar S, Khanna M. (2009) Measurement of environmental efficiency and productivity: a cross-country analysis. Environment and Development Economics 14: 473–495.
Li Q, Racine JS. (2004) Cross-validated local linear nonparametric regression. Statistica Sinica 14: 485-512.
Li Q, Racine JS (2007) Nonparametric Econometrics: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press.
Li, P. and Rose, A. (1995) Global warming policy and the Pennsylvania economy: a computable general equilibrium analysis, Economic Systems Research 7, 151-171.
Mandal SK, Madheswaran S (2010) Environmental efficiency of the Indian cement industry: An interstate analysis. Energy Policy 38:1108-118.
Murty MN, Kumar S. (2002) Measuring cost of environmentally sustainable industrial development in India: a distance function approach. Environmental and Development Economics 7: 467–486.
Nadaraya EA. (1965) On nonparametric estimates of density functions and regression curves. Theory of Applied Probability 10: 186–190.
Östblom G (1997) The environmental outcome of emissions-intensive economic growth: a critical look at official growth projections for Sweden up to the year 2000. Economic Systems Research 10(1): 19-30.
Pittman RW (1981) Issues in pollution control: interplant cost differences and economies of scale. Land Economics 57:1–17.
Ramon J, Cristóbal S (2010) An environmental/input-output linear programming model to reach the targets for greenhouse gas emissions set by the Kyoto Protocol. Economic Systems Research 22(3): 223-236.
Reinhard S, Lovell CAK, Thijssen G (2000) Environmental efficiency with multiple environmentally detrimental variables; estimated with SFA and DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 121: 287–303.
Reinhard S, Lovell CAK, Thijssen G. (1999) Econometric estimation of technical and environmental efficiency: an application to Dutch dairy farms. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81: 44–60.
Scheel H. (2001) Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research 132: 400–410.
Seiford LM, Zhu J (1998) Identifying excesses and deficits in Chinese industrial productivity (1953–1990): A weighted data envelopment analysis approach. OMEGA 26: 269–279.
Seiford LM, Zhu J (2005) A response to comments on modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 161: 579–581.
Seiford LM, Zhu J. (2002) Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 142: 16-20.
Shephard RW. (1970) Theory of Cost and Production Function. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Silverman BW. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall: London.
Simar L, Wilson PW. (2000) A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics 27: 779 -802.
Simar L, Wilson PW. (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in non parametric frontier models. Management Science 44: 49-61.
Simar L, Wilson PW. (2008) Statistical inference in non-parametric frontier models: Recent development and Perspectives. In: Fried HO, Lovell CAK, Schmidt SS, editors. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth. Oxford University Press: New York, p. 421-522.
Simar L, Wilson PW. (2002) Non parametric tests of return to scale. European Journal of Operational Research 139:115-132.
Taskin F, Zaim O. (2000) Searching for a Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency using kernel estimations. Economics Letters 68: 217–223.
Taskin F, Zaim O. (2001) The role of international trade on environmental efficiency: a DEA approach. Economic Modelling 18:1-17.
The World Bank (2008) World, Development Data Group. Development Indicators Online. Washington, DC: The World Bank 2008; available online at: (http://go.worldbank.org/U0FSM7AQ40).
Thrall RM (1996) Duality, classification and slacks in DEA. Annals of Operations Research 66: 109–138.
Tsolas I. (2005) Aggregate environmental performance indicators for thermal electrical power sector: a comparative approach. IASME Transactions 5: 663–667.
Tsolas I. (2010) Performance assessment of mining operations using nonparametric production analysis: A bootstrapping approach in DEA. Resource Policy, doi:10.1016/j.resourpol.2010.10.003.
Tyteca D (1996) On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms- A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective. Journal of Environmental Management 46: 281- 308.
Tyteca D (1997) Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms: concepts and empirical results. Journal of Productivity Analysis 8: 175–189.
UNFCCC (2006). Kyoto Protocol Status of Ratification. Bonn: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2006; available online at: (http://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/kyoto_protocol/application/pdf/kpstats.pdf).
Verstraete J (1976) An estimate of the capital stock for the Belgian industrial sector. European Economic Review 8: 33 – 49.
Watson GS. (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhya Series A 26: 359–372.
Wier M, Christoffersen LB, Jensen TS, Pedersen OG, Keiding H, Munksgaard J (2005) Evaluating sustainability of household consumption-Using DEA to assess environmental performance. Economic Systems Research 17(4): 425-447.
Wu Y. (2004) Openness, productivity and growth in the APEC economies. Empirical Economics 29: 593–604.
Yamakawa A, Peters GP. (2009) Using time-series to measure uncertainty in environmental input-output analysis. Economic Systems Research 21(4): 337-362.
Zaim O, Taskin F. (2000) A Kuznets curve in environmental efficiency: an application on OECD countries. Environmental and Resource Economics 17: 21–36.
Zaim O. (2004) Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecological Economics 48: 37–47.
Zhang XP, Cheng XM, Yuan JH, Gao XJ (2011) Total-factor energy efficiency in developing countries. Energy Policy 39: 644-650.
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Slacks-based efficiency measures for modelling environmental performance. Ecological Economics 60: 111–118.
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies. Energy Economics 30: 1-14.
Zofio JL, Prieto AM (2001) Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics 23: 63–83.
Zofio JL, Prieto AM. (2001) Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resource and Energy Economics 23: 63–83.