Murray, Cameron K (2011): Income dependent direct and indirect rebound effects from ’green’ consumption choices in Australia.
Download (2MB) | Preview
Changing household behaviour is often encouraged as a means of reducing energy demand and subsequently greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The direct and indirect rebound effects from cost-saving ‘green’ household consumption choices were estimated using Australian data. Rebound effects from cost-saving 'green' consumption choices are modelled as income effects, allowing for variation with households income level.
Cases examined are: reduced vehicle use, reduced electricity use, the adoption of energy efficient vehicles, and the adoption of energy efficient electrical lighting.
Four econometric estimation models are utilised to estimate income effects, and the before and after expenditure patterns are matched with life-cycle assessment (LCA) estimates of the embodied GHG of each expenditure category. Direct and indirect rebound effects alone are estimated at around 10% for household electricity conservation, and for reduced vehicle fuel consumption around 20%, at the median household income level.
Direct rebound effects are larger for low-income households; however, indirect effects are larger for higher income households. The scale of the effect estimated, and the variation with household incomes, is attributed to LCA methodologies. These results should be interpreted as the minimum rebound effect, with greater rebound effects, and decreased effectiveness of household ‘green’ consumption, expected in reality.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Income dependent direct and indirect rebound effects from ’green’ consumption choices in Australia|
|Keywords:||rebound effects; conservation; household consumption|
|Subjects:||Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q50 - General
D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy
D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General
|Depositing User:||Cameron K Murray|
|Date Deposited:||24. Nov 2011 14:38|
|Last Modified:||19. Feb 2013 12:48|
ABS. 2004. Household Expenditure Survey. In Household expenditure survey and survey of income and housing. Expanded CURF. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
ABS. 2006. Survey of motor vehicle use - 9208.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
AGO. 2007. Global Warming - Cool it! . Canberra: Department of Environment and Water Resources - Australian Greenhouse Office.
Alcott, Blake. 2005. Jevons' paradox. Ecological Economics 54 (1):9-21.
Alfredsson, E. C. 2004. "Green" consumption--no solution for climate change. Energy 29 (4):513-524.
Baker, Paul, Richard Blundell, and John Micklewright. 1989. Modelling household energy expenditures using micro-data. Economic Journal 99 (397):720-738.
Be climate clever. 2007. Canberra ACT: Australian Government.
Bento, Antonio M., and Mark Jacobsen. 2007. Ricardian rents, environmental policy and the `double-dividend' hypothesis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 53 (1):17-31.
Berkhout, Peter H. G., Jos C. Muskens, and Jan W. Velthuijsen. 2000. Defining the rebound effect. Energy Policy 28 (6-7):425-432.
Bovenberg, A. Lans, and Ruud A. de Mooij. 1994. Environmental levies and distortionary taxation. The American Economic Review 84 (4):1085.
Brannlund, Runar, Tarek Ghalwash, and Jonas Nordstrom. 2007. Increased energy efficiency and the rebound effect: Effects on consumption and emissions. Energy Economics 29 (1):1-17.
Brookes, L. G. 1972. More on the Output Elasticity of Energy Consumption. The Journal of Industrial Economics 21 (1):83-92.
Brookes, Len. 1990. The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficient solution. Energy Policy 18 (2):199-201.
Carlsson-Kanyama, Annika, Rebecka Engstr√∂m, and Rixt Kok. 2005. Indirect and Direct Energy Requirements of City Households in Sweden: Options for Reduction, Lessons from Modeling. Journal of Industrial Ecology 9 (1/2):221-235.
Chalkley, Ann Marie, Eric Billett, and David Harrison. 2001. An investigation of the possible extent of the Re-spending Rebound Effect in the sphere of consumer products. The Journal of Sustainable Product Design 1 (3):163-170.
Costanza, Robert. 1980. Embodied Energy and Economic Valuation. Science 210 (4475):1219-1224.
Deaton, Angus, and John Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and consumer behaviour. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.
Dey, Christopher. 2008. Embodied energy of 2003-4 ABS HES commodity groups. Sydney: Centre for Integrated Sustainability Analysis.
Drive: Now your motoring. 2008. Fairfax Digital 2008 [cited 24th July 2008]. Available from http://www.drive.com.au/know/.
Druckman, A., M. Chitnis, S. Sorrell and T. Jackson, 2011. Missing carbon reductions? Exploring rebound and backfire effects in UK households. Energy Policy 39: 3572–3581.
Ekins, Paul. 2000. Economic Growth and Environmental Sustainability. New York: Routledge.
Fuelwatch. 2008. Western Australian Government. Department of Consumer and Employment Protection 2008 [cited 11th November 2008]. Available from http://www.fuelwatch.com.au/prices/dsp_hist_avg.cfm.
The Green Home Guide. 2007. In Southern Queensland Edition: Australian Conservation Foundation.
Greening, Lorna A. 2001. Effects of changes in residential end-uses and behavior on aggregate carbon intensity: comparison of 10 OECD countries for the period 1970 through 1993. Energy Economics 23:153-178.
Hanley, Nick, Peter G. McGregor, J. Kim Swales, and Karen Turner. 2008. Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? Ecological Economics In Press, Corrected Proof.
Haque, M. Ohidul. 2005. Income elasticity and economic development: Methods and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hertwich, E. G. 2005. Life Cycle Approaches to Sustainable Consumption: A Critical Review. Environmental Science & Technology 39 (13):4673-4684.
Holtz-Eakin, Douglas, and Thomas M. Selden. 1995. Stoking the fires? CO2 emissions and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics 57 (1):85-101.
Hong, Sung H., Tadj Oreszczyn, and Ian Ridley. 2006. The impact of energy efficient refurbishment on the space heating fuel consumption in English dwellings. Energy and Buildings 38 (10):1171-1181.
Inhaber, Herbert. 1997. Why energy conservation fails. Westport, Connecticut: Quorom Books.
Jevons, Stanley. 1865. The coal question: An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal mines. London: Macmillan and Co.
Karunaratne, Neil Dias. 1981. An input-output analysis of Australian energy planning issues. Energy Economics 3 (3):159-168.
Khazzoom, J. Daniel. 1980. Economic implications for mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. . The Energy Journal 1 (4):21-40.
Kok, Rixt, Rene M. J. Benders, and Henri C. Moll. 2006. Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input-output energy analysis: A comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy 34 (17):2744-2761.
Lawn, Philip. 2007. Frontier issues in ecological economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Lenzen, Manfred. 1998. Energy and greenhouse gas cost of living for Australia during 1993/94. Energy 23 (6):497-516.
Lenzen, Manfred, Christoper Dey, and Barney Foran. 2004. Energy requirements of Sydney households. Ecological Economics 49:375-399.
Lenzen, Manfred, and Christopher J. Dey. 2002. Economic, energy and greenhouse emissions impacts of some consumer choice, technology and government outlay options. Energy Economics 24 (4):377-403.
Lenzen, Manfred, Mette Wier, Claude Cohen, Hitoshi Hayami, Shonali Pachauri, and Roberto Schaeffer. 2006. A comparative multivariate analysis of household energy requirements in Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India and Japan. Energy 31 (2-3):181-207.
Lovins, A. B., J. Henly, H. Ruderman, and M. D. Levine. 1988. Energy saving resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances: another view; a follow-up. The Energy Journal 9 (2).
Maddala, G.S. 1965. Productivity and technological change in the bituminous coal industry, 1919-54. Journal of Political Economy 73 (4):352-365.
Madlener, R., and B. Alcott. 2009. Energy rebound and economic growth: A review of the main issues and research needs. Energy 34 (3):370-376.
Manresa, Antonio, and Ferran Sancho. 2005. Implementing a double dividend: recycling ecotaxes towards lower labour taxes. Energy Policy 33:1577-1585.
Milne, Geoffrey, and Brenda Boardman. 2000. Making cold homes warmer: the effect of energy efficiency improvements in low-income homes A report to the Energy Action Grants Agency Charitable Trust. Energy Policy 28 (6-7):411-424.
Mizobuchi, Kenichi. 2008. An empirical study on the rebound effect considering capital costs. Energy Economics 30 (5):2486-2516.
OECD. 2002. Towards sustainable consumption? In Trends and policies in OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
Ornetzeder, Michael, Edgar G. Hertwich, Klaus Hubacek, Katarina Korytarova, and Willi Haas. 2008. The environmental effect of car-free housing: A case in Vienna. Ecological Economics 65 (3):516-530.
Registration fees. 2008. Queensland Transport 2008 [cited 24th July 2008]. Available from http://www.transport.qld.gov.au/Home/Registration/Motor_vehicles/Registration_fees/.
Reinders, A. H. M. E., K. Vringer, and K. Blok. 2003. The direct and indirect energy requirement of households in the European Union. Energy Policy 31 (2):139-153.
Research and reviews. 2008. Fox 2008 [cited 24th July 2008]. Available from http://carsguide.news.com.au/site/research/.
Roy, Joyashree. 2000. The rebound effect: some empirical evidence from India. Energy Policy 28 (6-7):433-438.
Saunders, Harry D. 2000. A view from the macro side: rebound, backfire, and Khazzoom-Brookes. Energy Policy 28 (6-7):439-449.
Schipper, Lee, and Michael Grubb. 2000. On the rebound? Feedback between energy intensities and energy uses in IEA countries. Energy Policy 28 (6-7):367-388.
Sorrell, Steve, and John Dimitropoulos. 2008. The rebound effect: Microeconomic definitions, limitations and extensions. Ecological Economics 65 (3):636-649.
UN. 1992. Report of the UN conference on environment and development - Chapter 4 - Changing consumption patterns. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: United Nations.
Vringer, Kees, Theo Aalbers, and Kornelis Blok. 2007. Household energy requirement and value patterns. Energy Policy 35:553-566.
Vringer, Kees, and Kornelis Blok. 1995. The direct and indirect energy requirements of households in the Netherlands. Energy Policy 23 (10):893-910.
Vringer, Kees, and Kornelis Blok. 2000. Long-term trends and direct and indirect household energy intensitites: A factor in dematerialisation? Energy Policy 28:713-727.
Weber, Christoph, and Adriaan Perrels. 2000. Modelling lifestyle effects on energy demand and related emissions. Energy Policy 28 (8):549-566.
Weizacker, Ernst Von, Amory B. Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. 1998. Factor four: Doubling wealth, halving resource use. London: Earthscan.
Wirl, Franz. 1997. The economics of conservation programs. Dortrecht: Kulwer Academic Publishers.
Available Versions of this Item
- Income dependent direct and indirect rebound effects from ’green’ consumption choices in Australia. (deposited 24. Nov 2011 14:38) [Currently Displayed]