Knowledge spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms

Aldieri, Luigi (2011): Knowledge spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms.

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the relationship between R&D spillovers and productivity. To this aim, we use data from 9th and 10th “Indagine sulle imprese manifatturiere” (IMM) surveys carried out by Capitalia. These two surveys, which cover the period 2001-2006, contain both quantitative and qualitative information on a large sample of Italian firms. The main contribution of this paper is to stress the importance of replacing the traditional high-tech/low-tech industries with a classification more suitable to capture the nature of new technologies. Indeed, the industry data are summarised in a particular taxonomy, according to Pavitt methodology: Supplier dominated, Scale intensive, Specialized suppliers and Science based. This taxonomy accounts for differences in the knowledge intensity and innovative activities within sectors. The estimation method takes into account the endogeneity of regressors and simultaneity issue regarding firms’ decision to invest in R&D. The results provide evidence of higher productivity in R&D intensive industries and this can be interpreted as the signal of the relevance of spillover effects.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Industry taxonomies; R&D; Productivity; Spillovers
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights

References

Aldieri L. (2011a). Absorptive capacity and Knowledge Flows for Large International Firms: A Survey. Chinese Business Review, 10, 51-66

Aldieri L. (2011b). Technological and Geographical proximity effects on Knowledge spillovers: evidence from the US patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20, 597-607

Aldieri L. and Cincera M. (2009). Geographic and Technological R&D Spillover within the Triad: micro evidence from US patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 196-211

Antonelli C. (1994). Technological districts localized spillovers and productivity growth. The Italian evidence on technological externalities in the core regions. International Review of Applied Economics, 8, 18-30

Arellano M. and Bover O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental-variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29-52

Arrow K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173

Bernstein J. (1988). Costs of production, intra- and inter-industry R&D spillovers: Canadian evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics, 21, 324-347

Blundell R. and Bond S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143

Blundell R. And Bond S. (2000). GMM estimation with persistent panel data: an application to production functions. Econometric Reviews, 19, 321-340

Brandstetter L. (1996). Are knowledge spillovers international or intra-national in scope? Microeconometric evidence from the US and Japanese R&D intensive sectors. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5800

Geroski P. A. (1991). Innovation and the sectoral sources of UK productivity growth. The Economic Journal, 101, 1438-1451

Goto A. and Suzuki K. (1989). R&D capital, rate of return on R&D investment and spillover of R&D in Japanese manufacturing industries. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 555-564

Griffith R., Harrison R. and Van Reenen J. (2006). How Special is the Special Relationship? Using the impact of US R&D Spillovers on UK firms as a Test of Technology sourcing. American Economic Review, 96, 1859-1875

Griliches Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116

Griliches Z. and Mairesse J. (1995). Production functions : The search for identification. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 5067

Hall B. H. and Mairesse J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 263-294

Jaffe A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits and market value. American Economic Review, 76, 984–1001

Kafouros M. I. and Buckley P. J. (2008). Under what conditions do firms benefit from the research efforts of other organizations? Research Policy, 37, 225-239

Lychagin S., Pinkse J., Slade M. E. and Van Reenen J. (2010). Spillovers in Space: Does Geography Matter? National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 16188

Nelson R. R. (1959). The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy, 67, 297-306

O’Mahoni M. and Vecchi M. (2009). R&D, Knowledge spillovers and company productivity performance. Research Policy, 38, 35-44

Orlando M. J. (2004). Measuring Spillovers from Industrial R&D: On the Importance of Geographic and Technological Proximity. Rand Journal of Economics, 35, 777-786

Pavitt K. (1984). Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343-373

Peri G. (2005). Determinants of knowledge flows and their effect on innovation. Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 308-322

Raut L. (1995). R&D spillovers and productivity growth: Evidence from Indian private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 48, 1-23

von Tunzelmann N. and Acha V. (2005). Innovation in ‘low-tech’ industries. In Fagerberg J., Mowery D., Nelson R. (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Wakelin K. (2001). Productivity growth and R&D expenditure in UK manufacturing firms. Research Policy, 30, 1079-1090