Lee, Kyeong Ho and Bellemare, Marc F. (2012): Look who's talking: the impacts of the intrahousehold allocation of mobile phones on agricultural prices.
Download (193Kb) | Preview
Using data from the Philippines, we study the impact of mobile phones on the prices agricultural producers receive for their cash crop. We first look at the impact on price of mobile phone ownership at the household level. Because this masks a considerable amount of heterogeneity, we then look at the impact on price of the intrahousehold allocation of mobile phones. We find that whether the household owns a mobile phone has no impact on price, but whether a farmer or his spouse own a mobile phone is associated with a 5- to 7-percent increase in price.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Look who's talking: the impacts of the intrahousehold allocation of mobile phones on agricultural prices|
|Keywords:||Agriculture; Prices Agricultural Prices; Household Models; Intrahousehold Allocations|
|Subjects:||D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing; Cooperatives; Agribusiness
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Energy; Environment; Other Primary Products
Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets
O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
|Depositing User:||Marc F Bellemare|
|Date Deposited:||21. May 2012 03:02|
|Last Modified:||12. Feb 2013 19:07|
Aker, J. (2010) Information from markets near and far: mobile phones and agricultural markets in Niger. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 2(3), pp. 46-59.
Aker, J. and Mbiti, I. (2010) Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24(3), pp. 207-232.
Alderman, H., Chiappori, P.-A., Haddad, L., Hoddinott, J. and Kanbur R. (1995) Unitary versus collective models of the household: is it time to shift the burden of the proof? World Bank Research Observer 10(1), pp. 1-19.
Ashraf, N. (2009) Spousal control and intrahousehold decision making: an experimental study in the Philippines. American Economic Review 99(4), pp. 1245-1277.
Basu, K. and Foster, J.E. (1998) On measuring literacy. Economic Journal 108(451), pp. 1733-1749.
Bellemare, M.F. and Barrett, C.B. (2006) An ordered tobit model of market participation: evidence from Kenya and Ethiopia. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 88(2), pp. 324-337.
Chowdhury, S.K. (2006) Access to a telephone and factor market participation of rural households in Bangladesh. Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(3), pp. 563-576.
Commander, S., Harrison, R. and Menezes-Filho N. (2011) ICT and productivity in developing countries: new firm-level evidence from Brazil and India. Review of Economics and Statistics 93(2), pp. 528-541.
Deaton, A. and Laroque, G. (1996) Competitive storage and commodity price dynamics. Journal of Political Economy 104(5), pp. 896-923.
de Janvry, A., Fafchamps, M. and Sadoulet E. (1991) Peasant household behaviour with missing markets: some paradoxes explained. Economic Journal 101(409), pp. 1400-1417.
Donner, J. (2009) Mobile-based livelihood services in Africa: pilots and early deployments, in: M. Fernandez-Ardevol and A. Ros Hijar (eds) Communication Technologies in Latin America and Africa: A Multidisciplinary Perspective (Barcelona: IN3), pp. 37-58.
Eder, J.F. (2006) Gender relations and household economic planning in the rural Philippines. Journal of Asian Studies 37(3), pp. 397-413.
Fafchamps, M. (2004) Market institutions in sub-Saharan Africa: theory and evidence (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
Fafchamps, M. and Vargas Hill, R. (2005) Selling at the farmgate or travelling to market. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 87(3), pp. 717-734.
Folbre, N. (1984) Household production in the Philippines: a non-neoclassical approach. Economic Development and Cultural Change 32(2), pp. 303-330.
Futch, M., and McIntosh, C.T. (2009) Tracking the introduction of the village phone product in Rwanda. Information Technologies & International Development 5(3), pp. 54-81.
Godquin, M. and Quisumbing, A. (2008) Separate but equal? The gendered nature of social capital in rural philippine communities. Journal of International Development 20(1), pp. 13-33.
Grameen Bank (2011) Village phones, http://www.grameen-info.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=681&Itemid=676 accessed May 17, 2011.
Halvorsen, R. and Palmquist, R. (1980) The interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 70(3), pp. 474-475.
International Telecommunications Union (2009) The world in 2009: ICT facts and figures, http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/material/Telecom09_flyer.pdf accessed May 17, 2011.
Jensen, R. (2007) The digital provide: information (technology) market performance, and welfare in the south Indian fisheries sector. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122(3), pp. 879-924.
Kennedy, P.E. (1981) Estimation with correctly interpreted dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. American Economic Review 71(4), pp. 801.
Key, N., Janvry, A. and Sadoulet, E. (2000) Transactions costs and agricultural household supply response. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82(2), pp. 245-259.
Klonner, S. and Nolen, P.J. (2010) Cell phones and rural labour markets: evidence from South Africa. Working Paper, Department of Economics, University of Essex.
Labonne, J. and Chase, R. (2009) The power of information: the impact of mobile phones on farmers’ welfare in the Philippines. Social Development Department, Policy Research Working Paper #4996, The World Bank.
Lundberg, S., Pollak, R. and Wales, T. (1997) Do husbands and wives pool resources? Evidence from the UK child benefit. Journal of Human Resources 32(3), pp. 463-480.
Millennium Villages Project (2010) Achieving the goals: progress to date, http://www.millenniumvillages.org/progress/ accessed May 17, 2011
Muto, M. and Yamano, T. (2009) The Impact of Mobile Phone Coverage Expansion on Market Participation: Panel Data Evidence from Uganda. World Development 37(12), pp. 1887-96.
National Statistical Office (2006) 2003 Family income and expenditure survey. (Manila: National Statistical Office).
National Statistical Office (2010) Agriculture sector in Central Luzon, http://www.census.gov.ph/data/sectordata/ag0412403.htm accessed May 17, 2011.
Nelson, K. (2010) Extension goes mobile. Rice Today 9(4), pp. 29-30.
Overa, R. (2006) Networks, distance, and trust: telecommunications development and changing trading practices in Ghana. World Development 34(7), pp. 1301-15.
Peterman, A., Behrman, J. and Quisumbing, A. (2011) A review of empirical evidence on gender differences in nonland agricultural inputs, technology, and services in developing countries. Discussion Paper 00975, Poverty, Health, and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.
Qian, N. (2008) Missing women and the price of tea in China: the effect of sex-specific earnings on sex imbalance. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(3), pp. 1251-1285.
Rubalcava, L., Teruel, G. and Thomas, D. (2009) Investments, time preferences, and public transfers paid to women. Economic Development and Cultural Change 57(3), pp. 507-538.
Schmeer, K.K. (2005) Married women’s resource position and household food expenditures in Cebu, Philippines. Journal of Marriage and Family 67(2), pp. 399-409.
Stinner, W.F. (1977) Urbanization and household structure in the Philippines. Journal of Marriage and Family 39(2), pp. 377-385.
Thomas, Duncan (1990) Intrahousehold resource allocation: an inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources 25(4), pp. 635-664.
Udry, Christopher (1996) Gender, agricultural production, and the theory of the household. Journal of Political Economy 104(5), pp. 1010-1046.