Delis, Manthos D and Staikouras, Panagiotis and Tsoumas, Chris (2013): Enforcement actions and bank behavior.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_43557.pdf Download (335kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Employing a unique data set for the period 2000-2010, this paper examines the impact of enforcement actions (sanctions) on bank capital, risk, and performance. We find that high risk weighted asset ratios tend to attract supervisory intervention. Sanctions whose cause lies at the core of bank safety and soundness curtail the risk-weighted asset ratio, but amplify the risk of insolvency and returns volatility, which implies that these sanctions do not improve the risk profile of the involved banks, possibly because they come too late. Sanctions targeting internal control and risk management weaknesses appear to be well-timed and to restrain further increases in the risk-weighted assets ratio without impairing bank fundamentals. Sanctions against institution-affiliated parties do not seem to affect bank behavior. We suggest that supervisory attention should be placed on the timely uncovering of internal control and risk management deficiencies as this would allow the early tackling of the origins of financial distress.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Enforcement actions and bank behavior |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Enforcement actions; banking supervision; capital; bank risk; bank performance |
Subjects: | G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G28 - Government Policy and Regulation G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G21 - Banks ; Depository Institutions ; Micro Finance Institutions ; Mortgages G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G01 - Financial Crises |
Item ID: | 43557 |
Depositing User: | Manthos Delis |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2013 09:23 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 16:42 |
References: | Baek, J., K. Bae, J. Kang and W. Liu. 2011. Do controlling shareholders’ expropriation incentives imply a link between corporate governance and firm value? Theory and evidence. Journal of Financial Economics. Forthcoming. Barth, J., G. Caprio and R. Levine. 2001. The regulation and supervision of banks around the world: a new database. World Bank Policy Research Paper 2588. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2006. International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards. Black, B. 2001. The legal and institutional preconditions for strong securities markets. UCLA Law Review 48: 781-855. Boyd, J, G. De Nicolo and A. Jalal. 2006. Bank risk-taking and competition revisited: New theory and new evidence. IMF Working Paper 297. Brous, P. and K. Leggett. 1996. Wealth effects of enforcement actions against financially distressed banks. Journal of Financial Research 19: 561-577. Brunmeier J. and N. Willardson. September 2006. Supervisory enforcement actions since FIRREA and FDICIA: arbitrary, draconian and inflexible or a model of regulatory restraint? The Region. Caprio, G., A. Demirgüç-Kunt and E. Kane. 2008. The 2007 meltdown in structured securitization: Searching for lessons, not scapegoats. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4756. Curry, T., J. O’Keefe, J. Coburn and L. Montgomery. 1999. Financial distressed banks: how effective are enforcement actions in the supervision process?. FDIC Banking Review 12: 1-18. Delis, M. and P. Staikouras. 2011. Supervisory effectiveness and bank risk. Review of Finance 15: 511-543. Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and E. Detragiache. 2011. Basel Core Principles and bank soundness: does compliance matter? Journal of Financial Stability 7: 179-190. Dewenter, K. and P. Malatesta. 2001. State-owned and privately owned firms: An empirical analysis of profitability, leverage, and labor intensity. American Economic Review 91: 320-334. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). 1997. Bank examination and enforcement. In History of the Eighties, Lessons for the Future – Vol. I (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), pp. 421-475. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). 1997b. The banking crises of the 1980s and early 1990s: summary and implications. In History of the Eighties, Lessons for the Future – Vol. I (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), pp. 3-86. Flannery, M. and J. Rangan. 2008. What caused the bank capital built-up of the 1990s? Review of Finance 12: 391-429. Furfine, C. 2001. Bank portfolio allocation: the impact of capital requirements, regulatory monitoring, and economic conditions. Journal of Financial Services Research 20: 33-56. Garcia, G. 2010. Failing prompt corrective action. 2010. Journal of Banking Regulation 11: 171-190. Gilbert, R. 1991. Supervision of under-capitalized banks: is there a case for change?. Federal Bank of St. Louis Review 73: 16-30. Gilbert, R. 1993. Implications of annual examinations for the bank insurance fund. Federal Bank of St. Louis Review 75: 35-51. Gilbert, R. and M. Vaughan. 2001. Do depositors care about enforcement actions? Journal of Economics and Business 53: 283-311. Graham F. and J. Homer. 1988. Bank failure: an evaluation of the factors contributing to the failure of national banks, in The Financial Services Industry in the Year 2000: Risk and Efficiency, Proceedings from the Conference on Bank Structure and Competition, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, pp. 405-435. Jordan, J., J. Peek and E. Rosengren. 1999. The impact of greater bank disclosure amidst a banking crisis. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper 1. Kane, E. 1989. Changing incentives facing financial services regulators. Journal of Financial Services Research 2: 265-274. Kaufman, G. 1995. FDICIA and bank capital. Journal of Banking and Finance 19: 721-722. Kroszner, R. 2000. The economics and politics of financial modernization. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review 6: 25-37. Kyriazidou, E. 1997. Estimation of a panel data sample selection model. Econometrica 65: 1335-1364. La Porta R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and W. Vishny. 2006. What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance 61: 1-32. Milne, A. 2002. Bank capital regulation as an incentive mechanism: implications for portfolio choice. Journal of Banking and Finance 26: 1-23. Mishkin F. 2000. Prudential supervision: why is it important and what are the issues?. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7926. Nevo, A. and A. Rosen. 2012. Identification with imperfect instruments. Review of Economics and Statistics 94: 659-671. Norden, L. and M. Weber. 2010. Credit line usage, checking account activity, and default risk of bank borrowers. Review of Financial Studies 23: 3665-3699. Peek, J. and E. Rosengren. 1995. Bank regulation and the credit crunch. Journal of Banking and Finance 19: 679-692. Seballos L. and J. Thomson. 1990. Underlying causes of commercial bank failures in the 1980s. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland Economic Commentary. Slovin, M., M. Sushka and J. Polonchek. 1999. An analysis of contagion and competitive effects at commercial banks. Journal of Financial Economics 54: 197-225. Swindle, C., 1995. Using CAMEL ratings to evaluate regulator effectiveness at commercial banks. Journal of Financial Services Research 9: 123-141. US General Accounting Office (GAO). 1991. Bank supervision: Prompt and forceful regulatory actions needed. Report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Financial Institutions Supervision, Regulation and Insurance, Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs, House of Representatives, available at http://www.gao.gov/products/ GGD-91-69. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/43557 |