Explaining the Patenting Propensity: A Regional Analysis using EPO-OECD Data

Cozza, Claudio and Schettino, Francesco (2013): Explaining the Patenting Propensity: A Regional Analysis using EPO-OECD Data.

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to study empirically the patenting propensity at the European regional level. To do that we use the OECD-REGPAT dataset, that includes patent applications made by European inventors and applicants to EPO in the time-span 1978-2011. Explanatory variables on R&D and human capital are extracted from EUROSTAT and OECD databases. In order to reduce biases we use patent applications by region of the inventor, as its linkage to the territory is stronger than using the region of the applicant. Analyzing the data, we sketch out the existence of a deep uneven distribution both in patent applications and R&D expenditure. Richer regions in terms of GDP – generally those of central-western Europe – show higher level of both private and public R&D expenditure as well as a consistent share of the whole European patent applications in last decades. As a consequence, eastern (and to a minor extent southern) European regions report harmful outcomes in terms of both variables. Thus, following the approach of Cincera (1997, 2005) we explain the determinants of patenting propensity using a regional panel data. Our main results substantially confirm the key role of R&D expenditure on patenting activity: mainly the business-enterprises component, but also the government sector one. Moreover, human capital variables – such as the share of human resources employed in high tech industries, and the number of highly qualified workers in science and technology occupations – show a positive relationship with patenting propensity. On the other side, average enterprise size seems not to play a determinant role on patent applications.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Patents, Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, EPO, R&D
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K29 - Other; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O34 - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Caballero and Jaffe (1993),How High are the Giants’ Shoulders: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Spillovers and Creative Destruction in a Model of Economic Growth, in Olivier Jean Blanchard and Stanley Fischer, editors, NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1993, Volume 8 MIT Press (1993) Cincera (1997), Patents, R&D, And Technological Spillovers At The Firm Level: Some Evidence From Econometric Count Models For Panel Data, Journal Of Applied Econometrics, 12: 265-280.

Cincera (2005), The link between firms’ R&D by type of activity and source of funding and the decision to patent, Working paper DULBEA, Research series, N◦05-10.RS, April

Cooke, Uranga, and Etxebarria (1997). Regional Innovation Systems: Institutional and Organizational Dimensions, Research Policy, 26(4-5), 475-491.

Cozza, Paci and Perani (2012), Ownership and Execution of Regional Corporate R&D – Methodological Hints from the Italian Case, Eurasian Business Review, Vol. 2, No. 1

Hall and Ziedonis (2001), The Patent Paradox Revisited: An Empirical Study of Patenting in the U.S. Semiconductor Industry, 1979-1995, RAND Journal of Economics, 32 (2001), 1 (Spring), 101-28.

Hall, Link and Scott (2003), Universities as Research Partners, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 85, issue 2, pages 485-491

Hall, Toma and Torrisi (2007) The Market Value of Patents and R&D: Evidence from European Firms, NBER Working Paper 13426.

Harhoff, Narin, Scherer and Vopel (1999) Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 81: 511-515.

Hausman, Hall and Griliches (1984), Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship, Econometrica, 52: 909-938.

Hausman, Hall and Griliches (1986), Patents and R&D: is there a lag?, International Economic Review, 27: 265-283.

Henderson, Jaffe and Trajtenberg (2005), Patent Citations and the Geography of Knowledge Spillovers: A Reassessment: Comment, American Economic Review, vol. 95, issue 1, pages 461-464

Jaffe, Trajtenberg and Hall (2005), Market Value and Patent Citations: A First Look, No E00-277, Economics Working Papers from University of California at Berkeley

Lanjouw and Schankerman (2004) Patent Quality and Research Productivity: Measuring Innovation with Multiple Indicators, Economic Journal, 114:441-465.

Montalvo (1993), Patents and R&D at the firm level: a new look, Revista Espanola de Economia, 67, 81.

Narin and Breizman (1995), Inventive productivity, Research Policy, 24 (1995): 507-519

Patel and Pavitt (1991), Large Firms in the Production of the Worlds Technology - an Important Case of Non-Globalization, Journal of International Business Studies, 22, 1-21.

Schettino (2007), Us Patent Citations Data and Industrial Knowledge Spillovers, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, vol. 16, issue 8, pages 595-633

Yuen (2009), Patent laws and innovation in China, International, Review of Law and Economics 29 (2009) 304–313.

Van Zeebroeck and van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie (2011), The vulnerability of patent value determinants, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 20:3, 283-308

Verspagen, Criscuolo and Narula (2005), Role of home and host country innovation systems in R&D internationalisation: a patent citation analysis, Economics of innovation and new technology, 14, 417-433.