El Fasiki, Hamza (2013): The Family Business in Collectivist Societies: Traits and Implications. Published in: Tharawat Magazine , Vol. 18, (June 2013): pp. 20-23.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_48819.pdf Download (138kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The way a family business functions is greatly influenced by the structure of the society it originates from. A wide range of literature has recently attempted to emphasise that it is, therefore, not possible to create global family business theories without taking into consideration the remarkable differences that cultural and traditional context can make. Our attention is drawn to the role that collectivism plays in influencing family culture and the way in which it manifests in entrepreneurial activity throughout family generations. Collectivist societies and the family culture experienced by its individuals can have an important influence on the family business and the entrepreneurship it fosters. The term “collectivist society” describes how individuals often behave while following imposed sets of social patterns. On a smaller scale the same paradigm applies to family businesses where the family and the business life cycles complete each other. Hamza El Fasiki, Head of Research and Studies at the Moroccan Center for Innovation and Social Entrepreneurship, describes the impact of the collectivist society on the family business paradigm and explores how organisational and family culture become one, and the power hierarchy that ensures.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Family Business in Collectivist Societies: Traits and Implications |
English Title: | The Family Business in Collectivist Societies: Traits and Implications |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Family Business, Family Culture, Collectivism, Organisational Culture, Culture |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A3 - Collective Works > A39 - Other M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M0 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z10 - General Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z19 - Other |
Item ID: | 48819 |
Depositing User: | Hamza El Fasiki |
Date Deposited: | 05 Aug 2013 01:52 |
Last Modified: | 26 Sep 2019 10:00 |
References: | Hermans, P., 2000. The Expression of Guilt in Moroccan Culture: A Reaction to the Ethnographic View Held by Western Authors and Educators on Moroccan Adolescents. Moroccan Cultural Studies Journal, Fez, (November 2nd) Pelto, O. J., 1968. The Differences between “Tight” and “Loose” Societies. TransAction Churchill, N.C. & K. J. Hatten, 1987. Non-Market-Based Transfers of Wealth and Power: A Research Framework for Family Business. American Journal of Small Business, vol. 11, n° 3. Colette, H., et al,. 2003. Entrepreneurship Education and Training. Burlington: Ashgate. Paisner, M. B., 1999). Sustaining The Family Business. New York: Perseus Books Carsrud, A. & M. Brännback, 2012. Understanding Family Businesses: Undiscovered Approaches, Unique Perspectives, and Neglected Topics. New York: Springer. Goodall, S., et al, 2010. Business and Professional Communication in the Global Workplace. London: Wadsworth. Hofstede, G., 1991. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, Intercultural Cooperation and its Importance for Survival. London: McGraw Hill. McCollom, M., et al, 1997. Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business. Harvard Business School Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/48819 |