An endogenous growth model with quality ladders and consumers’ heterogeneity

Marasco, Antonio (2002): An endogenous growth model with quality ladders and consumers’ heterogeneity. Unpublished.

Abstract

This paper develops an endogenous growth model with quality ladders where consumers heterogeneity is assumed and is modelled through non homothetic preferences. We show that in such a model, unlike mainstream quality ladders models, the steady state equilibrium is characterised by a duopoly were the state of the art technology and the one immediately below it are both able to survive and thrive, under given conditions for the income distribution. In the words of Schumpeter, this model delivers only partial creative destruction. Furthermore, we show that under duopoly, an increase in the degree of income inequality, raises the intensity of research activities and the growth rate of the economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Institution: Lahore University of Management Sciences
• Language: English
• Keywords: Industrial Organization; Income Distribution; Technological Change; Innovation; Growth
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General; O - Economic Development, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Technological Change; Research and Development > O30 - General; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure and Pricing > D40 - General

References

[1] Aghion, P., Howitt, P., 1992. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction. Econometrica 60, 323-351. [2] Aghion, P., Harris, C., Vickers, J., 1997. Competition and Growth with Step-by-step Innovation: an Example. European Economic Review XLI, 771-782. [3] Aghion, P., Howitt, P.,1998. Endogenous Growth Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. [4] Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., 2005. Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics May, 701-728. [5] Gabszewicz, J.J., Thisse, J.-F., 1979. Price Competition, Quality and Income Disparities. Journal of Economic Theory 22, 327-338. [6] Galor , O., and Moav O., 2004. From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development. Review of Economic Studies 71(4), 1001-1026 [7] Grossman, G.M., Helpman, E., 1991. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. MIT Press Cambridge, MA. [8] Li, Chol-Won, 2003. Inequality and Growth: A Schumpeterian Perspective. Mimeo, University of Glasgow. [9] Mani, A., 2001. Income Distribution and the Demand Constraint. Journal of Economic Growth, 6, 107-133. [10]Romer P., 1990. Endogenous Technological Change. Journal of Political Economy 98. S71 - S102 [11]Shaked, A., Sutton, J., 1982. Relaxing Price Competition through Product Differentiation. Review of Economic Studies XLIX, 3-13. [12]Zweimuller, J., Brunner, J.K., 2005. Innovation and Growth with Rich and Poor Consumers. Metroeconomica, 56(2), 233-262