Amegashie, J. Atsu (2008): Autocratic rule in ethnically-diverse societies.
Download (173kB) | Preview
Richer and more educated citizens demand better governance than poorer citizens. They participate more in the political process, are more difficult to buy off, and tend to have the financial resources to support a revolt. An autocrat who is politically insecure may therefore not invest in income-enhancing goods like education, roads, the rule of law, etc. This argument is not new. The novelty of this paper is to argue that ethnic diversity and discrimination exacerbate an autocrat’s fear of the negative effect of high income or income-enhancing investments like public education on his political survival. The combination of ethnic diversity and the fear of survival results in low economic performance in ethnically-diverse autocracies. I show that under such circumstances, the proportion of national income that the autocrat appropriates to himself is increasing in the degree of ethnic diversity. An implication is that in such ethnically-diverse societies, kleptocrats may be better off with a bigger share of a smaller national income than they are with a smaller share of a bigger national income. Previous empirical work provides some support for my theory. I discuss applications and limitations of my results.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Autocratic rule in ethnically-diverse societies|
|Keywords:||autocracy, ethnic diversity, kleptocracy, public capital, selectorate|
|Subjects:||H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P16 - Political Economy
|Depositing User:||J. Atsu Amegashie|
|Date Deposited:||03. Jun 2008 07:43|
|Last Modified:||11. Feb 2013 21:09|
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J.A. (2000). Political losers as a barrier to economic development. American Economic Review 90: 126-130.
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J.A. (2006). Economic backwardness in political perspective. American Political Science Review 100: 115-131.
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, J.A. (2008). Persistence of elites, power, and institutions. American Economic Review 98: 267-93.
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A., and Verdier, T. (2004). Kleptocracy and divide-and-rule: a model of personal rule. Journal of the European Economic Association 2: 162-192.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W. (1999). Public goods and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 1243-1284.
Alesina, A., and La Ferrara, E. (2000). Participation in Heterogeneous Communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 847–904.
Alesina, A., and La Ferrara, E. (2005). Ethnic Diversity and Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Literature 43: 762–800.
Ayittey, G. (1992). Africa betrayed. New York: St. Martin Press.
Barro, R. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy 107: 158-183.
Besley, T., and Kudamatsu, M. (2007). Making autocracy work. Unpublished manuscript, London School of Economics.
Bluedorn, J.C. (2001). Can democracy help? Growth and ethnic divisions. Economics Letters 70: 121-126.
Callaghy, T.M. (1984). The state-society struggle: Zaire in comparative perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.
Collier, P. (2000). Ethnicity, politics, and economic performance. Economics and Politics 12: 225-245.
Collier, P. (2001). Implications of ethnic diversity. Economic Policy 16: 129-166.
De Mesquita, B. B., Smith, A., Siverson, R.M., and Morrow, J.D. (2003). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MIT press.
Easterly, W., and Levine, R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1203-1250.
Evans, P.B. (1995). Embedded autonomy: states and industrial transformation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Glaeser, E.L., Ponzetto, G., and Shleifer, A. (2007). Why does democracy need education. Journal of Economic Growth 12: 77-99.
Gugerty, M.K, and Miguel, E. (2005). Ethnic Diversity, Social Sanctions, and Public Goods in Kenya. Journal of Public Economics 89: 2325-2368.
Jones, B.F., and Olken, B. (2005). Do leaders matter? National leadership and growth since World War II. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120: 835-864.
Lipset, S.M. (1959). Some social requirements of democracy: economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53: 69-105.
Ljunqvist, L., and Sargeant, T.J. (2004). Recursive macroeconomic theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
McGuire, M.C., and Olson, M. (1996). The economics of autocracy and majority rule: the Invisible hand and the use of force. Journal of Economic Literature 34: 72-96.
Montalvo, J.G., and Reynol-Querol, M. (2002). Why ethnic fractionalization? Polarization, ethnic conflict, and growth. Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Unpublished manuscript.
Montalvo, J.G., and Reynol-Querol, M. (2005). Polarization, potential conflict, and civil wars. American Economic Review 95: 796-816.
Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, democracy, and development. American Political Science Review 87: 567-576.
Padro I Miquel (2007). The control of politicians in divided societies: the politics of fear. Review of Economic Studies 74: 1259-1274.
Putnam, R.D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century. Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 137–174.
Robinson, J.A. (2001). When is a state predatory? Harvard University, Cambridge. Processed.
Robinson, J.A., and Torvik, R. (2005). White elephants. Journal of Public Economics 89: 197-210.
Sargent, T.J. (1987). Dynamic macroeconomic theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Shen, L. (2007). When will a dictator be good? Economic Theory 31: 343-366.
Stokey, N.L., Lucas, R.E., with Prescott, E.C. (1989). Recursive methods in economic dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.