Negative Network Externalities in Two-Sided Markets: A Competition Approach

Kurucu, Gokce (2007): Negative Network Externalities in Two-Sided Markets: A Competition Approach.

Abstract

Consider a firm advertising in a job matching agency with the aim of employing the most qualified workers. Its chances of success would be higher for a smaller number of competitor firms advertising in the same job matching agency, i.e. careerbuilder.com. How would the resulting competitive behavior among the firms which are advertising to this job matching agency affect the agency’s optimal pricing behavior? I analyze the optimal market structures and pricing strategies of a monopolist platform in a two-sided market setup in which the agents on each side prefer the platform to be less competitive on their side; that is, a market with negative intra-group network externalities. I find that the equilibrium market structure varies with the extent of negative externalities. If the market’s negative network externalities are substantial, that is, if an agent’s disutility given the size of the agent pool on his side is high (enough), then the profit-maximizing strategy for the matchmaker will be to match the highest types of one side with all of the agents on the other side, by charging a relatively high price from the former side and allowing free entrance for the agents of the latter side. However, if the network externalities on one side are not substantial, then the matchmaker will maximize profits by matching an equal number of agents from each side. This paper thus provides an explanation of the asymmetric pricing schedules in two-sided markets where the matchmaker uses a one-program pricing schedule.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: two-sided market; externalities
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L11 - Production, Pricing, and Market Structure ; Size Distribution of Firms; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D42 - Monopoly; L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L12 - Monopoly ; Monopolization Strategies

References

Ambrus, A., Argenziano, R., 2004 Network Markets and Consumer Coordination, CESifo GmbH, CESifo Working Paper Series: CESifo Working Paper No: 1317.

Bellaflamme, P., Toulemonde, E., 2007 Negative Intra-Group Network Externalities In Two- Sided Markets, CESifo Working Paper.

Caillaud, B., Jullien, B., 2003 Chicken and Egg: Competition among Intermediation Service Providers, Rand Journal of Economics., 34(2), 521-552.

Damiano, E., Li, H., 2004 Competing Matchmaking, Working paper, University of Toronto.

Ellison, G., Fudenberg, D., Mobius, M., 2004 Competing Auctions, Journal of the European Economic Association., 2(1) 30-66, 03.

Farrell, J. and Saloner, G., 1985 Standardization, Compatibility and Innovation, Rand Journal of Economics., 16(1) 70-83.

Jullien, B., 2001 Competing in Network Industries: Divide and Conquer, mimeo, IDEI and GREMAQ, University of Toulouse n. 112.

Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., 1994 Systems Competition and Network Effects, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(2) 93-115.

Katz, M.L. and Shapiro, C., 1985 Network Externalities, Competition and Compatibility, American Economic Review, 75(3) 424-40.

Rochet, J.C. and Tirole, J., 2006 Two-Sided Markets: A Progress Report, Rand Journal of Economics, 37(3) 645-67. 24