Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation: Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge.

Peschl, Markus F. (2006): Triple-loop learning as foundation for profound change, individual cultivation, and radical innovation: Construction processes beyond scientific and rational knowledge. Published in: Constructivist Foundations , Vol. 2, No. 2-3 (2007): pp. 136-145.

Abstract

Purpose: How does new knowledge or profound change come about and which processes of construction are involved? This article aims at developing an epistemological as well as methodological framework which is capable of explaining how profound and radical change can be brought about in various contexts, such as in individual cultivation, in organizations, in processes of radical innovation, etc. The concept of emergent innovation will be developed—it is based on the triple-loop learning strategy and the U-theory approach which opens up a perspective how the domain of scientific/rational knowledge, constructivism, and wisdom could grow together more closely. Design/Structure: This article develops a strategy which is referred to as “triple-loop learning”, which is not only the basis for processes of profound change, but also brings about a new dimension in the field of innovation, learning, and knowledge dynamics: the existential realm and the domain of wisdom. A concrete approach realizing the triple-loop learning strategy is presented. The final section shows, how these concepts can be interpreted in the context of the constructivist approach and how they might offer some extensions to this paradigm. Findings: The process of learning and change has to be extended to a domain which concerns existential issues as well as questions of wisdom. Profound change can only happen, if these domains are taken into consideration. The triple-loop learning strategy offers a model fulfilling this criterion. It is an “epistemo-existential strategy” for profound change on various levels. Conclusions: The (cognitive) processes and attitudes of receptivity, suspension, redirecting, openness, deep knowing, as well as “profound change/innovation from the interior” turn out to be core concepts in this process of emergent innovation. They are compatible with constructivist concepts. Glasersfeld’s concept of functional fitness is carried to an extreme in the suggested approach of profound change and finds an extension in the existential domain.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Double-loop learning, individual cultivation, emergent innovation, (radical) innovation, knowledge creation, knowledge society, personality development, presencing, profound change, triple-loop learning, U-theory, wisdom
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

Argyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1996) Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Addison-Wesley: Redwood City, CA.

Aristoteles (1985) Nikomachische Ethik. Felix Meiner Verlag: Hamburg.

Bechtel, W. & Abrahamsen, A. (2002) Connectionism and the mind. Parallel processing, dynamics, and evolution in networks. Blackwell Publishers: Malden, MA; Oxford, UK.

Boden, M. A. (ed.) (1990) The philosophy of artificial intelligence. Oxford University Press: New York.

Bohm, D. (1996) On dialogue. Routledge: London; New York.

Bortoft, H. (1996) The wholeness of nature. Goethe’s way of science. Floris Books: Edinburgh.

Clark, A. (1997) Being there. Putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Depraz, N., Varela, F. J. & Vermersch, P. (2003) On becoming aware. A pragmatics of experiencing. John Benjamins Publishing Company: Amsterdam / Philadelphia.

European Commission (2004) Innovation management and the knowledge-driven economy. Brussels, European Commission, Directorate-general for Enterprise.

Foerster, H. v. (1973) On constructing a reality. In: Preiser, W. F. E. (ed.) Environmental design research. Hutchinson & Ross: Stroudsburg, PA,

Friedman, T. L. (2006) The world is flat. A brief history of the twenty-first century, Ferrar. Straus and Giroux: New York.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (1984) An introduction to radical constructivism. In: Watzlawick, P. (ed.) The invented reality. Norton: New York, pp. 17–40.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (1989) Cognition, construction of knowledge, and teaching. Synthese 80: 121–141.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (1991) Knowing without metaphysics. Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In: Steier, F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. SAGE Publishers: London; Newbury Parg, CA, pp. 12–29.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (1995) Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press: London.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (1996) Radikaler Konstruktivismus. Ideen, Ergebnisse, Probleme. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt/M.

Glasersfeld, E. v. (2000) Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit und des Begriffes der Objektivität. In: Foerster, H. v., Glasersfeld, E. v., Hejl, P. M., Schmidt, S. J. & others (eds.) Einführung in den Konstruktivismus. 5th ed. Piper: München, pp. 9–39.

Hebb, D. O. (1949) The organization of behavior; a neuropsychological theory. Wiley: New York.

Holsapple, C. W. (ed.) (2003) Handbook of knowledge management 1: Knowledge matters. Springer: Berlin, New York.

Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Isaacs, W. (1999) Dialogue and the art of thinking together: A pioneering approach to communicating in business and life. Doubleday Currency: New York.

Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Krogh, G. v., Ichijo, K. & Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling knowledge creation. How to unlock the mystery of tacit knowledge and release the power of innovation. Oxford University Press: New York.

Levi, P. (1997) Collective intelligence: mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus Books: Cambridge, MA.

Maturana, H. R. (1970) Biology of cognition. In: Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (eds.) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel Pub.: Dordrecht, Boston, pp. 2–60.

Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (eds.) (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel Pub.: Dordrecht, Boston.

Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995) The knowledge creating company. How Japanese companies manage the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Nonaka, I. & Toyama, R. (2003) The knowledge-creating theory revisited: knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research and Practice 1: 2–10.

Peschl, M. F. (2001) Constructivism, cognition, and science. An Investigation of its links and possible shortcomings. Foundations of Science 6: 125–161.

Peschl, M. F. (2003) Structures and diversity in everyday knowledge. From reality to cognition and back. In: Gadner, J., Buber, R. & Richards, L. (eds.) Organising Knowledge. Methods and case studies. Palgrave Macmillan: Hampshire, pp. 3–27.

Peschl, M. F. (2005) Acquiring basic cognitive and intellectual skills for informatics. Facilitating understanding and abstraction in a virtual cooperative learning environment. In: Micheuz, P., Antonitsch, P. & Mittermeir, R. (eds.) Innovative concepts for teaching informatics. Ueberreuter: Wien, pp. 86–101.

Peschl, M. F. (2006) Modes of knowing and modes of coming to know. Knowledge creation and knowledge co-construction as socio-epistemological engineering in educational processes. Constructivist Foundations 1: 111–123.

Peschl, M. F. (2006a) Raum für Innovation und Knowledge Creation. Lernende Organisation 29: 56–64.

Piaget, J. (1992) Biologie und Erkenntnis. Über die Beziehung zwischen organischen Regulationen und kognitiven Prozessen. Fischer: Frankfurt/M.

Polanyi, M. (1966) The tacit dimension. Doubleday: Garden City, N.Y.

Rifkin, J. (2004) The end of work. Putnam: New York.

Rosch, E. (1999) Primary knowing: when perception happens from the whole field. http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Rosch-1999.pdf (date of download: 06.05.2005).

Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. & Williams, R. J. (1986) Learning internal representations by error propagation. In: Rumelhart, D. E. & McClelland, J. L. (eds.) Parallel Distributed Processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Foundations. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, pp. 318–361.

Scharmer, C. O. (2000) Presencing: Learning from the future as it emerges. On the tacit dimension of leading revolutionary change. http://www.dialogonleadership.org/PresencingTOC.html (date of download: 02.02.2005).

Scharmer, C. O. (2001) Self-transcending knowledge. Sensing and organizing around emerging opportunities. Journal of Knowledge Management 5: 137–150.

Scharmer, C.O. (2007) Theory U. Leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Cambridge, MA: Society for Organizational Learning.

Schein, E. H. (1993) On dialogue, culture and organizational learning. Organization Dynamics 22: 44–51.

Senge, P. M. (1990) The fifth discipline. The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday: New York.

Senge, P., Scharmer, C. O., Jaworski, J. & Flowers, B. S. (2004) Presence. Human purpose and the field of the future. Society for Organizational Learning: Cambridge, MA.

UNESCO (2005) Towards knowledge societies. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO World Report).

Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. & Rosch, E. (1991) The embodied mind: cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.

Varela, F. (2000) Three gestures of becoming aware. http://www.dialogonleadership.org/Varela-2000.pdf (date of download: 27.04.2005).