Pashchenko, Svetlana and Porapakkarm, Ponpoje (2020): Value of Life and Annuity Demand.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_100794.pdf Download (362kB) | Preview |
Abstract
How does the value of life affect annuity demand? To address this question, we construct a portfolio choice problem with three key features: i) agents have access to life-contingent assets, ii) they always prefer living to dying, iii) agents have non-expected utility preferences. We show that as utility from being alive increases, annuity demand decreases (increases) if agents are more (less) averse to risk rather than to intertemporal fluctuations. Put differently, if people prefer early resolution of uncertainty, they are less interested in annuities when the value of life is high. Our findings have two important implications. First, we get better understanding of the well-known annuity puzzle. Second, we argue that the observed low annuity demand provides evidence that people prefer early rather than late resolution of uncertainty.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Value of Life and Annuity Demand |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | annuities, value of a statistical life, portfolio choice problem, life-contingent assets, longevity insurance |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G11 - Portfolio Choice ; Investment Decisions G - Financial Economics > G2 - Financial Institutions and Services > G22 - Insurance ; Insurance Companies ; Actuarial Studies |
Item ID: | 100794 |
Depositing User: | Svetlana Pashchenko |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jun 2020 02:56 |
Last Modified: | 19 Jun 2020 02:56 |
References: | [1] Attanasio, O., Weber, G., 1989. ”Intertemporal Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Euler Equation for Consumption”. Economic Journal, 99, 59-73 [2] Andersson, H., Treich, N., 2011, “The Value of a Statistical Life” in “Handbook in Transport Economics”, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK. [3] Bansal, R., Yaron, A., 2004. ”Risks for the Long-Run: A Potential Resolution of Asset Pricing Puzzles.” Journal of Finance, 54, 1481-1509 [4] Bommier, A., Harenberg, D.,Le Grand, F., O’Dea, C., 2020. Recursive Preferences, the Value of Life, and Household Finance. Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper N 2231 [5] Bommier, A., Villeneuve, B., 2012. Risk Aversion and the Value of Risk to Life. Journal of Risk and Insurance, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 77-103 [6] Brown, A., Kim, H., 2014 ”Do Individuals Have Preferences Used in Macro-Finance Models? An Experimental Investigation”, Management Science, 60, 939-958 [7] Chen, X., Favilukis, J., Ludvigson, S., 2013.”An Estimation of Economic Models with Recursive Preferences”. Quantitative Economics, 4, 39-83 [8] Cordoba, J.C., Ripoll, M., 2017, “Risk Aversion and the Value of Life”, Review of Economic Studies, vol.84(4), pp. 1472–1509. [9] De Nardi, M., 2004. ”Wealth Inequality and Intergenerational Links”. Review of Economic Studies, 71(7), 743-768 [10] De Nardi, M., French, E., Jones, J., 2010., Why Do the Elderly Save? Journal of Political Economy, 118(1), pp.39-75. [11] De Nardi, M., Pashchenko, S., Porapakkarm, P., 2018. The Lifetime Cots of Bad Health. NBER Working Paper No. 23963 [12] Dushi, I., Webb, A., 2004. Household Annuitization Decisions: Simulations and Empirical Analysis. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance 3(2), 109-143 [13] Epstein, L., Zin, S, 1989. Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework, Econometrica, 57(4), pp 937-969 [14] Eslami K., Karimi, S., 2019. Health Spending: Luxury or Necessity? Mimeo, Ryerson University [15] Fonseca, R., Michaud, P-C., Kapteyn, A., Galama, T., 2020. Accounting for the Rise in Health Spending and Longevity. Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming [16] Guvenen, F., 2009. A Parsimonious Macroeconomic Model for Asset Pricing. Econometrica, Vol. 77, N6, pp 1711-1750 [17] Hall, R., Jones, C., 2007, “The Value of Life and the Rise in Health Spending”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.122(1) , pp. 39-72. [18] Hansen, L., Sargent, T., 1995. Discounted Linear Exponential Quadratic Gaussian Control. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40(5), pp 968–971. [19] Huang, D., Shaliastovich, I., 2013. ”Risk Adjustment and the Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty: Evidence from Options Markets”. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania [20] Hubbard, G., Skinner, J., Zeldes, S., 1994. The Importance of Precautionary Motives in Explaining Individual and Aggregate Saving. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 40(1), pp. 59 [21] Inkman J., Lopes, P., Michaelides, A., 2011. How Deep is the Annuity Market Participation Puzzle? Review of Financial Studies, 24(1), pp. 279-319. [22] Kellerman, S., Lehman,J., Lansky, A., Stevens, M., Hecht, F., Bindman, A., Wortley, P., 2002. ”HIV testing within at-risk populations in the United States and the reasons for seeking or avoiding HIV testing”. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, 31, 202-210 [23] Kaplan, G.,Violante, G. 2014. A Model of the Consumption Response to Fiscal Stimulus Payments. Econometrica, 82(4), pp 1199-1239. [24] Kreps, D., Porteus, E., 1978. ”Temporal Resolution of Uncertainty and Dynamic Choice Theory”. Econometrica, 46, 185-200 [25] Krueger, D., Ludwig, A., 2019. Optimal Taxes on Capital in the OLG Model with Uninsurable Idiosyncratic Income Risk. Mimeo, University of Pennsylvania [26] Lockwood, L., 2012. Bequest Motives and the Annuity Puzzle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 15(2), pp. 226-243 [27] Love. D., 2017. Countercyclical Retirement Accounts. European Economic Review, Vol 98, pp 38-42 [28] Malloy, C., Moskowitz, T., Vissing-Jorgensen, A., 2009. ”Long-Run Stockholder Consumption Risk and Asset Returns”. Journal of Finance, LXIV, N 6 [29] Meissner, T., Pfeiffer, P., 2018. ”Measuring Preferences Over the Temporal Resolution of Consumption Uncertainty”. Unpublished manuscript [30] Murphy, K., Topel, R., 2006, “The Value of Health and Longevity”, Journal of Political Economy, vol.114, N51, pp. 871-904 [31] Mitchell, O. S., Poterba, J.M., Warshawsky, M.J., Brown, J.R., 1999. New Evidence on the Money’s Worth of Individual Annuities. American Economic Review 89(5), pp.1299-1318 [32] Nygaard, N., 2019. Causes and Consequences of Life Expectancy Inequality. Mimeo, University of Houston [33] Ozkan, S., 2017. Preventive vs. Curative Medicine: A Macroeconomic Analysis of Health Care over the Life Cycle. Mimeo, University of Toronto. [34] Oster, E., Shoulson, D., Dorsey, R., 2013. ”Optimal Expectations and Limited Medical Testing: Evidence from Huntington Disease”, American Economic Review, 103, 804-830 [35] Pashchenko, S., 2013. Accounting for Non-Annuitization. Journal of Public Economics, 98, pp.53-67 [36] Pashchenko, S., Porapakkarm, P., 2019. Accounting for Social Security Claiming Behavior. Mimeo, University of Georgia [37] Robinson, L., 2007. How US Government Agencies Value Mortality Risk Reductions, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 1(2), pp.283-299. [38] Rosen, S., 1988, “The Value of Changes in Life Expectancy”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, vol.I, pp.285-304. [39] Traeger, C., 2014, “Capturing Intrinsic Risk Attitude”, mimeo, University of California Berkely [40] Viscusi, K., 1993, “The Value of Risks to Life and Health”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol.31(4), pp.1912-1946. [41] Vissing-Jorgensen, A., Attanasio, O., 2003. “Stock Market Participation, Intertemporal Substitution and Risk Aversion”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 93, 383-391 [42] Weil, P., 1990, “Non-expected Utility in Macroeconomic?”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol.105, pp.29-42. [43] Yaari, M., 1965. ”Uncertain Lifetime, Life insurance , and the Theory of the Consumer”. Review of Economic Studies, 32, 137-150 [44] Yogo, M., 2006, “A Consumption-based Explanation of Expected Stock Returns”, Journal of Finance, vol.LXI, N2, pp.539-580. [45] Yogo, M., 2016. Portfolio Choice in Retirement: Health Risk and the Demand for Annuities, Housing, and Risky Assets. Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 80, pp 17-34. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/100794 |