Hierarchies and decision-making in groups: Experimental evidence

Donata, Bessey (2020): Hierarchies and decision-making in groups: Experimental evidence.

Abstract

In this study, I investigate differences in decision-making outcomes for groups under different hierarchies using an experimental approach. Many decisions in firms, households, and other contexts are not taken by individuals, but by groups. In addition, most groups, especially in firms, are characterized by hierarchical organization structures. While research in management, sociology and psychology has been investigating the role of hierarchies for a long time, there is a lack of experimental economic research on the effect of various group structures or hierarchies on decision-making and its quality. I compare the choices of groups in Holt and Laury (2002) type lottery choices and in intellective tasks in five different group types: a group without hierarchy, a hierarchy by age (where the oldest group member decides), by merit (where the winner in a financial literacy quiz decides), by chance (where a randomly determined leader decides) and by election (where an elected leader decides). Experimental results suggest that there are no differences in the number of safe choices between the different hierarchy types. However, groups with a leader assigned on the basis of merit perform better in intellective tasks.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: hierarchies; group decision-making; lottery choice; risk attitude; intellective tasks
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior

References

Allais, M., 1953. Le Comportement De l'Homme Rationnel Devant Le Risque: Critique Des Postulats et Axiomes de l'Ecole Americaine. Econometrica. 21(4): 503-546.

Baillon, A., et al., 2013. Group Decision Rules and Group Rationality under Risk. Working Paper, Erasmus University of Rotterdam.

Baker, R. J., Laury, S. and Williams, A. W., 2008. Comparing Small-Group and Individual Behaviour in Lottery-Choice Experiments. Southern Economic Journal. 75(2): 367–382.

Bateman, I. and Munro, A., 2005. An Experiment on Risky Choice amongst Households, The Economic Journal: 115(502), 176-189.

Bone, J., Hey, J. and Suckling, J., 1999. Are Groups More or Less Consistent Than Individuals? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 18(1): 63-81.

Bunderson, J. S., Van Der Vegt, G. S., Cantimur, Y., & Rink, F., 2016. Different views of hierarchy and why they matter: hierarchy as inequality or as cascading influence, Academy of Management Journal. 59(4): 1265-1289.

Carlston, D., Levine, J., & Smith, E. (2013). Group Cognition: Collective Information Search and Distribution, in: The Oxford Handbook of Social Cognition: Oxford University Press.

Charness, G., Karni, E. and Levin, D., 2007. Individual and Group Decision Making Under Risk: An Experimental Study of Bayesian Updating and Violations of First-Order Stochastic Dominance, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 35(2): 129-148.

Charness, G. and Sutter, M., 2012. Groups Make Better Self-Interested Decisions, The Journal of Economic Perspectives. 26(3): 157-176.

Curşeu, P. L., Jansen, R. J., & Chappin, M. M., 2013. Decision rules and group rationality: cognitive gain or standstill? PLoS One. 8(2): e56454.

Deck, C., et al., 2012. Risk-Taking Behavior: An Experimental Analysis of Individuals and Dyads, Southern Economic Journal: 79(2), 277-299.

Ertac, S. and Gurdal, M. Y., 2012. Deciding to Decide: Gender, Leadership and Risk-Taking in Groups, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organisation: 83(1), 24-30.

Falk, A., & Heckman, J. J. (2009). Lab experiments are a major source of knowledg e in the social sciences, Science. 326(5952): 535-538.

Feddersen, T. and Pesendorfer, W. (1998). Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting, American Political Science Review. 92(1): 23-35.

Granovetter, M., (2005). The Impact of Social Structure on Economic Outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19(1): 33-50.

Halevy, N., et al., (2011). A Functional Model of Hierarchy Why, How, and When Vertical Differentiation Enhances Group Performance. Organisational Psychology Review, 1(1), 32-52.

Holt, C. A. and Laury, S. K., (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects, American Economic Review. 92(5): 1644-1655.

Huang, Y., & Wang, L. (2010). Sex differences in framing effects across task domain, Personality and Individual Differences. 48(5): 649-653.

Kerr, N. L., MacCoun, R. J. and Kramer, G. P., (1996). Bias in Judgment: Comparing Individuals and Groups, Psychological Review. 103(4): 687-719.

Kerr, N. L. and Tindale, R. S., (2004). Group Performance and Decision Making, Annual Review of Psychology. 55: 623-655.

Kugler, T., Kausel, E. E., & Kocher, M. G. (2012). Are groups more rational than individuals? A review of interactive decision making in groups, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 3(4): 471-482.

Laughlin, P.R., (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in Social Psychology, 127-155, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Long, J. S. and Freese, J., (2014). Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata, 3rd Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.

Maciejovsky, B., Sutter, M., Budescu, D. V., & Bernau, P. (2013). Teams make you smarter: How exposure to teams improves individual decisions in probability and reasoning tasks, Management Science. 59(6): 1255-1270.

Magee, J. C., & Galinsky, A. D. (2008). Social hierarchy: The self‐reinforcing nature of power and status, Academy of Management Annals. 2(1): 351-398.

Masclet, D., Colombier, N., Denant-Boemont, L., & Loheac, Y. (2009). Group and individual risk preferences: A lottery-choice experiment with self-employed and salaried workers, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 70(3): 470-484.

Messner, M. & Polborn, M. K. (2004). Voting On Majority Rules, Review of Economic Studies. 71(1): 115-132.

Mihet, R. (2013). Effects of Culture on Firm Risk-Taking: A Cross-Country and Cross-Industry Analysis, Journal of Cultural Economics. 37(1): 109-151.

Rockenbach, B., Sadrieh, A. and Mathauschek, B., (2007). Teams Take the Better Risks, Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation. 63(3): 412-422.

Ronay, R., Greenaway, K., Anicich, E. M., & Galinsky, A. D. (2012). The path to glory is paved with hierarchy: When hierarchical differentiation increases group effectiveness, Psychological Science. 23(6): 669-677.

Shupp, R. S. and Williams, A. W. (2008). Risk Preference Differentials of Small Groups and Individuals, The Economic Journal: 118(525), 258-283.

Tindale, R. S., & Winget, J. R. (2019). Group decision-making. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, Oxford.