Harashima, Taiji (2020): Why Is Risk Aversion Essentially Important for Endogenous Economic Growth?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_101011.pdf Download (979kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The familiar condition for a balanced growth path indicates that a household’s attitude toward risk plays a significantly important role for endogenous economic growth, but the mechanism behind this importance has not been sufficiently examined. In this paper, I show that in the process of endogenous growth, the decreasing rate of marginal utility is kept constant and the household’s quickness of response to new technologies determines the growth rate. Quickness of response to new technology and degree of risk aversion are quite similar. Given a constant decreasing rate of marginal utility, if on average households in a country are more cautious and respond less quickly to new technologies, firms in that country will invest less in new technologies. As a result, the endogenous economic growth rate of the country will be lower than that of others. If people respond more quickly, the growth rate will be higher.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Why Is Risk Aversion Essentially Important for Endogenous Economic Growth? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Decreasing rate of marginal utility; Endogenous economic growth; Risk aversion |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General |
Item ID: | 101011 |
Depositing User: | Taiji Harashima |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2020 09:55 |
Last Modified: | 17 Jun 2020 09:56 |
References: | Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1992) “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction,” Econometrica, Vol. 60, pp. 323–351. Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt (1998) Endogenous Growth Theory, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Becker, Robert A. (1980) “On the Long-run Steady State in a Simple Dynamic Model of Equilibrium with Heterogeneous Households,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 95, No. 2, pp. 375–382. Burton, Erin Lindsey (2015) “The impact of risk aversion on economic development in Portugal” Perspectives on Business and Economics, Vol. 33, Paper 4. Dinopoulos, Elias and Peter Thompson (1998) “Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, pp. 313–335. Eicher, Theo S. and Stephen J. Turnovsky (1999) “Non-Scale Models of Economic Growth,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 109, pp. 394–415. Ellison, Martin and Joseph Pearlman (2011) “Saddlepath Learning,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 146, No. 4, pp. 1500–1519. Evans, George W. and Honkapohja, Seppo (2001) Learning and Expectations in Macroeconomics, Princeton and Oxford, Princeton University Press. García-Peñalosa, Cecilia and Jean-François Wen (2008) “Redistribution and Entrepreneurship with Schumpeterian Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp 57–80. Ghiglino, Christian and Nicole Tabasso (2016) “Risk Aversion in a Model of Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, Vol. 64, pp. 30–40. Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman (1991) Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press. Harashima, Taiji (2010) “Sustainable Heterogeneity: Inequality, Growth, and Social Welfare in a Heterogeneous Population,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 24233. Harashima, Taiji (2012) “Sustainable Heterogeneity as the Unique Socially Optimal Allocation for Almost All Social Welfare Functions,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 40938. Harashima, Taiji (2013) “An Asymptotically Non-Scale Endogenous Growth Model,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 44393. Harashima, Taiji (2017) ““Sustainable Heterogeneity: Inequality, Growth, and Social Welfare in a Heterogeneous Population,” in Japanese, Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, Vol. 51, No. 1, pp. 31–80. (原嶋 耐治「持続可能な非均質性―均質ではない構成員からなる経済における不平等、経済成長及び社会的厚生―」『金沢星稜大学論集』第51巻第1号31~80頁) Harashima, Taiji (2018) “Do Households Actually Generate Rational Expectations? “Invisible Hand” for Steady State,” MPRA (The Munich Personal RePEc Archive) Paper No. 88822. Harashima, Taiji (2019a) “Do Households Actually Generate Rational Expectations? “Invisible Hand” for Steady State,” in Japanese, Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 49–70. (原嶋 耐治「家計は実際に合理的期待を形成して行動しているのか―定常状態への「見えざる手」―」『金沢星稜大学論集』第52巻第2号49~70頁) Harashima, Taiji (2019b) “An Asymptotically Non-Scale Endogenous Growth Model,” in Japanese, Journal of Kanazawa Seiryo University, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 71–86. (「漸近的に規模効果が消失する内生的経済成長モデル」『金沢星稜大学論集』第52巻第2号71~86頁) Jones, Charles I. (1995) “R&D-Based Models of Economic Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, pp. 759–784. Jones, Charles I. (1999) “Growth: With or Without Scale Effects?” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 89, No. 2, pp. 139–144. Kortum, Samuel S. (1997) “Research, Patenting, and Technological Change,” Econometrica, Vol. 65, pp. 1389–1419. Lucas, Robert E Jr. (1972) “Expectations and the Neutrality of Money,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp.103–124. Lucas, Robert E. (1988) “On the Mechanics of Economic Development,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 22, pp. 3–42. Marcet, Albert and Thomas J. Sargent (1989) “Convergence of Least Squares Learning Mechanisms in Self-referential Linear Stochastic Models,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 337–368. Muth, John F. (1961) “Rational Expectations and the Theory of Price Movements,” Econometrica, Vol. 29, No. 3, pp. 315–335. Peretto, Pietro (1998) “Technological Change and Population Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 3, pp. 283–311. Peretto, Pietro and Sjak Smulders (2002) “Technological Distance, Growth and Scale Effects,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 112, pp. 603–624. Romer, Paul M. (1986) “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 94, pp. 1,002–1037. Romer, Paul M. (1987). “Growth Based on Increasing Returns Due to Specialization,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 77, pp. 56–72. Romer, Paul M. (1990) “Endogenous Technological Change,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 98, pp. S71–S102. Sargent, Thomas J., David Fand and Stephen Goldfeld (1973) “Rational Expectations, the Real Rate of Interest, and the Natural Rate of Unemployment,” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol. 1973, No. 2, pp 429–480. Segerstrom, Paul (1998) “Endogenous Growth without Scale Effects,” American Economic Review, Vol. 88, pp. 1290–1310. Young, Alwyn (1998) “Growth without Scale Effects,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 106, pp. 41–63. Zeira, Joseph (2011) “Innovations, Patent Races and Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 135–156. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/101011 |