Is “The General Law of Capitalist Accumulation” Still Valid? An Analysis Based on Direct and Indirect Marxian Effects

Bahçe, Serdal (2019): Is “The General Law of Capitalist Accumulation” Still Valid? An Analysis Based on Direct and Indirect Marxian Effects.

Abstract

Marx asserts that capital accumulation has been sample accompanied by the accumulation of industrial reserve army and surplus population. Contemporarily, this expansion has been fed by two tendencies. First, the change in the technical composition of capital makes a part of waged employment redundant. Second, migration-induced-growth of labor force has enlarged the size of industrial reserve army. In this respect, labor force growth itself is a function of accumulation/growth rather than vice versa. We call the first tendency as “direct Marxian effect” while the second one is “indirect Marxian effect”. For a list of 60 countries, this study estimates the direct and indirect Marixan elasticity of industrial reserve army and its components to accumulation/growth. The results indicate that “the General Law of Capitalist Accumulation” holds for the majority of countries.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Industrial reserve army, capital accumulation, labor force, migration, indirect Marxian effect, direct Marxian effect
• Subjects: B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B1 - History of Economic Thought through 1925 > B14 - Socialist ; Marxist; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J21 - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J6 - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers

References

Andereggen, A. 1986. The Turkish “Lumpenproletariat”: West Germany’s Industrial reserve Army. German Life and Letters 39(4): 314-322.

Bellamy Foster, J., McChesney, R.W. and R.J. Jonna. 2011. The Global Reserve Army of Labour and the New Imperialism. Monthly Review.

Brezis, E.S. and W. Young. 2003. The new views on demographic transition: a reassessment of Malthus’s and Marx’s approach to population. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 10(1): 25-45.

Castles, S. and G. Kosack. 1972. “The Function of Labour Immigration in Western European Capitalism”, New Left Review, May/June.

Choi, A. H. 2004. Migrant Workers in Macao: Labour and Globalization, City University of Hong Kong Southeast Asia research Centre Working paper no. 66.

Daly, H. 2011. A Marxian-Malthusian view of poverty and development. Population Studies: A Journal of Demography 25(1): 25-37.

De Angelis, M. 2001. Marx and primitive accumulation: The continuous character of capital’s “enclosures”. The Commoner 2:1-22.

Harvey, D. 2003. New Imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

Hill, I.E.J. 2014. The Rhetorical Transformation of the Masses from Malthus’s “Redundant Population” into Marx’s “Industrial Reserve Army”. Advances in the History of Rhetoric 17(1): 8-97.

Hollander, S. 1984. Marx and Malthusianism. American Economic Review 74(1): 139-151.

International Migration Organization [IOM]. 2015. 2015 Global Migration Trends Factsheet [https://publications.iom.int/system/files/global_migration_trends_2015_factsheet.pdf].

Jonna, R.J. and J. Bellamy Foster .2016. Marx’s Theory of Working-Class Precariousness. Monthly Review.

Kapsos, S. 2005. Employment Intensity of Growth: Trends and Macroeconomic Determinants. ILO Employment Strategy Papers No. 2005/12

Marx, K. 1973 [1857]. Grundrisse New York: Vinatge Books.

Marx, K. 1990 [1867]. Capital I. Hammondsworth: Penguin.

McIntyre, M. 2011. Race, Surplus Population and the Marxist Theory of Imperialism. Antipode 43(5): 1489-1515.

McIntyre, M. and H.J. Nast. 2011. Bio(necro)polis: Marx, Surplus Populations, and the Spatial Dialectics of Reproduction and “Race”. Antipode, 43(5): 1465-1488.

Meek, R.L. 1954. Malthus – Yesterday and Today. Science and Society 18(1): 21-51.

Neilson, D. and T. Stubbs. 2011. Relative Surplus Population and Uneven Development in the Neoliberal Era: Theory and Empirical Application. Capital & Class 35(3): 435-453.

Neto, N. N.G. and C. M. Germer .2013. The recent evolution of the Brazilian labor market from the perspective of the concept of the industrial reserve army. Revisita Ciências do Trabalho 1(1): 128-152.

Perelman, M. 2000. The Invention of Capitalism. London: Duke University Press.

Prtaschke, J. and E. Morlicchio. 2012. Social Polarisation, the Labour Market and Economic Restructuring in Europe: An Urban Perspective. Urban Studies 49(9): 1891-1907.

Rosdolsky, R. 1977. The Making of Marx’s Capital. London: Pluto Press.

Sharma, N.R. 1997. Birds of Prey and Birds Of Passage: The Movement of Capital and the Migration of Labour. Labour, Capital and Society 30(1): 8-38.

Sinha, A. 1998. Hollander's 'Marx and Malthusianism': A Critique. History of Economics Review 28(1): 104-112. United Nations [UN] .2016. International Migration Report 2015: Highlights [http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/publications/migrationreport/docs/MigrationReport2015_Highlights.pdf].

Wray, R. 2001. Did the Rising Tide Eliminate Our "Surplus" Population?”. Journal of Economic Issues. 35(2): 525-531.