International Portfolio Inflows to GCC Markets. Are There any General Patterns?

Balli, Faruk and Osman, Mohammad and Louis, Rosmy J. (2008): International Portfolio Inflows to GCC Markets. Are There any General Patterns?

Abstract

In this paper, we document the main factors underlying the foreign portfolio inflows to Gulf Corporation Council countries (hereafter GCC) by employing a recently published database of cross-country portfolio holdings by the International Monetary Fund. We find that bilateral factors such as trade volume and debt to GDP ratio between the source and GCC (host) countries play a truly significant role in determining the volume of cross border portfolio inflows to GCC markets. Particularly, there is a strong correlation between trade volume and the volume of portfolio inflows. This connection becomes even stronger over time. Moreover, GCC members’ stable fiscal position (lower debt to GDP ratio) is practically one of the important determinants of the volume of portfolio inflows to GCC markets. Specifically, for the international bond holders, the foremost motivation for investing cross borders is the absence of default risk and the higher return in comparison to other countries. We have also found that the extent of openness in capital account transactions and the income level of source country are additional factors that help to explain the volume of foreign portfolio inflows to GCC members. Last but not least, although there is a remarkable increase in the volume of the international portfolio inflows to GCC countries, there also exists a “GCC bias”, a huge share of the portfolio inflows to GCC markets is coming from the GCC countries. This bias is the notable consequence of the high level financial and economic integration that characterizes the GCC countries as they are heading towards a monetary union. A similar bias occurs in European Union markets as well.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capital Market Integration, GCC Portfolio Bias, Economic Integration, Bilateral Linkage
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy; F - International Economics > F4 - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance > F41 - Open Economy Macroeconomics; F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F36 - Financial Aspects of Economic Integration

References

Adjaout, K., Laura, B., Danthine, J., Fischer, A., Hamaui, R., & Portes, R. (2002). EMU and portfolio adjustment. CEPR Policy Paper No:5.

Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., & Volosovych, V. (2005). Why doesnt capital flow from rich to poor countries? An empirical investigation. Review of Economics and Statistics 90,347–368.

Anderton, F., & Moneta, F. (2004). Understanding impact of the external dimension on the Euro Area: Trade, capital flows and other international macroeconomic linkages. European Central Bank, Working Paper No:2.

Balli, F., & Sørensen, B. (2005). Impact of the EMU on channels of risk sharing between member countries. University of Houston Working Paper.

Bernoth, K., Hagen, J., & Schuknecht, L. (2004). Sovereign risk Premia in the European government bond market. European Central Bank, Working Paper No:2.

Cooper, I. A., & Kaplanis, E. (1994). Home bias in equity portfolios, inflation hedging, and international capital market equilibrium. Review of Financial Studies 7, 45–60.

Coval, J. D., & Moskowitz T.D. (1999). Home bias at home: Local equity preference in domestic portfolios. Journal of Finance 54, 2045–2073.

Domowitz, I., Glen J., & Madhavan, A. (2001). Liquidity, volatility and equity trading costs across countries and over time. International Finance 4, 221–255.

Chinn, M. & Hiro I. (2005). What matters for financial development? capital controls, institutions, and interactions. Journal of Development Economics 81, 163–192.

Chinn, M. & Hiro I. (2007). A new measure of financial openness. UC Santa Cruz SCCIE Working Paper.

Denning, K. C., & Chow, K. V. (1992). The symmetry and stability of word equity markets: Getting to the issue on international portfolio diversification. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 2, 35–58.

Fasano, U., & Iqbal, Z. (2003). GCC Countries: from oil dependence to diversification, International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.

Foad, H. (2007). Equity home bias in the EMU. San Diego State Working Paper.

Forbes, K. J., & Chinn, M. (2004). A Decomposition of global Linkages in financial markets over time. Review of Economics and Statistics 86, 705–722.

French, K., & Poterba, J. (1991). International diversification and international equity markets. American Economic Review 81, 222–226.

Grubel, H. L. (1968). Internationally diversified Portfolios: Welfare Gains and Capital Flows. American Economic Review 58, 1299–1314.

Iqbal, Z., & Ugo F. (2003). Gulf Cooperation Council: Challenges on the road to a monetary union. Box 1.5, World Economic Outlook, September, IMF, Washington DC.

Lane, P. (2005.) Global Portfolios and EMU. ECB Working Paper No:553.

Lane, P.,& Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2001). The external wealth of nations: Measures of foreign assets and liabilities for industrial and developing nations. Journal of International Economics 55, 263–294.

Lane, P., & Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2005). The International equity holdings of Euro Area investors. The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series No:104.

Lane, P., & Milesi-Ferretti, G.M. (2008). International investment patterns. IMF Working Paper No:134. Also Review of Economics and Statistics forthcoming.

Lewis, K. (1995). Puzzles in international financial markets, in: Gene Grossman and Kenneth Rogoff, eds. Handbook of International Economics North Holland, Amsterdam.

Lewis, K. (1996). What explain the apparent lack of international consumption risk sharing? Journal of Political Economy 104, 267–297.

Lewis, K. (1999). Trying to explain home bias in equities and consumption. Journal of Economic Literature 37, 571–608.

Mann, C., & Meade E. (2003). Home bias, transactions costs, and prospects for the Euro. in W.C. Hunter, G.G. Kaufman, and M. Pomerleano (eds.): Asset Price Bubbles: The Implications for Monetary, Regulatory, and International Policies, Cambridge: MIT Press.

M`elitz, J., & Fr´ed´eric Z. (1999). Interregional and international risk sharing and lessons for EMU. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 51, 149–88.

Obstfeld, M., & Rogoff K. (2001). The six major puzzles in international macroeconomics: Is there a common cause? Center for International and Development Economics Research (CIDER) Working Papers C:00-112, University of California at Berkeley.

Portes, R. & Rey, H. (2005). The determinants of cross border equity flows. Journal of International Economics 65, 269–296.

Sørensen, B. E., Wu, Y.T., Yosha, O., & Zhu,Y. (2007). Home bias and international risk sharing: Twin puzzles separated at birth. Journal of International Money and Finance 26, 587–613.

Sturm, M., & Siegfried N. (2005). Regional monetary integration in the members states of the gulf cooperations council. Occasional Paper Series No:31, European Central Bank.

Tesar, L., & Werner, I. (1995). Home bias and high turnover. Journal of International Money and Finance 14, 467–492.

Warnock, F. E. (2002). Home bias and high turnover reconsidered. Journal of International Money and Finance 21, 795–805.