Rational Choice Function Implementation for the German Stock Market Analysis

Mullat, Joseph E. (2020): Rational Choice Function Implementation for the German Stock Market Analysis.

Abstract

A concept of a kernel was re-visited for stock market analysis using monotone choice functions. We focused on indicators of purchases and sales on the German stock market, which have an advantage over others, giving a higher dynamics of changes for each such a specific change, which was called significance level.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: indicators, credentials, monotonic, system, kernel
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C82 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Macroeconomic Data ; Data Access

References

1. Aizerman, M.A. and A.V. Malishevski, 1981,”Some Aspects of the General Theory of Best Option Choice,” Translated from Avtomatika i Telemekhanika, No. 2, pp. 65-83, February, 1981. Original article submitted September 5, 1980.

2. Arrow, K.J., 1959, "Rational Choice functions and orderings," Economica, 26, No. 102, 121-127.

3. Chernoff, H., 1954, "Rational selection of decision functions," Econometrica, 22, No. 3, 422-443.

4. Jamison, D.T. and L J. Lau, 1973, "Semiorders and the theory of choice," Econometrica, 41, No. 5, 901-912.

4. Mullat, J.E., a) 1971, “ON A MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE FOR CERTAIN FUNCTIONS OF SETS,” in: Notes on Data Processing and Functional Analysis, Proceedings of the Tallinn Polytechnic Institute (in Russian), Series A, No. 313, Tallinn Polytechnic Institute , pp. 37-44;

b) 1976, “EXTREMAL SUBSYSTEMS OF MONOTONIC SYSTEMS, 1,” Avtom, Telemekh., No. 5, pp. 130 –139, (in Russian).

c) 1995, Mathematical Social Sciences 30, pp. 195-205.