A Political-Economy Analysis of the Provision of Urban Anti-Crime Technologies in a Model With Three Cities

Batabyal, Amitrajeet and Kourtit, Karima and Nijkamp, Peter (2019): A Political-Economy Analysis of the Provision of Urban Anti-Crime Technologies in a Model With Three Cities.

Abstract

We use a theoretical political-economy model with three cities and analyze three questions. First, should police in these cities have access to contentious crime fighting technologies such as facial recognition software? We describe a condition involving benefit, cost, and spatial spillover terms which tells us when the police ought to be provided with this technology. Second, if police are to be offered this technology then what are the properties of a policy regime that provides this technology in a decentralized way? We identify a condition that depends only on benefit and cost terms which tells us when this technology is to be made available in the cities in a decentralized way. Finally, what are the properties of a policy regime that provides the technology in a centralized way with equal cost sharing by the cities? We obtain two conditions involving benefit and spatial spillover terms that describe scenarios in which (i) the technology is provided with majority voting in a city even though it is inefficient to do so and (ii) it is efficient to provide the technology in a city but majority voting will lead to this technology not being provided.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Centralization, Decentralization, Political-Economy, Technology, Urban Crime
• Subjects: K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K42 - Illegal Behavior and the Enforcement of Law; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R50 - General

References

Andreas, P., and Price, R. 2001. From war fighting to crime fighting: Transforming the American national security, International Studies Review, 3, 31-52.

Andrejevic, M., and Volcic, Z. 2019. “Smart” cameras and the operational enclosure. Forthcoming, Television and New Media.

Ariel, B., Farrar, W.A., and Sutherland, A. 2015. The effect of police body-worn cameras on use of force and citizens’ complaints against the police: A randomized controlled trial, Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 509-535.

Bacchini, F., and Lorusso, L. 2019. Race, again: How face recognition technology reinforces racial discrimination, Journal of Information, Communication, and Ethics in Society, 17, 321-335.

Batabyal, A.A., Kourtit, K., and Nijkamp, P. 2019. Using local public goods to attract and retain the creative class: A tale of two cities, Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11, 571-581.

Boardman, A.E., Greenberg, D.H., Vining, A.R., and Weimer, D.L. 2018. Cost-Benefit Analysis, 5th edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

Boffey, D, 2020. EU eyes temporary ban on facial recognition in public places, The Guardian, 17 January, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2020/jan/17/eu-eyes-temporary-ban-on-facial-recognition-in-public-places. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Carr, J.B. 2017. Estimating the effects of police technology using quasi-experimental methods, Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 8, 360-368.

Conger, K., Fausset, R., and Kovaleski, S.F. 2019. San Francisco bans facial recognition technology, New York Times, 14 May, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/14/us/facial-recognition-ban-san-francisco.html. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Crumpler, W. 2020. How accurate are facial recognition systems---and why does it matter? Center for Strategic and International Studies, 14 April, https://www.csis.org/blogs/technology-policy-blog/how-accurate-are-facial-recognition-systems-%E2%80%93-and-why-does-it-matter. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Cullen, J.B., and Levitt, S.D. 1999. Crime, urban flight, and the consequences for cities, Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 159-169.

Feldstein, S. 2019. How artificial intelligence is reshaping repression, Journal of Democracy, 30, 40-52.

Friedman, B., and Ferguson, A.G. 2019. Here’s a way forward on facial recognition, New York Times, 31 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/31/opinion/facial-recognition-regulation.html. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Gates, K.A. 2002. Wanted dead or digitized: Facial recognition technology and privacy, Television and New Media, 3, 235-238.

Garicano, L., and Heaton, P. 2006. Computing crime: Information technology, police effectiveness, and the organization of policing, Center for Economic Policy Research Discussion Paper 5837.

Gibbons, S. 2004. The costs of urban property crime, Economic Journal, 114, F441-F463.

Greenberg, J., Luo, X., Oladi, R., and Shitovitz, B. 2002. (Sophisticated) stable sets in exchange economies, Games and Economic Behavior, 39, 54-70.

Gullo, K., and Lynch, J. 2019. When facial recognition is used to identify defendants, they have a right to obtain information about the algorithm used on them, EFF tells court, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 12 March, https://www.eff.org/ru/deeplinks/2019/03/when-facial-recognition-used-identify-defendants-they-have-right-obtain. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Hale, C. 1996. Fear of crime: A review of the literature, International Review of Victimology, 4, 79-150.

Heywood, J.S., and Weber, B. 2019. University-provided transit and crime in an urban neighborhood, Annals of Regional Science, 62, 467-495.

Hindriks, J., and Myles, G.D. 2013. Intermediate Public Economics, 2nd edition. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Kohfeld, C.W., and Sprague, J. 1988. Urban unemployment drives urban crime, Urban Affairs Review, 24, 215-241.

Kourtit, K. 2019. The New Urban World. Shaker, Aachen, Germany.

Lacoe, J., Bostic, R.W., and Acolin, A. 2018. Crime and private investment in urban neighborhoods, Journal of Urban Economics, 108, 154-169.

Lehmann, S. 2019. Urban Regeneration. Palgrave Macmillan, London, UK.

Lockwood, B. 2002. Distributive politics and the costs of centralization, Review of Economic Studies, 69, 313-337.

Lohr, S. 2018. Facial recognition is accurate, if you’re a white guy, New York Times, 9 February, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/09/technology/facial-recognition-race-artificial-intelligence.html. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Lynch, K.A. 1981. A Theory of Good City Form. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

Magnet, S.A. 2011. When Biometrics Fail. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.

Oladi, R. 2005. Stable tariffs and retaliations, Review of International Economics, 13, 205-215.

Orcutt, M. 2016. Are face recognition systems accurate? Depends on your race, MIT Technology Review, 6 July, https://www.technologyreview.com/2016/07/06/158971/are-face-recognition-systems-accurate-depends-on-your-race/. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Palmer, D., Warren, I., and Miller, P. 2012. ID scanning, the media, and the politics of surveillance in an Australian regional city, Surveillance and Society, 9, 293-309.

Price, G.N. 2016. Broken windows and crime in development challenged urban areas: Evidence from Jackson, Mississippi USA, Journal of Developing Areas, 50, 209-220.

Queally, J. 2019. Facial recognition data collected by U.S. customs agency stolen by hackers, Salon, 11 June, https://www.salon.com/2019/06/11/facial-recognition-data-collected-by-u-s-customs-agency-stolen-by-hackers/. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Rainwater, B. 2019. The 10 biggest issues U.S. mayors say they’re tackling in 2019, https://www.fastcompany.com/90363344/the-10-biggest-issues-u-s-mayors-say-theyre-tackling-in-2019. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Schippers, B. 2019. Facial recognition: Ten reasons you should be worried about the technology, The Conversation, 21 August, https://theconversation.com/facial-recognition-ten-reasons-you-should-be-worried-about-the-technology-122137, Accessed on 2 July 2020.

Selinger, E., and Hartzog, W. 2019. What happens when employers can read your facial expressions? New York Times, 17 October, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/10/17/opinion/facial-recognition-ban.html. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Silverman, J. 2017. Privacy under surveillance capitalism, Social Research, 84, 147-164. Slaight, J., and LeCloux, R. 2020. Facial recognition technology: Balancing safety and privacy, Wisconsin Policy Project, 3, 1-17, https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/misc/lrb/wisconsin_policy_project/facial_recognition_privacy_3_4.pdf. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Snoddon, T.R. 1994. Majority voting and local public goods: Does myopia matter? Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 17, 169-187.

Tulumello, S. 2018. The multisector nature of urban security and public safety: Crime prevention from local policy to policing in Lisbon (Portugal) and Memphis (the United States), Urban Affairs Review, 54, 1134-1169.

Valentino-DeVries, J. 2020. How the police use facial recognition, and where it falls short, New York Times, 12 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/12/technology/facial-recognition-police.html. Accessed on 1 July 2020.

Ward, B. 1976. The Home of Man. W.W. Norton and Company, New York, NY.

Weber, B. 2014. Can safe ride programs reduce urban crime? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 48, 1-11. White, J.D. 1996. The map of the city: Putting an Asian face on crime, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 52, 199-219.

Zizi, M. 2019. The flaws and dangers of facial recognition, Security Today, 1 March, https://securitytoday.com/articles/2019/03/01/the-flaws-and-dangers-of-facial-recognition.aspx. Accessed on 1 July 2020.