Gretszel, Piotr and Gurgul, Henryk and Lach, Łukasz and Schleicher, Stefan (2020): Testing for economic and environmental impacts of EU Emissions Trading System: A panel GMM approach.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102396.pdf Download (978kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The COVID 19 pandemic has had a great impact on the European Union economies in many aspects, also with regard to the discussion on the future of EU climate policy. The plan to rebuild and support the European Union's economy, which is currently under discussion at European governments summits, seems to place less emphasis on environmental issues as the main focus is being placed on a quick recovery of EU economy in the realms of global competition. One of the issues discussed in the EU's recovery plan following the COVID19 epidemic is the continued operation of the EU ETS. In this context, empirical research devoted to a thorough analysis of the impact of the EU emissions trading program is of particular importance. At the same time, current economic literature lacks any econometric analyzes devoted to the issues in question that would use detailed and reliable databases on EU ETS like the one provided by the Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change. The aim of this paper is to make a preliminary assessment of the effectiveness of the EU ETS in terms of reducing the actual emissions to the air while preserving economic growth of EU member states. The extensive empirical analysis is focused on examining the issues in question for different phases of the EU ETS and various groups of EU economies that vary in terms of economic development and the overall air pollutant emission.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Testing for economic and environmental impacts of EU Emissions Trading System: A panel GMM approach |
English Title: | Testing for economic and environmental impacts of EU Emissions Trading System: A panel GMM approach |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | EU ETS, GMM, panel data |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C33 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics |
Item ID: | 102396 |
Depositing User: | Dr Łukasz Lach |
Date Deposited: | 14 Aug 2020 10:29 |
Last Modified: | 14 Aug 2020 10:29 |
References: | 1. Alberola, E. (2006). The informational efficiency of the EU ETS: An empirical evaluation on the spot and futures prices, Working Paper, University of Paris, France. 2. Anderson, B., Di Maria, C. (2011). Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS. Environmental and Resource Economics 48: 83–103, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9399-9 3. Anderson, T.W., Hsiao, C. (1982). Formulation and Estimation of Dynamic Models Using Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 18(1):47–82. 4. Arellano, M., Bond, S. (1991). Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2):277–297. 5. Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-components Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1):29–51. 6. Bayer, P., Aklin, M. (2020). The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117:8804-8812. 7. Blundell, R., Bond, S. (1998). Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1):115–143. 8. Borghesi, S., Flori, A. (2018). EU ETS facets in the net: Structure and evolution of the EU ETS network. Energy Economics, 75:602-635, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.08.026 9. Bruyn, S., Schumacher, K., Vergeer, R. (2020). Ex-post investigation of cost pass-through in the EU ETS - an analysis for six industry sectors. Energy Economics, 91:104883, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104883 10. Burke, M. (2006). Drop in EU carbon prices baffles analysts. Environmental Science and Technology, 40:4534-4535. 11. Cañón-de-Francia, J., Garcés-Ayerbe, C. (2019). Factors and Contingencies for the “It Pays to Be Green Hypothesis”. The European Union’s Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) and Financial Crisis as Contexts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16: 2988, doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162988 12. European Commission (2015). EU ETS handbook, available at: https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/ets_handbook_en.pdf 13. Hansen, L.P. (1982). Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Esti-mators. Econometrica, 50(4):1029–1054. 14. Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., Rosen, H.S. (1988). Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56(6):1371–1395. 15. Jaraite, J., Di Maria, C. (2014). Did the EU ETS Make a Difference? An Empirical Assessment Using Lithuanian Firm-Level Data. CERE Working Paper 2, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2382663 16. Lin, W., Chen, J., Zheng, Y., Dai, Y. (2019). Effects of the EU Emission Trading Scheme on the international competitiveness of pulp-and-paper industry. Forest Policy and Economics, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102021 17. Marcu, A., Alberola, E., Caneill, JY., Mazzoni, M., Schleicher, S., Stoefs, W., Vailles, C., Vangenechten, D. (2018) State of the EU ETS Report Brussels: CEPS. 18. Marcu, A., Vangenechten, D., Alberola, E., Olsen, J., Caneill, JY., Schleicher, S., de Rafael, R. (2020) State of the EU ETS Report Brussels: CEPS. 19. Niblock, S.J., Harrison, J.L. (2011). European carbon markets and the global financial crisis, paper presented to the 2011 Global Business Conference, Sibenik, Croatia, 21-24 September. 20. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49(6): 1417–1426. 21. Sigmund, M., Ferstl, R. (2019). Panel vector autoregression in R with the package panelvar, The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2019.01.001 22. Verde, S.F., Graf, C., Jong, T. (2019). Installation entries and exits in the EU ETS: patterns and the delay effect of closure provisions. Energy Economics, 78:508-524, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.11.032 23. Wildgrub, T., Bocklet, J., Hintermayer, M., Schmidt, L. (2019). The reformed EU ETS - Intertemporal emission trading with restricted banking. Energy Economics, 84:104486 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104486 24. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A Finite Sample Correction for the Variance of Linear Efficient two-step GMM Estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126(1):25–51. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102396 |