Sinha, Avik and Sengupta, Tuhin and Saha, Tanaya (2020): Technology Policy and Environmental Quality at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries. Published in: Technological Forecasting and Social Change , Vol. 161, (2020): p. 120317.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_104249.pdf Download (437kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Since the inception of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the Asia Pacific countries are facing difficulties in attaining the SDG objectives, as maintaining the environmental quality has been a challenge for them. In this study, we have revisited the technology policies of these countries, and in doing so, we have tried to address the problem of environmental degradation, while addressing the issues of sustainable economic growth, clean and affordable energy, and quality education. In this pursuit, we have designed two indices for environmental degradation and technological advancement, and then analyzed the association between them following the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis. Following IPAT framework, and by using quantile approach, over a period of 1990-2017, we have found that the turnaround points of EKCs rise with the rise in quantiles, i.e. quantiles with low pollutions are having turnaround points within sample range, whereas quantiles with high pollutions are having turnaround points outside sample range. Using Rolling Window Heterogeneous Panel Causality test, unidirectional causality has been found running from technological advancement to environmental degradation. Following the results obtained from the analysis, we have tried to address the objectives of SDG 13, SDG 4, SDG 8, SDG 9, SDG 7, and SDG 10.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Technology Policy and Environmental Quality at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries |
English Title: | Technology Policy and Environmental Quality at crossroads: Designing SDG policies for select Asia Pacific countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sustainable Development Goals; Technology policy; Research and Development, Asia Pacific; Environmental quality |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 104249 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Avik Sinha |
Date Deposited: | 26 Nov 2020 13:15 |
Last Modified: | 26 Nov 2020 13:15 |
References: | Acemoglu, D., Aghion, P., Bursztyn, L., Hemous, D., 2012. The environment and directed technical change. American Economic Review, 102(1), 131-66. Adams, R., Kewell, B., Parry, G., 2018. Blockchain for good? Digital ledger technology and sustainable development goals. In Handbook of Sustainability and Social Science Research (pp. 127-140). Springer, Cham. Álvarez-Herránz, A., Balsalobre, D., Cantos, J.M., Shahbaz, M., 2017a. Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: Fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy, 101, 90-100. Alvarez-Herranz, A., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Shahbaz, M., Cantos, J.M., 2017b. Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels. Energy Policy, 105, 386-397. Apergis, N., Eleftheriou, S., Payne, J.E., 2013. The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Ecological Economics, 88, 57-66. Amri, F., Zaied, Y.B., Lahouel, B.B., 2019. ICT, total factor productivity, and carbon dioxide emissions in Tunisia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 212-217. Avom, D., Nkengfack, H., Fotio, H.K., Totouom, A., 2020. ICT and environmental quality in Sub-Saharan Africa: Effects and transmission channels. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120028. Balasubramanian, M., 2018. Climate change, famine, and low-income communities challenge Sustainable Development Goals. The Lancet Planetary Health, 2(10), e421-e422. Balcilar, M., Ozdemir, Z.A., Arslanturk, Y., 2010. Economic growth and energy consumption causal nexus viewed through a bootstrap rolling window. Energy Economics, 32(6), 1398-1410. Baumeister, S., 2018. We Are Still In! Conference report from the 2018 Ceres Conference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 196, 183-184. Bisbis, M.B., Gruda, N., Blanke, M., 2018. Potential impacts of climate change on vegetable production and product quality–A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1602-1620. Bojnec, Š., 2011. Enterprise internationalisation by foreign investments and technical cooperation. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 111(5), 697-713. Bond, T.C., Streets, D.G., Yarber, K.F., Nelson, S.M., Woo, J.H., Klimont, Z., 2004. A technology‐based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 109(D14). Breitung, J., 2001. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In Baltagi, B.H. (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 161–177. Breusch, T.S., Pagan, A.R., 1979. A simple test for heteroscedasticity and random coefficient variation. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 1287-1294. Chen, J., Gao, M., Mangla, S.K., Song, M., Wen, J., 2020. Effects of technological changes on China's carbon emissions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119938. Chirambo, D., 2016. Moving past the rhetoric: Policy considerations that can make Sino-African relations to improve Africa’s climate change resilience and the attainment of the sustainable development goals. Advances in Climate Change Research, 7(4), 253-263. Chudik, A., Pesaran, M.H., 2015. Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. Churchill, S.A., Inekwe, J., Smyth, R., Zhang, X., 2019. R&D intensity and carbon emissions in the G7: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 80, 30-37. Cranston, G.R., Hammond, G.P., 2012. Carbon footprints in a bipolar, climate-constrained world. Ecological Indicators, 16, 91-99. Dalton, M., o’Neill, B., Prskawetz, A., Jiang, L., Pitkin, J., 2008. Population aging and future carbon emissions in the United States. Energy Economics, 30(2), 642-675. De Rassenfosse, G., de la Potterie, B.V.P., 2009. A policy insight into the R&D-patent relationship. Research Policy, 38(5), 779-792. de Vries, G. J., Ferrarini, B., 2017. What accounts for the growth of carbon dioxide emissions in advanced and emerging economies? The role of consumption, technology and global supply chain participation. Ecological Economics, 132, 213-223. Dialoke, C.E., 2017. Refocusing Science and Technology Education in Nigeria: Implication for the Achievement of Sustainable Development Goals by 2030. Capital Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 141-148. Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A., 1994. Rethinking the environmental impacts of population, affluence and technology. Human Ecology Review, 1(2), 277–300. Dietz, T., Rosa, E.A., 1997. Effects of population and affluence on CO2 emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(1), 175–179. Dong, K., Sun, R., Dong, C., Li, H., Zeng, X., Ni, G., 2018. Environmental Kuznets curve for PM 2.5 emissions in Beijing, China: What role can natural gas consumption play?. Ecological Indicators, 93, 591-601. Dumitrescu, E.I., Hurlin, C., 2012. Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460. Ehrlich, P.R., Holdren, J.P., 1971. Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217. Figueres, C., Le Quéré, C., Mahindra, A., Bäte, O., Whiteman, G., Peters, G., Guan, D., 2018. Emissions are still rising: ramp up the cuts. Nature, 570, 27-30. Fisher-Vanden, K., Wing, I.S., 2008. Accounting for quality: Issues with modeling the impact of R&D on economic growth and carbon emissions in developing economies. Energy Economics, 30(6), 2771-2784. Fortune, G., 2019. The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production. Gable, S., Lofgren, H., & Osorio Rodarte, I. (2015). Trajectories for Sustainable Development Goals. World Bank Publications. Garrone, P., Grilli, L., 2010. Is there a relationship between public expenditures in energy R&D and carbon emissions per GDP? An empirical investigation. Energy Policy, 38(10), 5600-5613. Gelenbe, E., Caseau, Y., 2015. The impact of information technology on energy consumption and carbon emissions. Ubiquity, 2015(June), 1. Haines, A., Amann, M., Borgford-Parnell, N., Leonard, S., Kuylenstierna, J., Shindell, D., 2017. Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Climate Change, 7(12), 863. Herwartz, H., Siedenburg, F., 2008. Homogenous panel unit root tests under cross sectional dependence: Finite sample modifications and the wild bootstrap. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(1), 137–150. Hidalgo, A., Gabaly, S., 2012. Use of prediction methods for patent and trademark applications in Spain. World Patent Information, 34(1), 19-29. Hiller, M., Zahner, A., Harvey, K., Meyer, A., 2016. Green Climate Fund, Sustainable Development Goals, and energy access. In International Energy and Poverty (Vol. 192, No. 203, pp. 192-203). ROUTLEDGE in association with GSE Research. Imaz, M., Sheinbaum, C., 2017. Science and technology in the framework of the sustainable development goals. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 14(1), 2-17. Irandoust, M., 2016. The renewable energy-growth nexus with carbon emissions and technological innovation: Evidence from the Nordic countries. Ecological Indicators, 69, 118-125. Jarque, C.M., Bera, A.K., 1987. A test for normality of observations and regression residuals. International Statistical Review, 55(2), 163-172. Kedir, A.M., 2017. Environment and climate change in Africa in an era of sustainable development goals. In From Millennium Development Goals to Sustainable Development Goals (pp. 152-166). Routledge. Kelman, I., 2017. Linking disaster risk reduction, climate change, and the sustainable development goals. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 26(3), 254-258. Khan, A.N., En, X., Raza, M.Y., Khan, N.A., Ali, A., 2020. Sectorial study of technological progress and CO2 emission: Insights from a developing economy. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 151, 119862. Koenker, R., 2005. Quantile Regression. Cambridge University Press, New York. Ladan, M.T., 2018. Achieving Sustainable Development Goals Through Effective Domestic Laws and Policies on Environment and Climate Change. Environmental Policy and Law, 48(1), 42-63. Le Blanc, D., 2015. Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals as a network of targets. Sustainable Development, 23(3), 176-187. Lee, K.H., Min, B., 2015. Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534-542. Lee, K.H., Min, B., Yook, K.H., 2015. The impacts of carbon (CO2) emissions and environmental research and development (R&D) investment on firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 167, 1-11. Lemus, J., Marshall, G., 2018. When the clock starts ticking: Measuring strategic responses to TRIPS's patent term change. Research Policy, 47(4), 796-804. Lewis, N.S., 2016. Aspects of science and technology in support of legal and policy frameworks associated with a global carbon emissions-control regime. Energy & Environmental Science, 9(7), 2172-2176. Li, L., Hong, X., Peng, K. 2018. A spatial panel analysis of carbon emissions, economic growth and high-technology industry in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. Lu, W., Chau, K.W., Wang, H., Pan, W., 2014. A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: a critical review of empirical studies 2002–2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195-206. Major, D.C., Lehmann, M., Fitton, J., 2018. Linking the management of climate change adaptation in small coastal towns and cities to the Sustainable Development Goals. Ocean & Coastal Management, 163, 205-208. Mallapragada, D.S., Reyes-Bastida, E., Roberto, F., McElroy, E.M., Veskovic, D., Laurenzi, I.J., 2018. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of liquefied Marcellus shale gas used for international power generation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 672-680. Nicolai, S., Hoy, C., Berliner, T., Aedy, T., 2015. Projecting progress: reaching the SDGs by 2030. Available at: https://www.odi.org/publications/9895‐projecting‐progressreaching‐sdgs‐2030 Paramati, S.R., Sinha, A., Dogan, E., 2017. The significance of renewable energy use for economic output and environmental protection: evidence from the Next 11 developing economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(15), 13546-13560. Quéré, C.L., Andrew, R.M., Friedlingstein, P., Sitch, S., Pongratz, J., Manning, A.C., ... & Boden, T.A., 2018. Global Carbon Budget 2017. Earth System Science Data, 10(1), 405-448. Ramsey, J.B., 1969. Tests for specification errors in classical linear least‐squares regression analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 31(2), 350-371. Reckien, D., Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Lwasa, S., Tovar-Restrepo, M., Mcevoy, D., Satterthwaite, D., 2017. Climate change, equity and the Sustainable Development Goals: an urban perspective. Environment and Urbanization, 29(1), 159-182. Roberts, S.H., Axon, C.J., Goddard, N.H., Foran, B.D., Warr, B.S., 2019. Modelling socio-economic and energy data to generate business-as-usual scenarios for carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 980-997. Rodriguez, R.S., Ürge-Vorsatz, D., Barau, A.S., 2018. Sustainable Development Goals and climate change adaptation in cities. Nature Climate Change, 8(3), 181. Rosa, E.A., Dietz, T., 1998. Climate change and society: Speculation, construction and scientific investigation. International Sociology, 13(4), 421-455. Sachs, J.D., Schmidt‐Traub, G., Duran‐Delacre, D., Teksoz, K., 2017. SDG Index & Dashboards Report 2017. New York. Aailable at: http://www.sdgindex.org Sadorsky, P., 2009. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy policy, 37(10), 4021-4028. Shabani, Z.D., Shahnazi, R. 2019. Energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, information and communications technology, and gross domestic product in Iranian economic sectors: A panel causality analysis. Energy, 169, 1064-1078. Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Sinha, A., 2019. Foreign Direct Investment–CO2 Emissions Nexus in Middle East and North African countries: Importance of Biomass Energy Consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 603-614. Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168. Sharif, A., Baris-Tuzemen, O., Uzuner, G., Ozturk, I., Sinha, A., 2020a. Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey’s ecological footprint: Evidence from Quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102138. Sharif, A., Mishra, S., Sinha, A., Jiao, Z., Shahbaz, M., Afshan, S., 2020b. The renewable energy consumption-environmental degradation nexus in Top-10 polluted countries: Fresh insights from quantile-on-quantile regression approach. Renewable Energy, 150, 670-690. Sinha, A., Bhattacharya, J., 2016a. Environmental Kuznets curve estimation for NO2 emission: A case of Indian cities. Ecological indicators, 67, 1-11. Sinha, A., Bhattacharya, J., 2016b. Confronting environmental quality and societal aspects: an environmental Kuznets curve analysis for Indian cities. International Journal of Green Economics, 10(1), 69-88. Sinha, A., Bhattacharya, J., 2017. Estimation of environmental Kuznets curve for SO2 emission: A case of Indian cities. Ecological indicators, 72, 881-894. Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., 2019. Impact of energy mix on nitrous oxide emissions: an environmental Kuznets curve approach for APEC countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(3), 2613-2622. Sinha, A., Shah, M.I., Sengupta, T., Jiao, Z., 2020. Analyzing technology-emissions association in Top-10 polluted MENA countries: How to ascertain sustainable development by quantile modeling approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 267, 110602. Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., Sengupta, T., 2018. Renewable Energy Policies and Contradictions in Causality: A case of Next 11 Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 73-84. Song, M., Fisher, R., Kwoh, Y., 2018. Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. United Nations, 2018. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2018. Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2018 Van der Sanden, G., Foing, B., 2018. Mapping Synergies: Sustainable Development Goals and Research & Technology in Space Architecture and Human Spaceflight. European Planetary Science Congress, 12, 1260. Vélez-Henao, J.A., Vivanco, D.F., Hernández-Riveros, J.A., 2019. Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view. Energy Policy, 129, 1372-1381. Vicente, M.R., López, A.J., 2006. Patterns of ICT diffusion across the European Union. Economics Letters, 93(1), 45-51. Westerlund, J., Edgerton, D.L., 2008. A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 70(5), 665–704. World Bank, 2018. World Bank Indicators. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator Wolfram, P., Lutsey, N., 2016. Electric vehicles: Literature review of technology costs and carbon emissions. The International Council on Clean Transportation: Washington, DC, USA, 1-23. Wooldridge, J.M., 2002. Inverse probability weighted M-estimators for sample selection, attrition, and stratification. Portuguese Economic Journal, 1(2), 117-139. Yi, W., 2012. Empirical Study on Environmental Regulation, Technology Innovation and Carbon Emissions in China-Based on Cointegration and Granger Causality Analysis. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 6. Yusuf, R.O., Noor, Z.Z., Abba, A.H., Hassan, M.A.A., Din, M.F.M., 2012. Methane emission by sectors: a comprehensive review of emission sources and mitigation methods. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(7), 5059-5070. Zafar, M.W., Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., Sengupta, T., Qin, Q., 2020. How renewable energy consumption contribute to environmental quality? The role of education in OECD countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 268, 122149. Zhang, N., Wang, B., Chen, Z., 2016. Carbon emissions reductions and technology gaps in the world's factory, 1990–2012. Energy Policy, 91, 28-37. Zhang, N., Wang, B., Liu, Z., 2016. Carbon emissions dynamics, efficiency gains, and technological innovation in China’s industrial sectors. Energy, 99, 10-19. Zongzhi, L.G.L., 2010. The Impact of Population, Economy and Technology on Carbon Dioxide Emissions-A Study Based on Dynamic Panel Model. Population Research, 3, 004. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/104249 |