Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia

Sharma, Rajesh and Sinha, Avik and Kautish, Pradeep (2020): Does renewable energy consumption reduce ecological footprint? Evidence from eight developing countries of Asia. Published in: Journal of Cleaner Production (2020): p. 124867.

Abstract

Economic and demographic transitions led by the persistent increase in the per capita income have challenged the environmental conservation drive in most of the developing nations. Therefore, in recent years, policymakers emphasized the need for navigating the harmful impacts of economic growth endeavors on the established ecosystem. In this regard, the widespread usage of renewable energy solutions has helped in restoring the environmental quality in both developed and developing countries. Keeping this in mind, in the present study, we examined the long run and short-run impacts of per capita income, renewable energy, life expectancy, and population density on the ecological footprint in the eight developing countries of South and Southeast Asia from 1990-2015. In the selected nations, these variables appear to be the potential drivers of the ecological footprint. To calculate the common coefficients, we have employed the cross-sectional augmented autoregressive distributed lag (CS-ARDL) approach, as this approach handles the cross-sectional dependency issue efficiently and provides the short-run and long-run coefficients. The long-run results supported the need for low pollution-intense energy resources because the association between per capita income and ecological footprint is found N-shaped. Further, the study established that the increased use of renewable energy has significantly reduced the ecological footprint in the region. However, the increased population density has led to an increase in pollution emissions in these countries. Similarly, the impact of life expectancy on the ecological footprint is found positive but insignificant. Based on the findings, a multipronged policy framework has been designed, so that these nations can attain the objectives of certain sustainable development goals (SDGs).

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Ecological Footprints; Renewable Energy; Life Expectancy; Per Capita Income; Population Density; SDG
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

Abbasi, F., Riaz, K. (2016). CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach. Energy Policy 90, 102-114.

Acheampong, A., 2019. Modelling for insight: Does financial development improve environmental quality? Energy Economics 83, 156-179.

Afridi, M., Kehelwalatenna, S., Naseem, I., Tahir, M., 2019. Per capita income, trade openness, urbanization, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: an empirical study on the SAARC Region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (29), 29978-29990.

Agence-France-Presse., 2019. Faisalabad, Lahore in top 10 of world's most polluted cities list dominated by India. Dawn, https://www.dawn.com/news/1467997, Accessed date: 2 January 2020.

Alola, A., Bekum, F., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Dynamic impact of trade policy, economic growth, fertility rate, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on ecological footprint in Europe. Science of the Total Environment 685, 702-709.

Ang, J., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772-4778.

Apergis, N., Jebli, M., Youssef, S., 2018. Does renewable energy consumption and health expenditures decrease carbon dioxide emissions? Evidence for sub-Saharan Africa countries. Renewable Energy 127, 1011-1016.

Asian Development Bank., 2012. Ecological footprint and investment in natural capital in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank and World Wide Fund for Nature, Manila, Philippines.

Baloch, M., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F., Khan, D., 2020. Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: does globalization matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615.

Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Bekun, F., Etokakpan, M., Driha, M., 2019. A road to enhancements in natural gas use in Iran: a multivariate modelling approach. Resources Policy 64, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101485.

Baltagi, B., Bratberg, E., Holmas, T., 2005. A panel data study of physicians' labor supply: the case of Norway. Health Economics 14 (10), 1035-1045.

Bekun, F., Alola, A., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Toward a sustainable environment: nexus between CO2 emissions, resources rent, renewable and nonrenewable energy in 16-EU countries. Science of the Total Environment 657, 1023-1029.

Bekun, F., Emir, F., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Another look at the relationship between energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and economic growth in South Africa. Science of The Total Environment 655, 759-765.

Bello, M., Solarin, S., Yen, Y., 2018. The impact of electricity consumption on CO2 emission, carbon footprint, water footprint and ecological footprint: the role of hydropower in an emerging economy. Journal of Environmental Management 219, 218-230.

Benli, M., 2019. the long-run effects of trade and income on carbon emissions: evidence from heterogeneous dynamic panel of developing countries. Balkan and Near Eastern Journal of Social Sciences 5 (4), 51-58.

Bhattacharya, M., Churchill, S., Paramati, S., 2017. The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions. Renewable Energy 111, 157-167.

Biswas, A., and Tortajada, C., 2019. Water quality management: a globally neglected issue. International Journal of Water Resources 35 (6), 913-916.

Breusch, T., Pagan, A., 1980. The lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. The Review of Economic Studies 47 (1), 239-253.

Brueckner, M., Schwandt, H., 2014. Income and population growth. The Economic Journal 125 (589), 1653-1676.

Bulut, U., 2017. The impacts of non-renewable and renewable energy on CO2 emissions in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24 (18), 15416-15426.

Chen, T., 2001. The impact of mitigating CO2 emissions on Taiwan's economy. Energy Economics 23 (2), 141-151.

Chen, Y., Wang, Z., Zhong, Z., 2019. CO2 emissions, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy production and foreign trade in China. Renewable Energy 131, 208-216.

Chin, Y., De-Pretto, L., Thuppi, V., Ashfold, M., 2019. Public awareness and support for environmental protection-a focus on air pollution in peninsular Malaysia. PLoS ONE 14 (3), 1-21.

Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M., & Raissi, M. (2013). Debt, inflation and growth robust estimation of long-run effects in dynamic panel data models. Working Paper No. 162, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Chudik, A., Mohaddes, K., Pesaran, M., & Raissi, M. (2015). Long-run effects in large heterogeneous panel data models with cross-sectionally correlated errors. Working Paper No. 223, Globalization and Monetary Policy Institute, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas.

Danish, Hassan, S., Baloch, M., Mahmood, N., Zhang, J., 2019. Linking economic growth and ecological footprint through human capital and biocapacity. Sustainable Cities and Society 47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101516.

Danish, Ulucak, R., Khan, S., 2020. Determinants of the ecological footprint: role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society 54, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996.

Destek, M., Sarkodie, S., 2019. Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment 650, 2483-2489.

Destek, M., Sinha, A., 2020. Renewable, non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, trade openness and ecological footprint: Evidence from organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 242, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118537.

Dogan, E., Seker, F., 2016. Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy 94 (August), 429-439.

Dogan, E., Ulucak, R., Kocak, E., Isik, C., 2020. The use of ecological footprint in estimating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Science of The Total Environment 723, 138063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063.

Dumitrescu, E., Hurlin, C., 2012. Testing for Granger Non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Economic Modelling 29 (4), 1450-1460.

Faiz-Ur-Rehman, Ali, A., Nasir, M., 2007. Corruption, trade openness, and environmental quality: a panel data analysis of selected South Asian countries. The Pakistan Development Review 46 (4), 673-688.

FAOSTAT., 2020. FAOSTAT: Compare Data. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#compare. Retrieved June 1, 2020.

Feijoó, M., Franco, J., Hernández, J., 2002. Global warming and the energy efficiency of Spanish industry. Energy Economics 24 (4), 405-423.

Fodha, M., Zaghdoud, O., 2010. Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: An empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 38, 1150-1156.

Ghosh, S., 2010. Examining carbon emissions economic growth nexus for India: a multivariate cointegration approach. Energy Policy 38, 3008-3014.

Harris, R., 2010. Life expectancy and ecological footprint: societal sustainability and health equity. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability 6 (2), 187-199.

Hastik, R., Walzer, C., Haida, C., Garegnani, G., Pezzutto, S., Abegg, B., et al. (2016). Using the “footprint” approach to examine the potentials and impacts of renewable energy sources in the European alps. Mountain Research and Development 36 (2), 130-140.

Hubacek, K., Guan, D., Barrett, J., Wiedmann, T., 2009. Environmental implications of urbanization and lifestyle change in China: ecological and water footprint. Journal of Cleaner Production 17, 1241-1248.

IEA., 2018. Global energy and CO2 emissions status report. International Energy Agency, https://www.iea.org/geco/emissions, Accessed date 16 January 2020.

Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53-74.

Inglesi-Lotz, R., Dogan, E., 2018. The role of renewable versus non-renewable energy to the level of CO2 emissions a panel analysis of sub- Saharan Africa’s Βig 10 electricity generators. Renewable Energy 123, 36-43.

Jebli, M., Youssef, S., Apergis, N., 2019. The dynamic linkage between renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, economic growth, foreign direct investment, and trade. Latin American Economic Review 28 (2), 1-19.

Jones, C., Kammen, D., 2013. Spatial distribution of U.S. household carbon footprints reveals suburbanization undermines greenhouse gas benefits of urban population density. Environmental Science & Technology 48 (2), 895-902.

Kanjilal, K., Ghosh, S., 2013. Environmental Kuznet’s curve for India: evidence from tests for cointegration with unknown structuralbreaks. Energy Policy 56 (c), 509-515.

Koçak, E., Şarkgüneşi, A., 2018. The impact of foreign direct investment on CO2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from cointegration and bootstrap causality analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (1), 790-804.

Kumar, R., Stauvermann, P., 2019. The effects of a revenue-neutral child subsidy tax mechanism on growth and GHG emissions. Sustainability 11 (9), 1-23.

Levin, A., Lin, C., Chu, C., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24.

Liddle, B., 2013. Urban density and climate change: a STIRPAT analysis using city-level data. Journal of Transport Geography 28, 22-29.

Long, X., Naminse, E., Du, J., Zhuang, J., 2015. Nonrenewable energy, renewable energy, carbon dioxide emissions and economic growth in China from 1952 to 2012. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 52, 680-688.

Marquart-Pyatt, S., 2015. Environmental sustainability: the ecological footprint in West Africa. Human Ecology Review 22 (1), 73-92.

O’Neill, B., Chen, B., 2002. Demographic determinants of household energy use in the United States. Population and Development Review 28, 53-88.

O’Neill, B., MacKellar, F., Lutz, W., 2001. Population and climate change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, UK.

OECD., 2018. Economic outlook for Southeast Asia, China and India 2018: fostering growth through digitalisation, OECD Publishing, Paris, http://dx.doi.org/9789264286184-en\.

Ogawa, J., 2008. Revised Kyoto protocol target achievement plan - overview and history of revision. Institute of Energy Economics Japan, 2008 (July), 1-6.

Pebley, A.R., 1998. Demography and the environment. Demography 35 (4), 377-389.

Pesaran, M., 2004. General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 0435, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.

Pesaran, M., 2007. A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Economics 22 (2), 265-312.

Pesaran, M., Shin, Y., Smith, R., 1999. Pooled mean group estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of American Statistic Association 94 (446), 621-634.

Rice, J., 2007. Ecological unequal exchange: international trade and unevenutilization of environmental space in the world system. Social Forces 85, 1369-1392.

Roengjit, S., 2019. Political indifference fuels air-pollution crisis. Bangkok Post, https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/special-reports/1800944/political-indifference-fuels-air-pollution-crisis, Accessed date: 27 December 2019.

Sabir, S., Gorus, M., 2019. The impact of globalization on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from the South Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, 33387–33398.

Sarkodie, S., Strezov, V., 2019. Effect of foreign direct investments, economic development and energy consumption on greenhouse gas emissions in developing countries. Science of the Total Environment 646, 862-871.

Saud, B., Paudel, G., 2018. The threat of ambient air pollution in Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2018, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1504591.

Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A., 2019. Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies 46 (1), 106-168.

Shahbaz, M., Mallick, H., Mahalik, M., Loganathan, N., 2015. Does globalization impede environmental quality in India? Ecological Indicators 52 (May), 379-393.

Shahzad, S., Kumar, R., Zakaria, M., Hurr, M., 2017. Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: a revisit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 70 (April), 185-192.

Sharma, R., Kautish, P., Uddin, M., 2020. Do the international economic endeavors affect CO2 emissions in open economies of South Asia? An empirical examination under nonlinearity. Management of Environmental Quality 31 (1), 89-110.

Sharma, R., Sinha, A., Kautish, P., 2020a. Examining the impacts of economic and demographic aspects on the ecological footprint in South and Southeast Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27 (29), 36970-36982.

Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., Balsalobre, D., 2017. Exploring the relationship between energy usage segregation and environmental degradation in N-11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 168, 1217-1229.

Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M., Sengupta, T., 2018. Renewable energy policies and contradictions in causality: A case of Next 11 countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, 73-84.

Stephenson, J., Newman, K., Mayhew, S., 2010. Population dynamics and climate change: what are the links? Journal of Public Health 32 (2), 150-156.

Streck, C., Keenlyside, P., Unger, M., 2016. The Paris agreement: a new beginning. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 13 (2016), 3-29.

The Economic Times., 2019a. Out of top 10 most polluted cities in the world, 7 cities are from India alone. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/out-of-top-10-most-polluted-cities-in-the-world-7-cities-are-from-india-alone/south-asias-battle/slideshow/68266564.cms., Accessed date: 7 January 2020.

The Economic Times., 2019b. Delhi pollution: check latest updates, rules and more. The Economic Times, https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/delhi-odd-even-scheme-starts-today-from-8-am/articleshow/71884541.cms, Accessed date: 8 January 2020

The Times of India., 2019. Most climate deaths in India. The Times of India, pp. 1.

Todaro, M., Smith, S., 2017. Economic Development (12th ed.), Pearson Education, India.

Tyler, S., Fajber, L., 2009. Land and water resource management in Asia. International Institute for Sustainable Development, Canada. https://www.iisd.org/sites/default/files/publications/asia_background_landwater.pdf.

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2019. Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2019.

United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), 2020. Asia and the Pacific SDG Progress Report 2020.

UNDP., 2019. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Development Programme, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-development-goals.html, Accessed date: 19 December 2019.

Vadrevu, K., Ohara, T., Justice, C., 2017. Land cover, land use changes and air pollution in Asia: a synthesis. Environmental Research Letters 12 (2), 1-17. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aa9c5d.

Wackernagel, M., Rees, W., 1996. Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society Publisher, Gabriola Island, BC.

Westerlund, J., 2007. Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748.

Wu, M., Wei, Y., Lam, P., Liu, F., Li, Y., 2019. Is urban development ecologically sustainable? Ecological footprint analysis and prediction based on a modified artificial neural network model: a case study of Tianjin in China. Journal of Cleaner Production 237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117795.

Yilanci, V., Pata, U., 2020. Convergence of per capita ecological footprint among the ASEAN-5 countries: evidence from a non-linear panel unit root test. Ecological Indicators 113, 106178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106178.

Zafar, M., Mirza, F., Zaidi, S., Hou, F., 2019. The nexus of renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade openness, and CO2 emissions in the framework of EKC: evidence from emerging economies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26 (15), 15162-15173.

Zagheni, E., 2011. The leverage of demographic dynamics on carbon dioxide emissions: does age structure matter? Demography 48 (1), 371-399.

Zaidi, S., Danish, Hou, F., Mirza, F., 2018. The role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in CO2 emissions: a disaggregate analysis of Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25 (31), 31616-31629.

Zhang, S., Liu, X., Bae, J., 2017. Does trade openness affect CO2 emissions: evidence from ten newly industrialized countries? Environmental Science and Pollution Research 24 (21), 17616-17625.

Zhu, H., Duan, L., Guo, Y., Yu, K., 2016. The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Economic Modelling, 58, 237-248.