Cabrera, José María and Caffera, Marcelo and Cid, Alejandro (2020): Modest and Incomplete Incentives May Have Very Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105051.pdf Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
We quantify, for the first time, the impact of different prices on the quantity used of disposable plastic bags over a one-year post-treatment period, with respect to a one-year pre-treatment period of no regulation. Our outcome variable is the number of single-use plastic bags used by customers of a Uruguayan supermarket chain, before and after it implemented a staggered rollout across the country. Using a difference-in-difference identification strategy, we find that prices of US$ 0.07 and US$ 0.10 per bag decreased the quantity demanded in the range of 70% to 85%, relative to a control group of branches that did not price plastic bags. These estimates are robust in magnitude and statistical significance to different methods of estimation, different specifications of the estimated equation and placebo tests. In particular, they are robust to the estimation of strategic anticipatory behavior by customers. In addition, using a pre-post analysis, we estimate that a US$ 0.14 price may have decreased the demand by an additional 40%. Reassuringly, we do not find evidence consistent with the effect of the prices been driven by a loss of sales. Finally, because not all the stores in the treated cities priced the bags, our work informs policy makers about conditions under which incomplete regulation may achieve good results.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modest and Incomplete Incentives May Have Very Large Effects: The Impact of Prices on the Demand for Plastic Bags |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | plastic bags, price, consumer behavior, difference in difference, synthetic controls, anticipation effects |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D04 - Microeconomic Policy: Formulation, Implementation, and Evaluation D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M2 - Business Economics > M21 - Business Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling |
Item ID: | 105051 |
Depositing User: | Alejandro Cid |
Date Deposited: | 05 Jan 2021 22:11 |
Last Modified: | 05 Jan 2021 22:12 |
References: | Abadie, A. (2019). Using Synthetic Controls: Feasibility, Data Requirements, and Methodological Aspects, Journal of Economic Literature, forthcoming. Abadie, A. & Gardeazabal, J. (2003). The economic costs of conflict: A case study of the Basque Country. American Economic Review, 93(1), 113-132. Bharadwaj, B., Baland, J. M., & Nepal, M. (2020). What makes a ban on plastic bags effective? The case of Nepal. Environment and Development Economics, 25(2), 95-114. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2009). The experimental approach to development economics. Annu. Rev. Econ., 1(1), 151-178. Barnes, D. K., Galgani, F., Thompson, R. C., & Barlaz, M. (2009). Accumulation and fragmentation of plastic debris in global environments. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1985-1998. Bowles, S., & Polania-Reyes, S. (2012). Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? Journal of Economic Literature, 50(2), 368-425. Bueno, M., & Valente, M. (2019). The effects of pricing waste generation: A synthetic control approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 96, 274-285. Centro Comercial e Industrial de Salto (2018). Información práctica sobre la Campaña “Somos limpios, somos felices”. Convery, F., McDonnell, S., & Ferreira, S. (2007). The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environmental and Resource Economics, 38(1), 1-11. Diario El Pueblo (2018). “De manera dispar comenzó la aplicación de la campaña que busca disminuir el uso de bolsas de nylon en los comercios. April 3, 2018. Dikgang, J., Leiman, A., & Visser, M. (2012a). Elasticity of demand, price and time: lessons from South Africa's plastic-bag levy. Applied Economics, 44(26), 3339-3342. Dikgang, J., Leiman, A., & Visser, M. (2012b). Analysis of the plastic-bag levy in South Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 59-65. El Observador (2018). Salto empieza a cobrar las bolsas plásticas, el primer departamento en hacerlo. April 6, 2018. El Observador (2019). Arranca el cobro de las bolsas aunque estas no se ajustan a los requisitos de la ley. April 1, 2019. El País (2019). Así explicaron los comerciantes por qué comenzaron a cobrar las bolsas plásticas. April 3, 2019. Fowlie, M. L. (2009). Incomplete environmental regulation, imperfect competition, and emissions leakage. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 1(2), 72-112. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1-17. Goodman-Bacon, A. (2019). Difference-in-Differences with Variation in Treatment Timing. Goodman-Bacon, A., Goldring, T. & Nichols, A. (2019) bacondecomp: Stata module for Decomposing difference-in-differences estimation with variation in treatment timing. Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2020).World Values Survey: Round Seven - Country-Pooled Datafile. Madrid, Spain & Vienna, Austria: JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. doi.org/10.14281/18241.1. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp He, H. (2012). Effects of environmental policy on consumption: lessons from the Chinese plastic bag regulation. Environment and Development Economics, 17, 407-431. Holla, A., & Kremer, M. (2009). Pricing and access: Lessons from randomized evaluations in education and health. Center for Global Development working paper, (158). Homonoff, T. A. (2018). Can Small Incentives Have Large Effects? The Impact of Taxes versus Bonuses on Disposable Bag Use. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 10(4), 177-210. Homonoff, T., Kao, L. S., Selman, J., D., & Seybolt, C. (2020). Skipping the Bag: The Relative Effectiveness of Bans versus Taxes Inglehart, R., C. Haerpfer, A. Moreno, C. Welzel, K. Kizilova, J. Diez-Medrano, M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen et al. (eds.). (2014). World Values Survey: Round Six - Country-Pooled Datafile 2010-2014. Madrid: JD Systems Institute. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSOnline.jsp Intendencia de Salto (2018). Resolución Municipal 074/18 Instituto Nacional de Estadística (2018). Encuesta Continua de Hogares. Jakovcevic, A., Steg, L., Mazzeo, N., Caballero, R., Franco, P., Putrino, N., & Favara, J. (2014). Charges for plastic bags: motivational and behavioral effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 372-380. Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Lönnstedt, O. M., & Eklöv, P. (2016). Environmentally relevant concentrations of microplastic particles influence larval fish ecology. Science, 352(6290), 1213-1216. Kőszegi, B., & Rabin, M. (2006). A model of reference-dependent preferences. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1133-1165. Martinho, G., Balaia, N., & Pires, A. (2017). The Portuguese plastic carrier bag tax: The effects on consumers’ behavior. Waste management, 61, 3-12. Moore, C. J. (2008). Synthetic polymers in the marine environment: a rapidly increasing, long-term threat. Environmental research, 108(2), 131-139. Nielsen, T. D., Holmberg, K., & Stripple, J. (2019). Need a bag? A review of public policies on plastic carrier bags–Where, how and to what effect? Waste management, 87, 428-440. Poortinga, W., Whitmarsh, L., & Suffolk, C. (2013). The introduction of a single-use carrier bag charge in Wales: Attitude change and behavioural spillover effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 36, 240-247. Rivers, N., Shenstone-Harris, S., & Young, N. (2017). Using nudges to reduce waste? The case of Toronto's plastic bag levy. Journal of Environmental Management, 188, 153-162. Shampanier, K., Mazar, N., & Ariely, D. (2007). Zero as a special price: The true value of free products. Marketing Science, 26(6), 742-757. Taylor, R. L. (2019). Bag leakage: The effect of disposable carryout bag regulations on unregulated bags. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 254-271 Taylor, R. L. (2020). A Mixed Bag: The Hidden Time Costs of Regulating Consumer Behavior. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(2), 345-378. Taylor, R. L., & Villas-Boas, S. B. (2016). Bans vs. Fees: Disposable Carryout Bag Policies and Bag Usage. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 38(2), 351-372. Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(4), 1039-1061. UNEP (2014). Valuing Plastics: The Business Case for Measuring, Managing and Disclosing Plastic Use in the Consumer Goods Industry. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/9238 UNEP (2018). Legal Limits on Single-use Plastics and Microplastics: A Global Review of National Laws and Regulations http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/27113 Weitzman, M. L. (1974). Prices vs. quantities. The review of economic studies, 41(4), 477-491. U.S. Census Bureau (2019). Selected Economic Characteristics, 2010-2019 American Community Survey. Retrieved from https://data.census.gov/cedsci/table?g=0500000US24031&tid=ACSDP5Y2011.DP03 Xanthos, D., & Walker, T. R. (2017). International policies to reduce plastic marine pollution from single-use plastics (plastic bags and microbeads): A review. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 118, 17–26. XLVIIIa Legislatura (2017). Uso Sustentable de Bolsas Plásticas. Repartido N° 876. Comisión de Vivienda, Territorio y Medio Ambiente, Cámara de Representantes. Diciembre. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105051 |