Ohnishi, Kazuhiro (2020): Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: substitutive, independent and complementary goods.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105654.pdf Download (155kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This study examines a price-setting mixed duopoly with production subsidies and demonstrates that under the optimal production subsidy of each of substitutive, independent and complementary goods, profits and economic welfare are respectively identical in the three regimes of (i) a public firm and a private firm simultaneously set prices, (ii) the public firm acts as a leader, and (iii) both firms act simultaneously as profit-maximizers.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: substitutive, independent and complementary goods |
English Title: | Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: substitutive, independent and complementary goods |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Mixed duopoly model; Price competition; Subsidization; Substitutive goods; Independent goods; Complementary goods |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L32 - Public Enterprises ; Public-Private Enterprises |
Item ID: | 105654 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Kazuhiro Ohnishi |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jan 2021 08:41 |
Last Modified: | 30 Jan 2021 08:41 |
References: | Barcena-Ruiz, J. C., Garzón, M. B., 2007. Capacity choice in a mixed duopoly under price competition. Economics Bulletin 12 (26), 1-7. Bárcena-Ruiz, J. C., Sedano, M., 2011. Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly: weighed welfare and price competition. Japanese Economic Review 62 (4), 485-503. Fjell, K., Heywood, J. S., 2004. Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firm’s moves: the relevance of privatization. Economics Letters 83 (3), 411-416. Hashimzade, N., Khodavaisi, H., Myles, G., 2007. An irrelevance result with differentiated goods. Economics Bulletin 8 (2), 1-7. Myles, G., 2002. Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: an irrelevance result for the general case. Economics Bulletin 12 (1), 1-6. Ohnishi, K., 2010. Domestic and international mixed models with price competition. International Review of Economics 57 (1), 1-7. Ohnishi, K., 2012. Price-setting mixed duopoly, privatization and subsidization. Microeconomics and Macroeconomics 1 (1), 20-23. Ohnishi, K., 2020. Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: the relevance of privatization. Economics Bulletin 40 (4), 3071-3076. Poyago-Theotoky, J., 2001. Mixed oligopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: an irrelevance result. Economics Bulletin 12 (3), 1-5. Scrimitore, M., 2014. Quantity competition vs. price competition under optimal subsidy in a mixed oligopoly. Economic Modelling 42 (C), 166-176. White, M. D., 1996. Mixed oligopoly, privatization and subsidization. Economics Letters 53 (2), 189-195. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105654 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms’ moves: an irrelevance result. (deposited 26 Aug 2020 11:06)
- Price-setting mixed duopoly, subsidization and the order of firms' moves: substitutive, independent and complementary goods. (deposited 30 Jan 2021 08:41) [Currently Displayed]