Vulpe, Simona - Nicoleta and Rughinis, Cosima (2021): Social amplification of risk and “probable vaccine damage”:A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries. Published in: Vaccine (February 2021)
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105949.pdf Download (409kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Background: Despite lacking scientific support, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. While serious vaccine damage as a scientific fact is real yet statistically highly uncommon, emerging social and technological forces have amplified perceptions of risk for “probable vaccine damage”, making it a widely shared intersubjective reality. Methods: Using the Eurobarometer 91.2 survey on a statistically representative EU27-UK sample interviewed in March 2019, we documented perceptions of vaccine risks and identified three belief configurations regarding vaccine effectiveness, safety, and usefulness, through exploratory cluster analysis. Results: The public beliefs in significant vaccine risks are frequent. Approximatively one-tenth of the EU27-UK population consider that vaccines are not rigorously tested before authorization, one-third believe that vaccines can overload or weaken the immune system and that they can cause the disease against which they protect, and almost one-half believe that vaccines can cause serious side effects. We identified three belief configurations: hesitant, confident, and trade-off clusters. The hesitant type (approx. 11% of EU27-UK respondents) is defined by the perception that vaccines are rather ineffective, affected by risks of probable vaccine damage, not well-tested, and useless; the confident type (approx. 59%) is defined by beliefs that vaccines are effective, safe, well-tested, and useful; and the trade-off type (approx. 29%) combines beliefs that vaccines are effective, well-tested and useful, with perceptions of probable vaccine damage. The vaccine-confident and the trade-off types have similar vaccination histories, indicating the significant role of other factors besides beliefs in inducing behavior. Conclusions: The high proportion of varying public beliefs in significant vaccine risks and the presence of a trade-off type of vaccination assessment indicate the social normality of beliefs in probable vaccine damage. Communication campaigns should take into account the social normality of the perceived risk of “probable vaccine damage” across various social types, and patterns of concomitant trust and mistrust in vaccination.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Social amplification of risk and “probable vaccine damage”:A typology of vaccination beliefs in 28 European countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Vaccine hesitancy; vaccine damage; typology; Eurobarometer; belief configurations |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I1 - Health > I12 - Health Behavior |
Item ID: | 105949 |
Depositing User: | Miss Simona Vulpe |
Date Deposited: | 10 Feb 2021 05:29 |
Last Modified: | 11 Feb 2021 16:47 |
References: | [1] J. V. Lazarus et al., “A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine,” Nat. Med., 2020. [2] S. Riedel, “Edward Jenner and the History of Smallpox and Vaccination,” Baylor Univ. Med. Cent. Proc., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 21–25, Jan. 2005. [3] E. Dubé, M. Vivion, and N. E. MacDonald, “Vaccine hesitancy, vaccine refusal and the anti-vaccine movement: Influence, impact and implications,” Expert Rev. Vaccines, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 99–117, 2014. [4] P. Hobson-West, “Understanding vaccination resistance: moving beyond risk,” Health. Risk Soc., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 273–283, 2003. [5] E. J. Sobo, A. Huhn, A. Sannwald, and L. Thurman, “Information Curation among Vaccine Cautious Parents: Web 2.0, Pinterest Thinking, and Pediatric Vaccination Choice,” Med. Anthropol. Cross Cult. Stud. Heal. Illn., vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 529–546, Nov. 2016. [6] S. Blume, “Anti-vaccination movements and their interpretations,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 628–642, 2006. [7] E. Dubé, C. Laberge, M. Guay, P. Bramadat, R. Roy, and J. Bettinger, “Vaccine hesitancy An overview,” Hum. Vaccin. Immunother., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1763–1773, 2013. [8] C. Betsch, F. Renkewitz, T. Betsch, and C. Ulshöfer, “The influence of vaccine-critical websites on perceiving vaccination risks.,” J. Health Psychol., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 446–55, Apr. 2010. [9] R. Z. Zimmerman et al., “Vaccine Criticism on the World Wide Web,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 7, no. 2, p. e17, 2005. [10] J. P. Baker, “Mercury, Vaccines, and Autism One Controversy, Three Histories,” Am. J. Public Health, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 244–253, 2008. [11] J. K. Ward, J. Colgrove, and P. Verger, “Why France is making eight new vaccines mandatory,” Vaccine, vol. 36, no. 14, pp. 1801–1803, 2018. [12] World Health Organization, “Report on the Sage Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy,” 2014. [13] J. Bines, “Intussusception and rotavirus vaccines,” Vaccine, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 3772–3776, May 2006. [14] S. S. Ahmed, P. H. Schur, N. E. MacDonald, and L. Steinman, “Narcolepsy, 2009 A(H1N1) pandemic influenza, and pandemic influenza vaccinations: What is known and unknown about the neurological disorder, the role for autoimmunity, and vaccine adjuvants,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 50. Academic Press, pp. 1–11, May-2014. [15] F. Aquino, G. Donzelli, E. De Franco, G. Privitera, and P. L. Lopalco, “The web and public confidence in MMR vaccination in Italy,” Vaccine, vol. 35, no. 35, pp. 4494–4498, 2017. [16] M. Bigham and R. Copes, “Thiomersal in vaccines: Balancing the risk of adverse effects with the risk of vaccine-preventable disease,” Drug Safety, vol. 28, no. 2. Springer, pp. 89–101, Nov-2005. [17] Ş. Matei, “Responsibility beyond the grave: Technological mediation of collective moral agency in online commemorative environments,” Des. Issues, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 84–94, Jan. 2018. [18] C. Toth, “The rational, loving and responsible parent. A discursive construction of the identities of the parents that decided not to vaccinate their children,” J. Comp. Res. Anthropol. Sociol., vol. 10, no. 2, 2019. [19] C. Toth, “‘To Vaccinate or not to Vaccinate my Child?’ What Is at Stake in Vaccination Repertoires?,” Educ. J. Res. Debate, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 1–6, 2020. [20] J. A. Reich, “Neoliberal Mothering and Vaccine Refusal,” Gend. Soc., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 679–704, Oct. 2014. [21] R. Gasparini, D. Panatto, P. L. Lai, and D. Amicizia, “The ‘urban myth’ of the association between neurological disorders and vaccinations,” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Hygiene, vol. 56, no. 1. Pacini Editore S.p.A., pp. E1–E8, 2015. [22] C. M. Poland and G. A. Poland, “Vaccine education spectrum disorder: the importance of incorporating psychological and cognitive models into vaccine education,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 37, pp. 6145–6148, 2011. [23] D. Numerato, L. Vochocová, V. Štětka, and A. Macková, “The vaccination debate in the ‘post‐truth’ era: social media as sites of multi‐layered reflexivity,” Sociol. Health Illn., vol. 41, no. S1, pp. 82–97, Oct. 2019. [24] S. Quinn, A. Jamison, D. Musa, K. Hilyard, and V. Freimuth, “Exploring the Continuum of Vaccine Hesitancy Between African American and White Adults: Results of a Qualitative Study,” PLOS Curr., vol. 8, 2016. [25] S. Ramanadhan, E. Galarce, Z. Xuan, J. Alexander-Molloy, and K. Viswanath, “Addressing the Vaccine Hesitancy Continuum: An Audience Segmentation Analysis of American Adults Who Did Not Receive the 2009 H1N1 Vaccine,” Vaccines, vol. 3, pp. 556–578, 2015. [26] N. E. MacDonald, “Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants,” Vaccine, vol. 14, no. 33, pp. 1–4, 2015. [27] C. Doty, “Misinformation on the Internet?: A Study of Vaccine Safety Beliefs,” UCLA, 2015. [28] C. Doty, “Social Epistemology and Cognitive Authority in Online Comments about Vaccine Safety,” in iConference 2015 Proceedings, 2015. [29] E. Gardella and J. Souloumiac, “Entretien avec Robert Castel Propos recueillis par Edouard Gardella et Julien Souloumiac,” Tracés. Rev. Sci. Hum., vol. 6, pp. 103–112, 2004. [30] N. Smith and T. Graham, “Mapping the anti-vaccination movement on Facebook,” Inf. Commun. Soc., vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1310–1327, Jul. 2019. [31] R. E. Kasperson et al., “The Social Amplification of Risk A Conceptual Framework,” Risk Anal., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 177–187, 1988. [32] M. E. Díaz Crescitelli et al., “A meta-synthesis study of the key elements involved in childhood vaccine hesitancy,” Public Health, vol. 180, pp. 38–45, 2020. [33] C. Gidengil, C. Chen, A. M. Parker, S. Nowak, and L. Matthews, “Beliefs around childhood vaccines in the United States: A systematic review,” Vaccine, vol. 37, no. 45. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 6793–6802, Oct-2019. [34] R. Casiday, “Risk and trust in vaccine decision making,” Durham Anthropol. J., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005. [35] C. Toth, “Repertoires of Vaccine Refusal in Romania,” Vaccines, vol. 8, no. 757, pp. 1–16, 2020. [36] H. J. Larson et al., “The State of Vaccine Confidence 2016: Global Insights Through a 67-Country Survey,” EBioMedicine, vol. 12, pp. 295–301, 2016. [37] A. Kennedy, K. LaVail, G. Nowak, M. Basket, and S. Landry, “Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions,” Health Aff., vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1151–1159, Jun. 2011. [38] P. Stefanoff et al., “Tracking parental attitudes on vaccination across European countries: The Vaccine Safety, Attitudes, Training and Communication Project (VACSATC),” Vaccine, vol. 28, pp. 5731–5737, 2010. [39] A. Zingg and M. Siegrist, “Measuring people’s knowledge about vaccination: Developing a one-dimensional scale,” Vaccine, vol. 30, no. 25, pp. 3771–3777, May 2012. [40] M. Y. K. Chow, M. Dankin, H. W. Willaby, S. Pemberton, and J. Leask, “Parental attitudes, beliefs, behaviours and concerns towards childhood vaccinations in Australia: A national online survey,” Aust. Fam. Physician, vol. 46, no. 3, 2017. [41] F. Napolitano, A. D’Alessandro, and I. F. Angelillo, “Investigating Italian parents’ vaccine hesitancy: A cross-sectional survey,” Hum. Vaccin. Immunother., vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1558–1565, Jul. 2018. [42] A. Hadjipanayis et al., “Vaccine confidence among parents: Large scale study in eighteen European countries,” Vaccine, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1505–1512, Feb. 2020. [43] M. J. Hornsey, E. A. Harris, and K. S. Fielding, “The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: A 24-Nation Investigation,” Heal. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 307–315, 2018. [44] M. T. Keane et al., “Confidence in vaccination: a parent model,” Vaccine, vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 2486–2493, 2005. [45] N. A. Constantine and P. Jerman, “Acceptance of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination among Californian Parents of Daughters: A Representative Statewide Analysis,” J. Adolesc. Heal., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 108–115, 2007. [46] I. Rossen, M. J. Hurlstone, P. D. Dunlop, and C. Lawrence, “‘Accepters’, ‘fence sitters’, and ‘rejecters’,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 224, pp. 23–27, 2019. [47] J. Kennedy, “Populist politics and vaccine hesitancy in Western Europe: An analysis of national-level data,” Eur. J. Public Health, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 512–516, 2019. [48] E. Pavolini, E. Kuhlmann, T. I. Agartan, R. Mannion, and E. Speed, “Healthcare governance, professions and populism: is there a relationship? An explorative comparison of five European countries,” Health Policy (New. York)., vol. 122, no. 10, pp. 1140–1148, 2018. [49] J. Luyten, L. Bruyneel, and A. J. van Hoek, “Assessing vaccine hesitancy in the UK population using a generalized vaccine hesitancy survey instrument,” Vaccine, vol. 37, pp. 2494–2501, 2019. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105949 |