Szekeres, Szabolcs (2021): Should CBA use descriptive or prescriptive discount rates? It should use both!
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106029.pdf Download (394kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Discounting project net flows that exclude financing costs with prescriptive rates fails to reflect costs of capital; discounting them with descriptive rates fails to reflect intertemporal preferences. A hybrid discounting method is proposed whereby descriptive rates are used to forecast costs of capital and prescriptive rates are used to discount all-inclusive net welfare flows. An agent-based capital market model audits the performance of alternative discounting approaches. There is no need to reconcile the discounting approaches. They should be viewed as complementary, not as competing. They are both necessary, and only jointly sufficient to achieve optimality in intertemporal resource allocation.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Should CBA use descriptive or prescriptive discount rates? It should use both! |
English Title: | Should CBA use descriptive or prescriptive discount rates? It should use both! |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Social discount rate; Prescriptive discounting; Descriptive discounting; Hybrid discounting; Declining discount rates. |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis H - Public Economics > H4 - Publicly Provided Goods > H43 - Project Evaluation ; Social Discount Rate |
Item ID: | 106029 |
Depositing User: | Mr Szabolcs Szekeres |
Date Deposited: | 12 Feb 2021 06:51 |
Last Modified: | 12 Feb 2021 06:51 |
References: | Baumol, William J. 1968. “On the Social Rate of Discount”, American Economic Review, Volume 58, No. 4 (September 1968), https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815533 Becker, Gary, Kevin Murphy and Robert Topel. (2011). “On the Economics of Climate Policy.” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 10. 19-19. 10.2202/1935-1682.2854. https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.2854 Chichilnisky, Graciela. (1997). “What is Sustainable Development?” Land Economics 73, 467–491. http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdfplus/3147240 Freeman, Mark C. and Ben Groom, “Gamma Discounting and the Combination of Forecasts” (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1676793 Gandelman, Néstor and Rubén Hernáandez-Murillo (2014). “Risk Aversion at the Country Level,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, http://research.stlouisfed.org/wp/2014/2014-005.pdf “Green Book:” HMT (2020). Guidelines on Cost-benefit Analysis. HM Treasury, UK, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938046/The_Green_Book_2020.pdf Groom, Ben, Cameron Hepburn, Phoebe Koundouri, and David Pearce (2005). “Declining Discount Rates: The Long and the Short of it.” Environ Resource Economics 32, 445–493 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-005-4681-y Marglin, Stephen A. (1963) “The Opportunity Costs of Public Investment.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics, May, 1963, Vol. 77, No. 2 (May, 1963), pp. 274-289 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1884403 Nordhaus, William (2019). “Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics.” American Economic Review, 2019, 109(6): 1991–2014, https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.109.6.1991 Pigou, Arthur C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare, 4th edition. Macmillan, London Rubinstein, Mark, (1976), “The Strong Case for the Generalized Logarithmic Utility Model as the Premier Model of Financial Markets,” Journal of Finance, 31, issue 2, p. 551-71, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1976.tb01906.x Szekeres, Szabolcs (2020). “Checking the Evidence for Declining Discount Rates,” MPRA Paper No. 102233, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/102233/ Weitzman, Martin L. (1998). “Why the Far Distant Future Should Be Discounted at its Lowest Possible Rate”, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 36, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1052 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106029 |