Marini, Marco A. and Tarola, Ornella and Thisse, Jacques-Francois (2021): Is Environmentalism the Right Strategy to Decarbonize the World?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106340.pdf Download (304kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study how the supply of environmentalism, which is defined by psychic benefits (costs) associated with the purchase of high-environmental (low-environmental) qualities, affects the way firms choose their prices and products and the ensuing consequences for the global level of pollution. Contrary to general belief, a high supply of environmentalism does not necessarily give rise to a better environmental outcome because it endows the green firms with more market power which they use to charge higher prices. Nonetheless, environmentalism can be used to effectively complement more traditional policy instruments such as a minimum environmental standard.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Is Environmentalism the Right Strategy to Decarbonize the World? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | environmentalism, psychic costs and benefits, vertical product differentiation, environmental policy |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D0 - General L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L23 - Organization of Production Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs ; Distributional Effects ; Employment Effects Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth |
Item ID: | 106340 |
Depositing User: | Prof Marco Marini |
Date Deposited: | 08 Mar 2021 07:42 |
Last Modified: | 08 Mar 2021 07:42 |
References: | Allcott, H. (2011) Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics 95: 1082-95 Amacher, G.S., E. Koskelac and M. Ollikainend (2004) Environmental quality competition and eco-labeling. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 47: 284-306. Ambec, S. and Ph. De Donder (2020) Environmental policy with green consumerism. CESifo Working Paper No. 8457. Anderson, S.P., A. de Palma and J.-F. Thisse (1992) Discrete Choice Theory of Product Differentiation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Arora, S. and S. Gangopadhyay (1995) Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 28: 289-309. Bansal, S. (2008) Choice and design of regulatory instruments in the presence of green consumers. Resource and Energy Economics 30: 345-68. Bansal, S. and S. Gangopadhyay (2003) Tax/subsidy policies in the presence of environmentally aware consumers. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45: 333-55. Belleflamme, P. and M. Peitz (2015) Industrial Organization: Markets and Strategies (2nd Edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brécard, D. (2013) Environmental quality competition and taxation in the presence of green network effect among consumers. Environmental & Resource Economics 54: 1-19. Carlsson, F., J.H. García and Å. Löfgren (2010) Conformity and the demand for environmental goods. Environmental & Resource Economics 47: 407-21. Cremer, H. and J.-F. Thisse (1999) On the taxation of polluting products in a differentiated industry. European Economic Review 43: 575-94. Doni, N. and G. Ricciuti (2013) Market equilibrium in the presence of green consumers and responsible firms: A comparative statics analysis. Resource and Energy Economics 35: 380-95. Elhadj, N.B. and O. Tarola (2015) Relative quality (dis)utility in a vertically differentiated oligopoly with an environmental externality. Environment and Development Economics: 349-73. Eriksson, C. (2004) Can green consumerism replace environmental regulation?---A differentiated-products example. Resource and Energy Economics 26: 281-93. Gabszewicz, J.J. and O. Tarola (2018) Oligopoly and product differentiation. In L.C. Corchon and M.A. Marini (eds). Handbook of Game Theory and Industrial Organization. Volume 1. pp.137-80. Gabszewicz, J.J. and J.-F. Thisse (1979) Price competition, quality, and income disparities. Journal of Economic Theory 20: 340-359. García-Gallego, A. and N. Georgantzís (2009) Market effects of changes in consumers' social responsibility. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 18: 235--62. Garella, P.G. and L. Lambertini (2014) Bidimensional vertical differentiation. International Journal of Industrial Organization 32: 1-10. Glaeser, E. (2014) The supply of environmentalism: Psychological interventions and economics. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 8: 208-29. Greening, L. A., Greene, D. L., and Difiglio, C. (2000). Energy efficiency and consumption---the rebound effect---a survey. Energy policy 28(6-7), 389-401. Grossman GM, Krueger AB (1993) Environmental impacts of a North America free trade agreement. In: Garber PM (ed) The U.S.---Mexico free trade agreement. MIT Press, Cambridge, 13--56. Harsanyi, J.C. and R. Selten (1988) A General Theory of Equilibrium Selection in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Heffner, R.R., K.S. Kurani and T.S. Turrentine (2007) Symbolism in California' s early market for hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research. Part D 12: 396-413. Kahn, M.E. (2007) Do greens drive Hummers or hybrids? Environmental ideology as a determinant of consumer choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 54: 129-45. Karakosta, O. (2018) Tax competition in vertically differentiated markets with environmentally conscious consumers. Environmental & Resource Economics 69: 693-711. Lambertini, L. (2017) Green innovation and market power. Annual Review of Resource Economics 9: 231-52. Lauga, D.O. and E. Ofek (2011) Product positioning in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model: The role of quality costs. Marketing Science 30: 903-23. Lombardini-Riipinen, C. (2005) Optimal tax policy under environmental quality competition. Environmental & Resource Economics 32: 317-36. Mantovani, A., O. Tarola and C. Vergari (2016) Hedonic and environmental quality: A hybrid model of product differentiation. Resource and Energy Economics 45: 99-123. Maxwell, D., P. Owen, L. McAndrew, K. Muehmel, and A. Neubauer (2011) Addressing the Rebound Effect. A report for the European Commission DG Environment. Millner, A. and H. Ollivier (2016) Beliefs, politics, and environmental policy. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 10: 226-44. Moorthy, K.S. (1993) Competitive market strategies: Game-theoretic models. In J. Eliashberg and G.L. LIlien (eds). Handbook in Operations Research and Management Science. pp.143-90. Moraga-Gonzalez, J.L. and N. Padron-Fumero (2002) Environmental policy in a green market. Environmental & Resource Economics 22: 419-47. Motta, M. (1993) Endogenous quality choice: Price vs. quantity competition. Journal of Industrial Economics 41: 113-31. Murray, C.K. (2013) What if consumers decided to all `go green'? Environmental rebound effects from consumption decisions. Energy Policy 54: 240-56. Neven, D. and J.-F. Thisse (1990) On quality and variety competition. In: J.J. Gabszewicz,J.J., J.-F. Richard and L. Wolsey, eds., Economic Decision Making: Games, Econometrics and Optimization. Contributions in Honour of Jacques Drèze, pp.175-99. Pinto, D.C., M.M. Herter, P. Rossi, and A. Borges (2014) Going green for self or for others? Gender and identity salience effects on sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies 38: 540-49. Rodriguez-Ibeas, R. (2007) Environmental product differentiation and environmental awareness. Environmental & Resource Economics 36: 237-54. Ronnen, R. (1991) Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition. RAND Journal of Economics 22: 490-504. Sexton, S.E. and A. Sexton (2014) Conspicuous conservation: The Prius halo and willingness to pay for environmental bona fides. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 67: 303-17. Shaded, A. and J. Sutton (1983) Natural oligopolies. Econometrica 51: 1469-83. Sorrell, S., (2009). Jevon's Paradox Revisited: the evidence for backfire from improvedefficiency. Energy Policy 37, 1456--1469. Sorrell, S., Dimitropoulos, J., and Sommerville, M. (2009). Empirical estimates of the direct rebound effect: A review. Energy Policy, 37(4), 1356-1371. Stigler, G.J. and G.S. Becker (1977) De gustibus non est disputandum. American Economic Review 67: 76-90. Vivanco, D. F., Kemp, R., and van der Voet, E. (2016). How to deal with the rebound effect? A policy-oriented approach. Energy Policy 94, 114-125. Tirole, J. (1988) Theory of industrial Organization. MIT Press. Vandenbosch, M.B. and C.B. Weinberg (1995) Product and price competition in a two-dimensional vertical differentiation model. Marketing Science 14: 224-49. Wauthy, X. (1996) Quality choice in models of vertical differentiation. Journal of Industrial Economics: 44: 345-353. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106340 |