Polemis, Michael and Fotis, Panagiotis and Tzeremes, Panagiotis and Tzeremes, Nickolaos (2021): On the examination of the decoupling effect of air pollutants from economic growth: A convergence analysis for the US.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106412.pdf Download (942kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The objective of this study is to examine the convergence patterns of decoupling factors of three environmental hazards (CO2, SO2, and NOX) from economic growth across the U.S. regions over the period 1990-2017. By applying the Phillips and Sul (2007, 2009) methodology, we unravel convergence clubs and illustrate their transition paths. The generic algorithm rejects the convergence hypothesis for the whole sample, justifying the existence of several formulated convergence clubs among the US regions. The empirical findings further elucidate the existence of two “large” spatial clusters concerning the CO2 and SO2 decoupling indicators (Club 2 and Club 1 respectively). Lastly, the transition paths validate the P-S convergence test results, while we provide some useful policy implications.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | On the examination of the decoupling effect of air pollutants from economic growth: A convergence analysis for the US |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Decoupling; Ecological footprint; Convergence analysis; Air pollutants; Economic growth. |
Subjects: | O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O44 - Environment and Growth O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O51 - U.S. ; Canada R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes |
Item ID: | 106412 |
Depositing User: | Dr Michael Polemis |
Date Deposited: | 05 Mar 2021 03:56 |
Last Modified: | 05 Mar 2021 03:56 |
References: | Andreoni, V., Galmarini, S. (2012). Decoupling economic growth from carbon dioxide emissions: a decomposition analysis of Italian energy consumption, Energy 44(1), 682-691. Apergis, N., Christou, C., and Miller, S. (2012). Convergence patterns in financial development: evidence from club convergence, Empirical Economics, vol. 43(3): 1011-1040. Brinkley, C. (2014). Decoupled: successful planning policies in countries that have reduced per capita greenhouse gas emissions with continued economic growth. Environmental and Planning C, 32(6), 1083–1099. Camarero, M., Castillo, J., Picazo-Tadeo, A., and Tamarit, C. (2014). Is eco-efficiency in greenhouse gas emissions converging among European Union countries?, Empirical Economics, 47(1): 143-168. Clemente, J., Lazaro-Alquezar, A., Montanes, A., (2019). US state health expenditure convergence: a revisited analysis. Economic Modelling. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.econmod.2019.02.011. Climent, F., Pardo, A. (2007). Decoupling factors on the energy–output linkage: the Spanish case. Energy Policy, 35, 522–528. Mazzantia, M., Zoboli, R. (2008). Waste generation, waste disposal and policy effectiveness: evidence on decoupling from the European Union. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52, 1221–1234. Conrad, E., Cassar, L. (2014). Decoupling economic growth and environmental degradation: reviewing progress to date in the Small Island State of Malta, Sustainability, 6, 6729–6750. De Freitas, L. C., Kaneko, S. (2011). Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions and economic growth in Brazil. Ecological Economics, 70(8), 1459-1469. Diakoulaki, D., Mandaraka, M. (2007). Decomposition analysis for assessing the progress in decoupling industrial growth from CO2 emissions in the EU manufacturing sector. Energy Economics 29, 636–664. Eleftheriou, K., Polemis, M. (2020). One list to fit them all: What do we learn from journal ranking?, Finance Research Letters, vol. 35(C) Finel, N., Tapio, P. (2012). Decoupling Transport CO2 from GDP, Finland Futures Research Centre, FFRC, 1/2012. Grand, M.C. (2016). Carbon emission targets and decoupling indicators, Ecological Indicators, 67, 649-656. Kemp-Benedict, E. (2018). Dematerialization, Decoupling, and Productivity Change, Ecological Economics, 150: 204-216. Knight, K.W., Schor, J. B. (2014). Economic growth and climate change: a cross-national analysis of territorial and consumption-based carbon emissions in high-income countries, Sustainability, 6, 3722–3731. Kojima, M., Bacon, R. (2009). Changes in CO2 emissions from energy use: a multi-country decomposition analysis. World Bank, Extractive Industries for Development Series 11. World Bank, Washington. Mikayilov, I.J., Hasanov, J.F., Galeotti, M. (2018). Decoupling of CO2 emissions and GDP: A time-varying cointegration approach, Ecological Indicators, 95, 615-628. Moutinho, V., Fuinhas, J. A., Marques, A. C., Santiago, R. (2018). Assessing eco-efficiency through the DEA analysis and decoupling index in the Latin American countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 205, 512-524. Muangthai, I., Lewis, C., Lin, S.J. (2014). Decoupling effects and decomposition analysis of CO2 emissions from Thailand's thermal power sector, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 14, 1929–1938. Naqvi, A., Zwickl, K. (2017). Fifty shades of green: Revisiting decoupling by economic sectors and air pollutants, Ecological Economics, 133, 111-126. OECD, (2002). Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. OECD Report. OECD, Paris. Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771-1855. Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2009). Economic transition and growth. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(7), 1153-1185. Raupach, M.R., Marland, G., Ciais, P., Le Quéré, C., Canadell, J.G., Klepper, G., Field, C.B. (2007). Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 104(24), 10288–10293. Roinioti, A., Koroneos, C. (2017). The decomposition of CO2 emissions from energy use in Greece before and during the economic crisis and their decoupling from economic growth, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 76, 448-459. Saha, D., and Jaeger, J. (2020). America’s New Climate Economy: A Comprehensive Guide to the Economic Benefits of Climate Policy in the United States. Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute. Available online at www.wri.org/publication/us-new-climate-economy Sjöström, M., Östblom, G. (2010). Decoupling waste generation from economic growth — a CGE analysis of the Swedish case. Ecological Economics, 69, 1545–1552. Sorrell, S., Lehtonen, M., Stapleton, L., Pujol, J., Champion, T. (2012). Decoupling of road freight energy use from economic growth in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy, 41, 84-97. Tang, Z., Sang, J., Shi, C., Liu, Z., Bi, K. (2014). Decoupling indicators of CO2 emissions from the tourism industry in China: 1990–2012, Ecological Indicators, 46, 390-397. Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137-151. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), (2011). Decoupling Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impacts from Economic Growth. Retrieved from. http://wedocs.unep.org/handle/20.500.11822/9816. Vehmas, J., Kaivo-oja, J., Luukkanen, J. (2003). Global trends of linking environmental stress and economic growth: total primary energy supply and CO2 emissions in the European Union, Japan, USA, China, India, and Brazil. Tutu Publications 7/2003. Turku School of Economics and Business Administration. Vergara, W., Rios, A.R., Paliza, L.M.G., Gutman, P., Isbell, P., Suding, P.H., Samaniego, J. (2013). The Climate and Development Challenge for Latin America and the Caribbean: Options for Climate-resilient, Low-carbon Development, IDB Publications, Inter-American Development Bank number 456. Vlontzos, G., Niavis, S., Manos, B. (2014). A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 40, 91-96. Wang, Q., Zhang, F. (2021). The effects of trade openness on decoupling carbon emissions from economic growth e Evidence from 182 countries, Journal of Cleaner Production, 279(10), 123838. Wang, W., Kuang, Y., Huang, N., Zhao, D. (2014). Empirical research on decoupling relationship between energy-related carbon emission and economic growth in Guangdong Province based on extended Kaya identity, Scientific World Journal, 24, 1-11. Wu, F., Zhou, P., Zhou, D.Q. (2016). Does there exist energy congestion? Empirical evidence from Chinese industrial sectors, Energy Efficiency, 9, 371–384 (2016). Xu, S.-C., Zhang, W.-W., He, Z.-X., Han, H., Long, R.-Y., Chen, H. (2017). Decomposition analysis of the decoupling indicator of carbon emissions due to fossil energy consumption from economic growth in China, Energy Efficiency, 10(6), 1365-1380. Yang, L., & Yang, Y. (2019). Evaluation of eco-efficiency in China from 1978 to 2016: Based on a modified ecological footprint model. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 581-590. Yang, L., Yang, Y., Zhang, X., & Tang, K. (2018). Whether China's industrial sectors make efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from production? -A decomposed decoupling analysis. Energy, 160, 796-809. Zhang, Y.J., Da, Y. Bin. (2015). The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 1255-1266. Zhang, Z. (2000). Decoupling China's carbon emissions increase from economic growth: an economic analysis and policy implications. World Development, 28(4), 739–752. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106412 |