Measuring Freedom in Games

Rommeswinkel, Hendrik (2011): Measuring Freedom in Games.

Abstract

Behind the veil of ignorance, a policy maker ranks combinations of game forms and information about how players interact within the game forms. The paper presents axioms on the preferences of the policy maker that are necessary and sufficient for the policy maker's preferences to be represented by the sum of an expected valuation and a freedom measure. The freedom measure is the mutual information between players' strategies and the players' outcomes of the game, capturing the degree to which players control their outcomes. The measure extends several measures from the opportunity set based freedom literature to situations where agents interact. This allows freedom to be measured in general economic models and thus derive policy recommendations based on the freedom instead of the welfare of agents. To illustrate the measure and axioms, applications to civil liberties and optimal taxation are provided.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Freedom of Choice, Mutual Information, Entropy, Measurement, Game Form, Process, Income Taxation, Civil Liberties
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty

References

Aczel, J., & Dhombres, J. (1989). Functional Equations in Several Variables. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Ahlert, M. (2008). Guarantees in Game Forms. In M. Braham & F. Steffen (Eds.), Power, Freedom, and Voting (pp. 325–341). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Ahlert, M. (2010). A new approach to procedural freedom in game forms. European Journal of Political Economy, 26(3), 392–402.

Arlegi, R., & Dimitrov, D. (2009). On Procedural Freedom of Choice. Homo Oeconomicus, 26(2), 215–234.

Barbera, S., Hammond, P. J., & Seidl, C. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of Utility Theory. Boston, MA, Springer US.

Baujard, A. (2007). Conceptions of freedom and ranking opportunity sets: A typology. Homo Oeconomicus, 24(2), 231–254.

Bavetta, S. (2004). Measuring freedom of choice: An alternative view of a recent literature. Social Choice and Welfare, 22, 29–48.

Bavetta, S., & del Seta, M. (2001). Constraints and the measurement of freedom of choice. Theory and Decision, 50, 213–238.

Bavetta, S., & Peragine, V. (2006). Measuring autonomy freedom. Social Choice and Welfare, 26, 31–45. Berlin, I. (1958). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.

Bervoets, S. (2007). Freedom of choice in a social context: Comparing game forms. Social Choice and Welfare, 29(2), 295–315.

Bossert, W. (1998). Opportunity Sets and the Measurement of Information.

Braham, M. (2006). Measuring Specific Freedom. Economics and Philosophy, 22(3), 317–333.

Burns, S. (2012). Daybreak of Freedom: The Montgomery Bus Boycott. Univ of North Carolina Press.

Carter, I. (1992). The Measurement of Pure Negative Freedom. Political Studies, 40, 38–50.

Carter, I. (1995). Interpersonal Comparisons of Freedom. Economics and Philosophy, 11(1), 1–23.

Carter, I. (2004). Choice, freedom, and freedom of choice. Social Choice and Welfare, 22(1), 61–81.

Carter, I. (2013). Social Power and Negative Freedom. In M. J. Holler & H. Nurmi (Eds.), Power, Voting, and Voting Power: 30 Years After (pp. 27–62). Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Chen, T.-Y., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2020). Measuring Consumer Freedom.

Chew, S. H., & Sagi, J. S. (2008). Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory, 139(1), 1–24.

Dowding, K., & van Hees, M. (2009). Freedom of Choice. In Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.

Ebanks, B. R., Kannappan, P., & Ng, C. T. (1987). Generalized fundamental equation of information of multiplicative type. Aequationes Mathematicae, 32(1), 19–31.

Elmes, S., & Reny, P. J. (1994). On the Strategic Equivalence of Extensive Form Games. Journal of Economic Theory, 62, 1–23.

Erzurumluoglu, A. M., Liu, M., Jackson, V. E., Barnes, D. R., Datta, G., Melbourne, C. A., Young, R., Batini, C., Surendran, P., Jiang, T., Adnan, S. D., Afaq, S., Agrawal, A., Altmaier, E., Antoniou, A. C., Asselbergs, F. W., Baumbach, C., Bierut, L., Bertelsen, S., . . . Howson, J. M. M. (2019). Meta-analysis of up to 622,409 individuals identifies 40 novel smoking behaviour associated genetic loci. Molecular Psychiatry.

Giraud, G. (2003). Strategic market games: An introduction. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 39(5-6), 355–375.

Gorman, W. M. (1968). The Structure of Utility Functions. The Review of Economic Studies, 35(4), 367–390.

Gustafsson, J. E. (2010). Freedom of choice and expected compromise. Social Choice and Welfare, 35(1), 65–79.

Herstein, I. N., & Milnor, J. (1953). An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility. Econometrica, 21(2), 291–297.

Jones, P., & Sugden, R. (1982). Evaluating choice. International Review of Law and Economics, 2(1), 47–65.

Judd, K. L. (1985). The law of large numbers with a continuum of IID random variables. Journal of Economic Theory, 35(1), 19–25.

Kolm, S.-C. (2010). On real economic freedom. Social Choice and Welfare.

Koopmans, T. C. (1964). On flexibility of future preference. In M. W. Shelley & G. L. Bryan (Eds.), Human Judgments and Optimality. New York, Wiley.

Kraskov, A., Stogbauer, H., & Grassberger, P. (2004). Estimating mutual information. Physical review E, 69(6), 66138.

Kreps, D. M. (1979). A Representation Theorem for ”Preference for Flexibility”. Econometrica, 47(3), 565.

Mailath, G. J., Samuelson, L., & Swinkels, J. M. (1993). Extensive Form Reasoning in Normal Form Games. Econometrica, 61(2), 273.

Nehring, K., & Puppe, C. (1999). On the multi-preference approach to evaluating opportunities. Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 41–63.

Nehring, K., & Puppe, C. (2008). Diversity and the Metric of Opportunity, 18.

Nehring, K., & Puppe, C. (2009). Diversity. In Handbook of Rational and Social Choice. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press.

Neri, C., & Rommeswinkel, H. (2014). Freedom, Power, and Interference.

Pattanaik, P. K. (1994). Rights and freedom in welfare economics. European Economic Review, 38, 731–738.

Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (1990). On ranking opportunity sets in terms of freedom of choice. Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 56, 383–390.

Pattanaik, P. K., & Xu, Y. (1998). On preference and freedom. Theory and Decision, 44(2), 173–198.

Peleg, B. (1997). Effectivity functions, game forms, games, and rights. Social choice and welfare, 15(1), 67–80.

Peragine, V. (1999). The distribution and redistribution of opportunity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(1), 37–69.

Phibbs, C. F. (2009). The Montgomery bus boycott: A history and reference guide. Greenwood.

Puppe, C., & Xu, Y. (2010). Essential alternatives and freedom rankings. Social Choice and Welfare, 35(4), 669–685.

Rommeswinkel, H., & Wu, H. (2020). Monetary Policy Behind the Veil of Ignorance.

Rosenbaum, E. F. (2000). On Measuring Freedom. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(2), 205–227.

Ryan, M. (2016). Essentiality and convexity in the ranking of opportunity sets. Social Choice and Welfare, 47(4), 853–877.

Sen, A. (1988). Freedom of Choice: Concept and Content. European Economic Review, 32, 269–294.

Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379–423, 623–656.

Sher, I. (2018). Evaluating Allocations of Freedom. The Economic Journal, 128(612), 65–94.

Shnayderman, R. (2016). Ian Carter’s non-evaluative theory of freedom and diversity: A critique. Social Choice and Welfare, 46(1), 39–55.

Sugden, R. (1998). The Metric of Opportunity. Economics and Philosophy, 14, 307–337.

Sugden, R. (2003). Opportunity as a Space for Individuality: Its Value and the Impossibility of Measuring It. Ethics, 113(4), 783–809.

Sugden, R. (2004). The Opportunity Criterion: Consumer Sovereignty Without the Assumption of Coherent Preferences. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1014–1033.

Sugden, R. (2007). The value of opportunities when preferences are unstable. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 665–682.

Suppes, P. (1996). The nature and measurement of freedom. Social Choice and Welfare, 13(2), 183–200.

Theoharis, J. (2015). The rebellious life of Mrs. Rosa parks. Beacon Press.

Thompson, F. B. (1952). Equivalence of games in extensive form. RAND Corporation.

van Hees, M. (2004). Freedom of choice and diversity of options: Some difficulties. Social Choice and Welfare, 22(1), 253–266.

van Hees, M., & Wissenburg, M. (1999). Freedom and Opportunity. Political Studies, 47(1), 67–82.

Wooding, S., Kim, U.-k., Bamshad, M. J., Larsen, J., Jorde, L. B., & Drayna, D. (2004). Natural Selection and Molecular Evolution in PTC, a Bitter-Taste Receptor Gene. The American Journal of Human Genetics, 74(4), 637–646.