Munadi, Ernawati and Safa, Mohammad Samaun (2005): Business cycle transmission between the USA and Indonesia: A vector error correction model. Published in: International Journal of Management and Entrepreneurship , Vol. 1, No. 2 (15. December 2005): pp. 96-111.
Download (306kB) | Preview
There are several mechanisms that can account for short-run business cycle transmission. International trade is probably the major vehicle, and it forms a direct channel through which income and price shocks may be transmitted. Capital flows provide a second mechanism which is most likely to be responsible for the transmission of interest rate, monetary and exchange rate shocks. The study attempted to focus on the income shocks transmitted between a developed country and a developing country such as the USA and Indonesia. The transmission of industrial production, prices and interest rate shocks between the two countries have been examined along with an objective to test this proposition focusing on Indonesia. The study also considered the USA-Indonesia proposition by estimating a vector error correction model. The findings of the study show that there is no co-integration between U.S. and Indonesian industrial production. Therefore it does not appear that the USA drives Indonesian business cycle fluctuations and vice versa.
|Item Type:||MPRA Paper|
|Original Title:||Business cycle transmission between the USA and Indonesia: A vector error correction model|
|Keywords:||Business cycle; co-integration; error correction model, business transmission|
|Subjects:||C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables
E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles
|Depositing User:||Mohammad Samaun|
|Date Deposited:||27. Sep 2008 23:42|
|Last Modified:||13. Feb 2013 01:12|
Ambler, S. and Cardia, E. (2000). International transmission of the business cycle in a multi-sector model. European Economic Review, 46, pp. 273.
Canova, F, and Marrinan, J. (1998). Sources and propagation of international output cycles: Common shocks or transmission? Journal of International Economics, 46, pp. 133-166.
Engle, R. and C. Granger (1987). Co-integration and error correction representation, testing and telling. Econometrica, 55(2), pp. 251-276.
Grohe, S. S. (1997). The international transmission of economic fluctuations: Effects of U.S. business cycles on the Canadian economy. Journal of International Economics, 44, pp. 257-287.
Johanson, S. (1988). Statistical Analysis of co-integration vectors. Journal of economic dynamics and control, 12, pp. 231-254.
Johansen, J. A. and Juselius, K. (1990). Testing structural hypothesis in a multivariate cointigration analysis of the PPP and UIP for UK. Journal of Econometrics, 53, pp. 211-244.
Kearney, C. (2000). The determination and international transmission of stock market volatility. Global Finance Journal, 11, pp. 31-52.
Selover, D.D. (1997). Business Cycle Transmission between the United States and Japan: A vector error correction approach. Japan and World Economy, 9, pp. 385-411.
Selover, D.D. (1999a). International interdependence and business cycle transmission in ASEAN and Japan. Journal of International Economics, 13 (3), pp. 230-253.
Selover, D.D. and Jensen, R. (1999b). Mode-locking’ and international business cycle transmission. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23, pp. 591-618.
Semmler, W. 1994. Business Cycle Theory and Empirical Methods. Boston/ Dordrecht /London : Kluwer Academic Publishers.