Introduction of Weight-Based Charges for Domestic Solid Waste Disposal

Scott, Sue and Watson, Dorothy (2006): Introduction of Weight-Based Charges for Domestic Solid Waste Disposal. Published in: The Environmental Protection Agency No. Research Technological Development and Innovation (ERTDI) Programme of 2000-2006 (March 2007)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects on householder behaviour of the introduction of pay-by-weight as a method of charging households for waste collection. It is well known that, in theory, such charges would reduce the amount of waste collected but whether and how this would apply in an Irish case were questions worth investigating. A case study of the introduction of weight-based charges in West Cork obtained information on the amounts of household waste left out for collection in the year before and the year after the new charging regime was introduced. This body of data on weight of waste was supplemented by information obtained from a questionnaire administered to a representative sample of about 1200 households. The responsiveness to price is calculated as well as the impact of numbers in the household on weight of waste per capita. Attitudes on the important issue of how to finance waste services were obtained by asking respondents about payment methods, including payment through an increase in income tax.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Solid waste, pay by weight, price elasticity, attitudes to waste charges, household waste
• Subjects: Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q53 - Air Pollution ; Water Pollution ; Noise ; Hazardous Waste ; Solid Waste ; Recycling

References

Åberg, H., Dahlman, S., Shanahan, H. and Säljö, R., 1996. Towards Sound Environmental Behaviour: Exploring Household Participation in Waste Management. Journal of Consumer Policy 19: 45–67.

Andersen, M.S., Dengsøe, N. and Brendstrup, S., 1997. The Waste Tax 1987–1996 – an Ex-Post Evaluation of Incentives and Environmental Effects. Working Report for the Danish Environmental Protection Agency.

Bauer, S. and Miranda, M.L., 1996. The Urban Performance of Unit Pricing: An Analysis of Variable Rates for Residential Garbage Collection in Urban Areas. US EPA Cooperative Agreement #CR822-927-010.

Canterbury, J., 1994. Pay-As-You-Throw: Lessons Learned About Unit Pricing of Municipal Solid Waste. EPA Office of Solid Waste, Report # EPA530-R-94-004.

Coeck, C., S’Jegers, R., Verbeke, A. and Winkelmans, W., 1995. The Effects of Environmental Taxes: An Empirical Study of Water and Solid Waste Levies in Flanders. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics 66(4): 479–497.

CPA (Combat Poverty Agency), 2003. Waste Collection Charges and Low-Income Households. Policy Statement, Dublin, November.

DEHLG (Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government), 2005. The Race Against Waste. http://www.raceagainstwaste.ie/

DELG (Department of Environment and Local Government), 1998. Waste Management: Changing our Ways. Dublin September.

Dengsøe, N. and Andersen, M.S., 1999. Effects of the Increase in the Danish Waste Tax – with special focus on waste from industry and commerce. Working Report from the Danish Environmental Agency No. 23.

DKM, Aquavarra and ESRI, 2004. Economic Evaluation of Water Supply & Waste Water Projects – A Cost–Benefit Analysis. DKM Economic Consultants, Aquavarra Research, and ESRI. Commissioned by Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin Ireland.

Dunne, L., 2004. An Investigation into Waste Taxes and Charges. Working Paper 04/04. Planning and Environmental Policy Research Series, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

EPA, 2003. Assessment and Evaluation of Outlets of Compost Produced from Municipal Waste. Johnstown Castle Estate, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

EPA, 2005a. National Waste Report 2004. Environmental Protection Agency, Johnstown Castle Estate, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

EPA, 2005b. Dioxin Levels in the Irish Environment – Third Assessment (Summer 2004) Based on Levels in Cows’ Milk, Colman Concannon, Johnstown Castle Estate, Co. Wexford, Ireland.

Fenton, R. and Hanley, N., 1995. Economic instruments and waste minimization: the need for discard-relevant and purchase-relevant instruments. Environment and Planning A 27: 1317–1328.

Frey, B.S., 1993. Motivation as a limit to pricing. Journal of Economic Psychology 14: 635–664.

Fullerton, D. and Kinnaman, T.C., 1994. Household Demand for Garbage and Recycling Collection with the Start of a Price per Bag. NBER Working Paper No. 4670, Cambridge MA.

Fullerton, D. and Kinnaman, T.C., 1996. Household responses to pricing garbage by the bag. American Economic Review 86(4): 971–984.

Hong, S., 1999. The effects of unit pricing upon household solid waste management: the Korean experience. Journal of Environmental Management 57(1): 1–10.

Hong, S. and Adams, R.M., 1999. Household responses to price incentives for recycling: some further evidence. Land Economics 75(4): 505–514.

Hunter Waste Planning and Management Board of New South Wales, 1999. Variable Rate Charges for Domestic Waste Collection, prepared on behalf of the New South Wales Regional Waste Boards.

Jakus, P.M., Tiller, K.H. and Park, W.M., 1996. Generation of recyclables by rural households. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21(1): 96–108.

Jenkins, R.R., 1993. The Economics of Solid Waste Reduction: The Impact of User Fees. Edward Elgar, Hampshire, England.

Jenkins, R.R., Martinez, S.A., Palmer, K. and Podolsky, M.J., 2003. The Determinants of Household Recycling: A material-specific analysis of recycling program features and unit pricing. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 45(2): 294–318.

Kemper, P. and Quigley, J.M., 1976. The Economics of Refuse Collection. Cambridge. Ballinger Publishing Company, MA.

Lawlor, J., McCarthy, C. and Scott, S., 2007. Investment in water infrastructure – findings from an economic analysis of a national programme. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 50(1): in press.

Linderhof, V., Kooreman, P., Allers, M. and Wiersma, D., 2001. Weight-based pricing in the collection of household waste: the Oostzaan CASE. Resource and Energy Economics 23: 359–371.

Markowitz, P., 1991. Winning strategies for curbside and dropoff. BioCycle 32(4): 39–41.

Miranda, M.L., Everett, J.W., Blume, D. and Roy, B., 1994. Market-based incentives and residential municipal solid waste. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(4): 681–698.

Morgenroth, E., 2005. Waste collection, double taxation and local finance. In: Callan, T. and Doris, A. (eds) Budget Perspectives 2006. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.

Morris, G.M. and Holthausen, D.M., 1994. The economics of household solid waste generation and disposal. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 215–234.

Nestor, Vaughan, D. and Podolsky, M.J., 1998. Assessing incentive-based environmental policies for reducing household waste disposal. Contemporary Economic Policy 16: 401–411.

OECD, 2005. Improving Recycling Markets. Working Group on Waste Prevention and Recycling. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR(2005)3/FINAL .

OECD, 2006. Working Group on Waste Prevention and Recycling – Impacts of Unit-based Waste Collection Charges. Report prepared by D. Hogg of Eunomia Research & Consulting Ltd. ENV/EPOC/WGWPR(2005)10/FINAL.

Pearce, D. and Brisson, I., 2004. The economic approach to MSW policy. In: Quadrio Curzio, A., Prosperitte, L. and Zoboli, R. (eds) The Management of Municipal Solid Waste in Europe. Elsevier Science.

Reschovsky, J.D. and Stone, S.E., 1994. Market incentives to encourage household waste recycling: paying for what you throw away. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13(1): 120–139.

Rhee, J.J., 1999. Economic incentives and optimal waste management: Korean experiences in unit pricing for garbage collection. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 2: 113–128.

SBI (Statens Byggeforskningsinstitut), 1996. Afffald i Boligområder. Livsstil Og Affaldsvaner SBI-rapport 261.

Scott, S., 1991. Domestic Electricity Demand. GRS paper no. 151. March. Economic and Social Research Institute, Dublin, Ireland.

Scott, S. and Lawlor, J., 1997. Environmental services. Chapter in: Barrett, A., Lawlor, J. and Scott, S. (eds) The Fiscal System and the Polluter Pays Principle. Ashgate, Aldershot.

Skumatz, L. and Breckinridge, C., 1990. Handbook for Solid Waste Officials. Vol. 2. EPA 530-SW-90-084B, Washington DC.

Sterner, T. and Bartelings, H., 1999. Household waste management in a Swedish municipality: determinants of waste disposal, recycling and composting. Environmental and Resource Economics 13(4): 473–491.

Strathman, J.G., Rufolo, A.M. and Mildner, G.C.S., 1995. The demand for solid waste disposal. Land Economics 71(1): 57–64.

Thøgersen, J., 1994. Monetary incentives and environmental concern: effects of a differentiated garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy 17: 407–442.

Van Houtven, G.L. and Morris, G.E., 1999. Household behavior under alternative pay-as-you-throw systems for solid waste disposal. Land Economics 75(4): 515–537.

Wertz, K.L., 1976. Economic factors influencing households' production of refuse. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2(3): 263–272.