Why the concept of Hicks, Harrod, Solow neutral and even non-neutral augmented technical progress is flawed in principle in any economic model

de la Fonteijne, Marcel R. (2018): Why the concept of Hicks, Harrod, Solow neutral and even non-neutral augmented technical progress is flawed in principle in any economic model.

Abstract

It is already known for several decades that the implementation of capital augmented technical progress, as is done to date, leads to the conclusion that the CES production has to be Cobb-Douglas or there exists labor augmented technical progress only. This is the so-called Cobb-Douglas labor augmented only paradox. Institutions keep on using this way of thinking in their models in spite of the theoretical inconsistency. We reject the old concept, i.e., all kind of neutral and non-neutral capital and labor augmented technical progress and introduce a new implementation of technical progress to avoid this theoretical problem. We explain the term labor saving technical progress, showing that technical progress is always relatively labor saving. We also analyze the problem on how to estimate the coefficient of elasticity of substitution. Economic growth is presented as partly exogenous, due to technical progress, and partly endogenous, due to capital growth. We introduce formulas to convert total factor productivity into economic growth to show the connection. This new theory is not limited to growth models but can be used also in DSGE models and possibly also in other areas where CES functions are useful. It will give you a different angle of view on the Solow model. And last but not least we will show the connection between Solow’s growth accounting and neo-classical growth theory.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Capital and Labor Augmented Technical Progress, Growth Model, Maximum Profit Condition, Production Functions, General Technological Progress, Capital-Labor-mix, Estimation of the Elasticity of Substitution, DSGE, Total Factor Productivity, Solow model, Hicks, Harris, Labor Saving
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E0 - General > E00 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E20 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E23 - Production; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity

References

Acemoglu, D., 2003, Labor- and Capital-Augmenting Technical Change, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 1, No. 1 (Mar., 2003), pp. 1-37, MIT Press, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40005140

Acemoglu, D., Guerrieri, V., 2006, Capital Deepening And Non-Balanced Economic Growth, NBER Working Paper Series, Working Paper 12475, http://www.nber.org/papers/w12475

Acemoglu, D., 2008, Introduction to modern economic growth, Princeton University Press

Arrow, K. J.; Chenery, H. B.; Minhas, B. S.; Solow, R. M. (1961). "Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency". Review of Economics and Statistics. The MIT Press. 43 (3): 225–250

Barelli, P., Abreu Pessôa S. de, 2003, Inada conditions imply that production function must be asymptotically Cobb–Douglas, Economics Letters 81 (2003) 361 – 363 http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/1012

Barro, Robert J., Sala-i-Martin, Xavier, 2003, Economic Growth, Second Edition, MIT Press

Brugger, F., Gehrke, C., 2017, The Neoclassical Approach to Induced Technical Change: From Hicks to Acemoglu, Metroeconomica, 2017, vol. 68, issue 4, 730-776

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2011, Exploring stability and other fundamentals in a simple economy model, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/72850/

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2013, The Monetary Profit Paradox and a Sustainable Economy: A Fundamental Approach, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/55235/

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2014a, An Inconsistency in using Stock Flow Consistency in Modelling the Monetary Profit Paradox, Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 8 (2014-15): 1—7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-15

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2014b, Okun's Law, Dead or Alive: A Fundamental Approach, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83911/

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2015a, Jones on Piketty’s r>g: A critique, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/83830/

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2015b, Do Inada Conditions imply Cobb-Douglas Asymptotic Behavior or only a Elasticity of Substitution equal to one, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82304/

De la Fonteijne, Marcel R., 2016, The (F)Laws of Piketty’s Capitalism: A Fundamental Approach, MPRA, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/72719/

Diamond, P. A. and McFadden, D. (1965). Identification of the Elasticity of Substitution and the bias of Technical Change: An Impossibility Theorem. Working Paper No. 62, University of California Berkeley.

Diamond, P. A., McFadden, D., and Rodriguez, M. (1978). Measurement of the elasticity of substitution and bias of technical change. In Fuss, M. and McFadden, D., editors, Production Economics, Vol. 2, pages 125–147. Amsterdam and North Holland, https://eml.berkeley.edu/~mcfadden/prodecon/apps/ch12.pdf

Donselaar, P., 2011, Innovation and productivity: The Solow residual disentangled, Ridderkerk, Ridderkerk bv, thesis in Dutch.

Hahn, Frank H., 1965, On Two-Sector Growth Models, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 32, No. 4 (Oct., 1965), pp. 339-346, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2295840

Jacobs, B., 2014, blog, https://basjacobs.wordpress.com/tag/piketty/, 2018-01-07

Inada, K.-I., 1963, On a two-sector model of economic growth: comments and a generalization. Review of Economic Studies, 30 (2), 119–127, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2295809

Jones, C.I., 2003, Growth, Capital Shares, and a New Perspective on Production Functions, Econ Papers, Proceedings, 2003, issue Nov, http://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:fip:fedfpr:y:2003:i:nov:x:2

Jones, Charles I., Scrimgeour, Dean, 2004, The Steady-State Growth Theorem: A Comment on Uzawa (1961), NBER Working Paper No. 10921, http://www.nber.org/papers/w10921.pdf

Jones, C. I. (2005). The shape of production functions and the direction of technical change. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2):517–549, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/JonesQJE2005.pdf

Jones, C.I., Scrimgeour, D., 2008, A new proof of Uzawa’s steady-state growth theorem, The Review of Economics and Statistics, February 2008, 90(1): 180–182, https://web.stanford.edu/~chadj/JonesScrimgeour2008.pdf

Jones, C.I., 2013, Introduction to economic growth, WW Norton & Co

Klump, R., Preissler, H., 2000, Ces Production Functions and Economic Growth, Scand. J. of Economics, 102(1), 41-56, 2000

Klump, R., et al., 2007, Factor Substitution and Factor Augmenting Technical Progress in the US: A Normalized Supply-Side System Approach, Review of Economics and Statistics, Volume 89, Issue 1, February 2007, p.183-192, https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.89.1.183

Klump, R., McAdam, P., Willman, A., 2011, The normalized CES Production function theory and empirics, ECB Working Paper Series, No 1294, http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=1761410

Krusell, P., 2014, Real Macroeconomic Theory, version 2014, http://hassler-j.iies.su.se/courses/macroII/Notes/Perbook2010.pdf per 12 dec 2018

León-Ledesma, M. A., McAdam, P. and Willman, A. (2010), ‘Identifying the Elasticity of Substitution with Biased Technical Change’, American Economic Review pp. 1330–1357.

Litina, A., Palivos, T., 2008, Do Inada conditions imply that production function must be asymptotically Cobb–Douglas? A comment, Economics Letters 99 (2008) 498–499 http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/bitstream/10438/1012/3/1324.pdf

Piketty, T., 2014, Capital in the Twenty-First Century, translation from: Le capital au XXI siècle (2013). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

Paul M. Romer, 1990, Endogenous technological change, Journal of Political Economy, 98(5 pt.2):S71–S102, October 1990.

Romer, P., 2015, Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 2015, 105(5): 89–93, http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151066

Saam, M., 2014, The Identification of Directed Technical Change Revisited, Centre for European Economic Research (ZEW), Discussion Paper No. 14-127, http://ftp.zew.de/pub/zew-docs/dp/dp14127.pdf

Solow, R.M., 1956, A contribution to the theory of economic growth, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 70: 65–94 (1956)

Solow, R.M., 1957, Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3 (Aug., 1957), pp. 312-320, http://www.jstor.org/stable/1926047

Solow, R.M., 1994, Perspectives on Growth Theory, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 8(1), Winter 1994, p. 45-54

Solow, R.M., 1961, Note on Uzawa’s two-sector model of economic growth, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29: p. 48–50

Stiglitz, Joseph, 1967, A Two Sector Two Class Model of Economic Growth, Review of Economic Studies, 1967, vol. 34, issue 2, 227-238, https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:oup:restud:v:34:y:1967:i:2:p:227-238

Stiglitz, Joseph, 2014, Unemployment and Innovation, NBER Working Paper No. 20670, https://www.nber.org/papers/w20670

Uzawa, Hirofumi, 1961-1, Neutral Inventions and the Stability of Growth Equilibrium, Review of Economic Studies, February 1961, 28 (2), 117.124

Uzawa, H., 1961-2, On a two-sector model of economic growth, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 29 (1961-1962)

Uzawa, H., 1962, On a two-sector model of economic growth II, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 30 (1962-1963)