A Chayanovian approach to vulnerability: Re-evaluation of Vulnerability using Indian Data

Sengupta, Atanu and Seth, Ujjwal (2021): A Chayanovian approach to vulnerability: Re-evaluation of Vulnerability using Indian Data.

Abstract

Vulnerability is regarded as the ability of withstand income shocks. This is true of the functioning –entitlement approach, the social constructivist approach, or the qualitative approach (Addison, Hulme and Kanbur 2009). In the standard economic theory, a somewhat distinction is made between production and income. While the battery of production analysis uses terms such as efficiency, technological diffusion, and scale economies and so on, the earning side are related to poverty, inequality, subsistence and host of such issues. In the present paper, we used the approach pursued by A. V. Chayanov. In the approach of Chayanov (1966, 1989), for the life of poor, production and earnings are so strongly correlated that it would be impossible to dichotomise them. In fact, it would be wrong and probably unjust to do so. Keeping this idea in view, we have constructed the vulnerability indices for Indian states based on production data. Our data reveals that the vulnerability in India is more widespread than is commonly thought. We have also examined various factors that are responsible for this scenario. In short, our exercise puts forth a completely different picture of vulnerability in India than is commonly thought.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Vulnerability; Poverty; Informal; Covid, NSSO, Unorganised
• Subjects: O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O17 - Formal and Informal Sectors ; Shadow Economy ; Institutional Arrangements

References

1. Addison, Tony & Hulme, David & Kanbur, R. (2009). Poverty Dynamics: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199557547.001.0001.

2. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2012). Poor economics: a radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. Paperback edition. New York: Public Affairs.

3. Bardhan Pranab (1984), Land, Labor, and Rural Poverty – Essays in Development Economics , Columbia University Press

4. Bardhan Pranab (2003), Poverty, Agrarian Structure, and Political Economy in India: Selected Essays, Oxford University Press.

5. Bhaduri, A. (1973). A Study in Agricultural Backwardness Under Semi-Feudalism. The Economic Journal, 83(329), 120. https://doi.org/10.2307/2231104

6. Bharadwaj, K. (1978). Maurice Dobb’s critique of theories of value and distribution. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a035383

7. Raychaudhuri, A., & Haldar, S. K. (2009). An investigation into the inter-district disparity in West Bengal, 1991-2005. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26–27), 258–263.

8. Chakrabarti, S. (2010). Concept and method of ascertaining assets of rural households. The Journal of Income and Wealth, 32 (1),3–13.

9. Chambers, R. (1989). Editorial Introduction: Vulnerability, Coping and Policy. IDS Bulletin 20(2), 1-7

10. Chancel L. and Piketty T. (2017). Indian Economic Inequality. 1922-2015: https://wid.world/document/chancelpikety2017widworld/

11. Chattopadhyay M. and Sengupta A. (2001). Farm Size and Sharecropping Efficiency: Some theoretical issues. Keio Economic Studies,37(2).

12. Chaudhuri, S., J. Jalan and A. Suryahadi (2002). “Assessing Household Vulnerability to Poverty from Cross-sectional Data: A Methodology and Estimates from Indonesia”, Discussion Paper, Columbia University, New York.

13. Chayanov, A. V. (1966). A. V. Chayanov on the Theory of Peasant Economy, Univ. of Wisconsin Press, Madison

14. Chayanov, A. V. (1989). The Peasant Economy: Collected Works. Moscow. Ekonomika.

15. Clark W.C. et.al. (2000). Assessing Vulnerability to Global Environmental Risk, Discussion Paper, 2000-12, Environment and Natural Resources Program, Belfer Center, September 2000.

16. Harris, J., and M. Todaro (1970). Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. American Economic Review 40, 126–142.

17. Harriss J. (2009). Bringing Politics Back into Poverty analysis: Why Understanding of Social Relations Matters More for Policy on Chronic Poverty than Measurement in Addison T, Hulme D ,Kanbur R. 2009. Poverty Dynamics - Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Oxford University Press, USA.

18. Kamanou, Gisele and Morduch, Jonathan (2002). Measuring Vulnerability to Poverty. World Institute for Development Economic Research. (UNU-WIDER). Working Papers. :10.1093/0199276838.003.0009.

19. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies 22, 139–191.

20. Marshall, Alfred (1920). Principles of Economics (Revised ed.). London: Macmillan; reprinted by Prometheus Books.

21. Moser, Caroline O.N.(1998). The asset vulnerability framework: Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies. World Development , 26(1), 1-19

22. Samuelson Paul. A., William D. Nordhaus Special Indian Adaption 2020, Indian Adaption by Dr S. Chaudhuri and Dr. Anindya Sen (2020). Economics. McGraw Hill Education (India) Private Limited.

23. Sengupta Atanu , Sanjoy De, Anirban Hazra, Ujjwal Seth (2020). The Trails of a Blood-Sucking Vampire: Ingredients of COV19 Pandemic Analysis. Mainstream. VOL LVIII No 19 New Delhi, April 25.

24. Sengupta, Atanu & Ghose, Manas, (2010). Vulnerability in India: A Simple Consumption-based Approach. Indian Journal of Human Development. 4. 393-405.

25. Shaffer, Paul & Kanbur, Ravi & Sandbrook, Richard. (2019). Immiserizing Growth: When Growth Fails the Poor.:Introduction.

26. Sinha, Saurabh & Lipton, Michael & Church, Joanna & Leavy, Jennifer & Litchfield, Julie & Ronchi, Loraine & Straub, Rachael & Yaqub, Shahin. (1999). DAMAGING FLUCTUATIONS, RISK AND POVERTY: A REVIEW. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2000/2001.

27. Watts, Michael & Bohle, Hans-Georg. (1993). The Space of Vulnerability: The Causal Structure of Hunger and Famine. Progress in Human Geography - PROG HUM GEOGR. 17. 43-67. 10.1177/030913259301700103.