Rent-Seeking Government and Endogenous Takeoff in a Schumpeterian Economy

Chu, Angus C. (2020): Rent-Seeking Government and Endogenous Takeoff in a Schumpeterian Economy.

Abstract

This study explores how the rent-seeking behavior of the government may impede economic development and delay industrialization. Introducing a rent-seeking government to a Schumpeterian growth model that features endogenous takeoff, we find that a more self-interested government engages in more rent-seeking taxation, which delays the economy's transition from pre-industrial stagnation to modern economic growth. Quantitatively, a completely self-interested government could have delayed industrialization, relative to a benevolent government, by almost two centuries in the UK.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: rent-seeking government; endogenous takeoff; industrialization
• Subjects: H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity

References

Acemoglu, D., and Robinson, A., 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown.

Aghion, P., and Howitt, P., 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica, 60, 323-351.

Allen, R., 2011. Global Economic History: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ang, J., and Madsen, J., 2011. Can second-generation endogenous growth models explain the productivity trends and knowledge production in the Asian miracle economies?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 1360-1373.

Chang, M.-J., Wang, P., and Xie, D., 2016. The dynamic process of economic takeoff and industrial transformation. Frontiers of Economics in China, 11, 60-87.

Chaudhry, A., and Garner, P., 2007. Do governments suppress growth? Institutions, rent-seeking, and innovation blocking in a model of Schumpeterian growth. Economics and Politics, 19, 35-52.

Chu, A., 2010. Nation states vs. united empire: Effects of political competition on economic growth. Public Choice, 145, 181-195.

Chu, A., Fan, H., and Wang, X., 2020. Status-seeking culture and development of capitalism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 180, 275-290.

Chu, A., Kou, Z., and Wang, X., 2020. Effects of patents on the transition from stagnation to growth. Journal of Population Economics, 33, 395-411.

Chu, A., Peretto, P., and Wang, X., 2020. Agricultural revolution and industrialization. MPRA Paper No. 101224.

DeLong, B., and Shleifer, A., 1993. Princes and merchants: European city growth before the industrial revolution. Journal of Law & Economics, 36, 671-702.

Desmet, K., and Parente, S., 2012. The evolution of markets and the revolution of industry: A unified theory of growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 17, 205-234.

Dinopoulos, E., and Thompson, P., 1998. Schumpeterian growth without scale effects. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 313-335.

Drazen, A., 2000. Political Economy in Macroeconomics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ferraro, D., Ghazi, S., and Peretto, P., 2020. Implications of tax policy for innovation and aggregate productivity growth. European Economic Review, 130, 103590.

Galor, O., 2005. From stagnation to growth: Unified growth theory. Handbook of Economic Growth, 1, 171-293.

Galor, O., 2011. Unified Growth Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Galor, O., and Moav, O., 2002. Natural selection and the origin of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1133-1192.

Galor, O., Moav, O., and Vollrath, D., 2009. Inequality in landownership, the emergence of human-capital promoting institutions, and the great divergence. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 143-179.

Galor, O., and Mountford, A., 2008. Trading population for productivity: Theory and evidence. Review of Economic Studies, 75, 1143-1179.

Galor, O., and Weil, D., 2000. Population, technology and growth: From the Malthusian regime to the demographic transition. American Economic Review, 110, 806-828.

Grossman, G., and Helpman, E., 1991. Quality ladders in the theory of growth. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 43-61.

Ha, J., and Howitt, P., 2007. Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 33, 733-774.

Hansen, G., and Prescott, E., 2002. Malthus to Solow. American Economic Review, 92, 1205-1217.

Howitt, P., 1999. Steady endogenous growth with population and R&D inputs growing. Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730.

Iacopetta, M., and Peretto, P., 2021. Corporate governance and industrialization. European Economic Review, forthcoming.

Jones, C., 2001. Was an industrial revolution inevitable? Economic growth over the very long run. The B.E. Journal of Macroeconomics (Advances), 1, 1-45.

Kalemli-Ozcan, S., 2002. Does the mortality decline promote economic growth?. Journal of Economic Growth, 7, 411-439.

Laincz, C., and Peretto, P., 2006. Scale effects in endogenous growth theory: An error of aggregation not specification. Journal of Economic Growth, 11, 263-288.

Madsen, J., 2008. Semi-endogenous versus Schumpeterian growth models: Testing the knowledge production function using international data. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 1-26.

Madsen, J., 2010. The anatomy of growth in the OECD since 1870. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57, 753-767.

Peretto, P., 1994. Essays on Market Structure and Economic Growth. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

Peretto, P., 1998. Technological change and population growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 283-311.

Peretto, P., 1999. Cost reduction, entry, and the interdependence of market structure and economic growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 43, 173-195.

Peretto, P., 2003. Fiscal policy and long-run growth in R&D-based models with endogenous market structure. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 325-347.

Peretto, P., 2007. Corporate taxes, growth and welfare in a Schumpeterian economy. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 353-382.

Peretto, P., 2011. The growth and welfare effects of deficit-financed dividend tax cuts. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 43, 835-869.

Peretto, P., 2015. From Smith to Schumpeter: A theory of take-off and convergence to sustained growth. European Economic Review, 78, 1-26.

Romer, P., 1990. Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71-S102.

Segerstrom, P., Anant, T., and Dinopoulos, E., 1990. A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 80, 1077-91.

Smulders, S., 1994. Growth, Market Structure and the Environment: Essays on the Theory of Endogenous Economic Growth. Ph.D. dissertation, Tilburg University.

Spinesi, L., 2009. Rent-seeking bureaucracies, inequality, and growth. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 244-257.

Wang, P., and Xie, D., 2004. Activation of a modern industry. Journal of Development Economics, 74, 393-410.

Young, A., 1998. Growth without scale effects. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 41-63.