Tinoco, Marcos (2020): Modelando la volatilidad del diferencial TED: Una evaluación de pronósticos de modelos con heterocedasticidad condicional.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108086.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
This document evaluates the predictive power of two models for the TED spread, an ARMA model (Autoregressive–moving-average model) that only considers the conditional mean and an ARMA-GARCH-M model (Autoregressive model with conditional heteroscedasticity) that considers both the mean and the conditional variance, in order to determine if there is loss of information by not considering the variance in the calculation of the mean, taking as criteria the mean square error (ECM), the root mean square error (RECM), and the Diaebold and Mariano test (DM). The results obtained indicate that all the forecasts show a fairly low ECM, a lower RECM than that of the benchmark model (Random walk model) and the DM test indicates that the ARMA model presents a better fit compared to the ARMA-GARCH-M model. This leads us to conclude that despite the fact that the TED spread series presents volatility, there are no significant losses in short-term forecasts, considering only the conditional mean.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Modelando la volatilidad del diferencial TED: Una evaluación de pronósticos de modelos con heterocedasticidad condicional. |
English Title: | Modeling the volatility of the TED spread: An assessment of model forecasts with conditional heteroscedasticity. |
Language: | Spanish |
Keywords: | ARMA Models, GARCH-M Models, Conditional Mean, Variance. |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C53 - Forecasting and Prediction Methods ; Simulation Methods G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G10 - General G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G17 - Financial Forecasting and Simulation |
Item ID: | 108086 |
Depositing User: | Marcos Roberto Tinoco Palacios |
Date Deposited: | 02 Jun 2021 08:19 |
Last Modified: | 02 Jun 2021 08:19 |
References: | Bianchi, R. J., Drew, M. E., & Wijeratne, T. R. (2010). Systemic Risk, the TED Spread and Hedge Fund Returns. Box, G. E., & Jenkins, G. (1976). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. Holden-Day, San Francisco. Engle, R. F. (1982). Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity With Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation. Engle, R. F., Lilien, D. M., & Robins, R. P. (1987). Estimating Time Varying Risk Premia in the Term Structure: The Arch-M Model. González-Hermosillo, B., & Hesse, H. (2009). Global Market Conditions and Systemic Risk. Granger, C. W., & Ramanathan, R. (1984). Improved methods of combining forecasts. Lashgari, M. (2000). The Role of TED Spread and Confidence Index in Explaining the Behavior of Stock Prices. American Business Review. Tse, Y., & Booth, G. (1996). Common volatility and volatility spillovers between US and Eurodollar interest rates: Evidence from the futures market. Westrupp, V. (2012). The TED Spread as a Risk Factor in The Cross Section of Stock Returns. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108086 |