Management decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: A proposed modification for large-scale problems

Islam, Rafikul and Abdullah, Nur Anisah (2005): Management decision making by the analytic hierarchy process: A proposed modification for large-scale problems. Published in: Journal of International Business and Entrepreneurship Development , Vol. 3, No. 1/2 (2006): pp. 18-40.

Abstract

Frequently, management decision making problems involve multiple criteria/objectives/attributes. Over the years, many quantitative methods have been developed to facilitate making rational decisions involving multiple criteria. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is, in general, regarded as one of the most successful techniques to solve decision making problems involving multiple criteria. In AHP, the decision maker starts by constructing the overall hierarchy of the decision problem. The hierarchy consists of criteria, subcriteria and alternatives of the decision making problem. A number of pairwise comparison matrices are formed in order to derive weights of the criteria and the local weights of the alternatives. Subsequently, the principle of hierarchical composition is used to determine the global weights of the alternatives. The alternative with the highest global weight is selected as the best alternative. The drawback of the traditional AHP is that it requires a large number of pairwaise comparisons, especially in the presence of a large number of criteria. The present empirical study attempts to investigate the possibility of eliminating insignificant criteria in order to reduce AHP computational time. Using the Expert Choice software, findings confirm that criteria that carry comparatively lesser weights can be excluded from the hierarchy and thereby the total time required for making the pairwise comparisons can be reduced drastically. To solve large-scale enterprise multi-criteria decision making problems (that involve large number of criteria) by AHP, it is proposed that at the very outset, decision makers can apply nominal group technique to identify the insignificant criteria. These criteria can be dropped from subsequent analysis and this exclusion will not affect the final decision significantly. This proposed methodology is expected to enhance the applicability of AHP in solving various kinds of larger sized multi-criteria decision making problems in any enterprise.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Multiple criteria decision making, Analytic hierarchy process, Nominal group technique, Large-scale problems, International business
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F2 - International Factor Movements and International Business > F23 - Multinational Firms ; International Business; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods; M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M10 - General

References

Bahmani, N., Javalgi, G. and Blumberg, A. (1986), “An application of the analytic hierarchy process for a consumer choice problem”, Marketing Science, Vol. 9, pp. 402-406.

Basak, I. and Saaty, T.L. (1993), “Group decision making using the analytic hierarchy process”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 17, pp.101-109.

Bhutta, K.S. and Huq, F. (2002), “Supplier selection problem: a comparison of the total cost of ownership and analytic hierarchy process approaches”, Supply Chain Management, Vol. 7 No. 3/4, pp. 126-135.

Bolster, J., Janjigian, Vahan, and Trahan, A. (1995), “Determining investor suitability using the analytic hierarchy process”, Financial Analysis Journal, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 63-73.

Cheng, C. H. (1997), “Evaluating naval teaching missile systems by fuzzy AHP based on the grade value of membership function”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 96 No. 2, pp. 342-350.

Cheng, E.W.L. and Li, H. (2001), “Information priority-setting for better resource allocation using analytic hierarchy process”, Information Management and Computer Security, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 61-70.

Chin, K.S., Chiu, S. and Tummala, V.M.R. (1999), “An evaluation of success factors using the AHP to implement ISO 14001-based EMS”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 341-361.

Davies, M. (2001), “Adaptive AHP: a review of marketing applications with extensions”, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35 No. 7/8, pp. 872-893.

Davis, L. and Williams, G. (1994), “Evaluating and selecting simulation software using the analytic hierarchy process”, Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 23-32.

Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A. H., and Gustafson, D.H. (1975), Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Process, Scott-Foresman, Glenview, It.

Dyer, R.F., Forman, Ernest, H. and Mustafa, M. (1992), “Decision support for media selection using the analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Advertising, Vol. 21 No. 1.

Harker, P. T. (1987a), “Alternatives modes of questioning in the analytic hierarchy process”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, pp. 41-46.

Harker, P.T. (1987b), “Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the analytic hierarchy process”, Mathematical Modelling, Vol. 9, pp. 353-360.

Islam, R., Biswal, M.P. and Alam, S.S. (1997), “Clusterization of alternatives in the analytic hierarchy process”, Military Operations Research, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 69-78.

Joh, C. H. (1997), “Analytic hierarchy process for robot selection”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 16 No. 5, pp. 381-386.

Kim, S. C. and Min, K. J. (2004), “Determining multi-criteria priorities in the planning of electric power generation: the development of an analytic hierarchy process for using the opinions of experts”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 186-193.

Labib, A.W., O’Connor, R.F. and Williams, G.B. (1998), “An effective maintenance system using the analytic hierarchy process”, Integrated Manufacturing System, Vol. 9 No. 2.

Liang, W. Y. (2003), “The analytic hierarchy process in project evaluation: an R & D case study in Taiwan”, Benchmarking, Vol. 10 No. 5, pp. 445-456.

Lim, K. H. and Swenseth, S.R. (1993), “An iterative procedure for reducing problem size in large scale AHP problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 67, pp. 64-74.

Millet, Ido and Wedley, William C. (2002), Modelling risk and uncertainty with the analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 97-107.

Min, Hokey (1994), “Location analysis of international consolidation terminals using the analytic hierarchy process”, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 15 No. 2, pp. 25-44.

Ramanathan, R. and Ganesh, L.S. (1995), “Using AHP for resource allocation problems”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 80, pp. 410-417.

Razmi, J., Rahnejat, H. and Khan. M.K. (1998), “Use of analytic hierarchy process in classification of push, pull and hybrid push-pull systems for production planning”, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 18 No. 11, pp. 1134-1151.

Saaty, T. L. (1977), “A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures”, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15, pp. 234-281.

Saaty, T. L. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Saaty, T.L. (1987), “Risk-its priority and probability: the analytic hierarchy process”, Risk Analysis, Vol. 7, pp. 159-172.

Saaty, T.L. (1991), “Modelling the graduate business school admission process”, Socio-Economic Planning Science, Vol. 25, pp.155-162.

Saaty, T.L. and Forman, E.H. (2000), The Hierarchon: A Dictionary of Hierarchies, AHP Publications Series, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.

Saaty, T.L. and Gholamnezhad, H. (1981), “Oil prices: 1985 and 1990”, Energy System and Policy, Vol. 5, pp. 303-318.

Tadisina, S.K., Troutt, M. D. and Bhasin, V. (1991), “Selecting a doctoral program using the analytic hierarchy process – the importance of perspectives”, Journal of Operational Research Society, Vol. 12 No. 8, pp. 631-638.

Udo, Godwin G. (2000), “Using analytic hierarchy process to analyze the information technology outsourcing decision”, Industrial Management and Data Systems, Vol. 100 No. 9, pp. 421-429.

Weiss, E. N. and Rao, V. R. (1987), “AHP design issues for large-scale systems”, Decision Science, Vol. 8, pp. 43-68.