Yoo, Sunbin and Hong, Sungwan and Park, Yeongkyung and Okuyama, Akihiro and Zhang, Zhaozhe and Yoshida, Yoshikuni and Managi, Shunsuke (2021): Danger, Respect, and Indifference: Bike-Sharing Choices in Shanghai and Tokyo using Latent Choice Models.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108312.pdf Download (459kB) | Preview |
Abstract
While various policy instruments have attempted to raise environmental concerns in the past decades, it is unclear if these concerns are revealed in the consumer choices of our daily life. In this study, we investigate whether environmental concerns drive the choices of modes of transport through the bike-sharing example in Tokyo and Shanghai. We conducted a survey questionnaire to define three types of environmental concerns and quantitatively estimated their effects on bike-sharing choices using the latent class model, considering individual heterogeneity. The results show that environmental concerns affect bike-sharing choices differently for different people. While the fear of natural disasters and/or an indifference towards the environment would be dominant factors in commuting, the willingness to preserve a natural environment shows substantial correlations to bike-sharing when respondents return from weekend shopping. These differences indicate that relevant policies should be effectively implemented to interact with such environmental concerns.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Danger, Respect, and Indifference: Bike-Sharing Choices in Shanghai and Tokyo using Latent Choice Models |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Bike-sharing; shared transportation; demand estimation; latent choice model; latent class; environmental concern |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L62 - Automobiles ; Other Transportation Equipment ; Related Parts and Equipment Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q55 - Technological Innovation R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R4 - Transportation Economics |
Item ID: | 108312 |
Depositing User: | Dr Sunbin Yoo |
Date Deposited: | 17 Jun 2021 06:16 |
Last Modified: | 17 Jun 2021 06:16 |
References: | 1. Bai, Lu, N.N. Sze, Pan Liu, and Amy Guo Haggart, “Effect of environmental awareness on electric bicycle users mode choices,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environ- ment, 2020, 82, 102320. 2. Bamberg, Sebastian, Icek Ajzen, and Peter Schmidt, “The Roles of Past Behavior, Habit, and Reasoned Action,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 2013, 25 (3). 3. Ben-Akiva, Moshe, Daniel Mcfadden, Kenneth Train, Joan Walker, Chandra Bhat, Michel Bierlaire, Denis Bolduc, Axel Boersch-Supan, David Brownstone, David S. Bunch, Andrew Daly, Andre De Palma, Dinesh Gopinath, Anders Karlstrom, and Marcela A. Munizaga, “Hybrid Choice Models: Progress and Challenges,” Marketing Letters, Aug 2002, 13 (3), 163–175. 4. Bieliski, Tomasz, Agnieszka Kwapisz, and Agnieszka Wana, “Electric bike-sharing services mode substitution for driving, public transit, and cycling,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2021, 96, 102883. 5. Bonan, Jacopo, Cristina Cattaneo, Giovanna dAdda, and Massimo Tavoni, “Can social information programs be more effective? The role of environmental identity for energy conser- vation,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2021, p. 102467. 6. Bulte, Erwin, Shelby Gerking, John A. List, and Aart de Zeeuw, “The effect of varying the causes of environmental problems on stated WTP values: evidence from a field study,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2005, 49 (2), 330–342. 7. Bcker, Lars and Ellinor Anderson, “Interest-adoption discrepancies, mechanisms of media- tion and socio-spatial inclusiveness in bike-sharing: The case of nine urban regions in Norway,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 140, 266–277. 8. Cai, Sijia, Xingle Long, Liang Li, Hui Liang, Qinglin Wang, and Xiping Ding, “Deter- minants of intention and behavior of low carbon commuting through bicycle-sharing in China,” Journal of Cleaner Production, March 2019, 212, 602–609. 9. Campbell, Andrew A., Christopher R. Cherry andn Megan S. Ryerson, and Xinmiao Yang, “Factors Influencing the Choice of Shared Bicycles and Shared Electric Bikes in Beijing,” Transportation Research Part C, 2016, 67, 399–414. 10. Cheng, Yung-Hsiang and Ssu-Yun Chen, “Perceived Accessibility, Mobility, and Connectivity of Public Transportation Systems,” Transportation Research Part A, 2015, 77, 386–403. 11. Clark, Christopher F., Matthew J. Kotchen, and Michael R. Moore, “Internal and external influences on pro-environmental behavior: Participation in a green electricity program,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2003, 23, 237–246. 12. Daziano, Ricardo A. and Denis Bolduc, “Incorporating Pro-environmental Preferences to- wards Green Automobile Technologies through a Bayesian Hybrid Choice Model,” Transport- metrica A: Transport Science, 2013, 9 (1), 74–106. 13. Eren, Ezgi and Volkan Emre Uz, “A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand,” Sustainable Cities and Society, 2020, 54, 101882. 14. Faghih-Imani, Ahmadreza, Robert Hampshire, Lavanya Marla, and Naveen Eluru, “An Empirical Analysis of Bike Sharing Usage and Rebalancing: Evidence from Barcelona and Seville,” Transportation Research Part A, 2017, 97, 177–191. 15. Frade, Ines and Anabela Riberio, “Bicycle Sharing System Demand,” EWGT2013 16th Meet- ing of the EURO Working Group on Transportation, 2014, 111, 518–527. 16. Gale, John, IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage, IPCC, 2018. 17. Ge, Yan, Weina Qu, Huizi Qi, Xinyue Cui, and Xianghong Sun, “Why people like using bikesharing: Factors influencing bikeshare use in a Chinese sample,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2020, 87, 102520. 18. Heath, Yuko and Robert Gifford, “Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior: Predicting the Use of Public Transportation,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2002, 32 (10), 2154–2189. 19. Hensher, David A., John M. Rose, and William H. Greene, “Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer,” 2005. 20. Hess, Stephane, Mark Fowler, Thomas Adler, and Aniss Bahreinian, “A Joint Model for Vehicle Type and Fuel Type Choice: Evidence from a Cross-Nested Logit Study,” Transportation, 2012, 39, 593–625. 21. Hiratsuka, J., G. Perlaviciute, and L. Steg, “Testing VBN theory in Japan: Relationships between values, beliefs, norms, and acceptability and expected effects of a car pricing policy,” Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, feb 2018, 53, 74–83. 22. Hopkins, Debbie, “Can environmental awareness explain declining preference for car-based mo- bility amongst generation Y? A qualitative examination of learn to drive behaviours,” Trans- portation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, dec 2016, 94, 149–163. 23. Johansson, Maria Vredin, Tobias Heldt, and Per Johansson, “The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, jul 2006, 40 (6), 507–525. 24. Liere, Kent D. Van and Riley E. Dunlap, “Environmental Concern: Does it Make a Difference How it’s Measured?,” 1981, 13 (6), 651–676. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc. 25. Link, Christoph, Christoph Strasser, and Michael Hinterreiter, “Free-floating bikesharing in Vienna A user behaviour analysis,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 135, 168–182. 26. Liu, Diyi, Huibin Du, Frank Southworth, and Shoufeng Ma, “The influence of social- psychological factors on the intention to choose low-carbon travel modes in Tianjin, China,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, nov 2017, 105, 42–53. 27. Mateo-Babiano, Iderlina, SameeraKumar, and AlvinMejiab, “Bicycle sharing in Asia: a stakeholder perception and possible futures,” Transportation Research Procedia, 2017. 28. Meng, Meng, Andreas Rau, and Hita Mahardhika, “Public transport travel time perception: Effects of socioeconomic characteristics, trip characteristics and facility usage,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2018, 114, 24–37. 29. Merchn, Daniel, Matthias Winkenbach, and Andr Snoeck, “Quantifying the impact of urban road networks on the efficiency of local trips,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2020, 135, 38–62. 30. Midgley, Peter, “Bicycle-Sharing Schemes: Enhancing Sustainabile Mobility in Urban Areas,” 31. Commission on Sustainable Development Nineteenth Session, 2011, p. 2011. 32. Nilsson, Maria and Rikard Kueller, “Travel behaviour and environmental concern,” Trans- portation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, May 2000, 5 (3), 211–234. 33. Nordfjærn, Trond, Hans Brende Lind, zlem S¸im¸seko˘glu, Stig Halvard Jørgensen, In- gunn Olea Lund, and Torbjørn Rundmo, “The role of social cognition in perceived thresh- olds for transport mode change,” Transport Policy, nov 2019, 83, 88–96. 34. Nordlund, A., J. Jansson, and K. Westin, “Acceptability of electric vehicle aimed measures: Effects of norm activation, perceived justice and effectiveness,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, nov 2018, 117, 205–213. 35. Parkes, Stephen D., Greg Marsden, Susan A. Shaheen, and Adam P. Cohen, “Un- derstanding the Diffusion of Public Bikesharing Systems: Evidence from Europe and North America,” Journal of Transport Geography,, 2013, 31, 94–103. 36. Paulssen, Marcel, Dirk Temme, Akshay Vij, and Joan L. Walker, “Values, Attitudes and Travel Behavior: a Hierarchical Latent Variable Mixed Logit Model of Travel Mode Choice,” Transportation, 2014, 41, 873–888. 37. Peer, Stefanie, “To bike or not to bike? Evidence from a university relocation,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2019, 70, 49–69. 38. Peters, Luke and Don MacKenzie, “The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implica- tions for policy and system design,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2019, 130, 208–226. 39. Qian, Xiaodong and Deb Niemeier, “High impact prioritization of bikeshare program invest- ment to improve disadvantaged communities’ access to jobs and essential services,” Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 76, 52–70. 40. Regue, Robert and Will Recker, “Proactive Vehicle Routing with Inferred Demand to Solve the Bikesharing Rebalancing Problem,” Transportation Research Part E, 2014, 72, 192–209. 41. Shaheen, Susan A., Stacey Guzman, and Hua Zhang, “Bikesharing in Europe, the Amer- icas, and Asia: Past, Present, and Future,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010, p. 2143. 42. Si, Hongyun, Jian gang Shi, Guangdong Wu Jindao Chen, and Xianbo Zhao, “Mapping the Bike Sharing Research Published from 2010 to 2018: A Scientometric Review,” Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 213, 415–247. 43. Tang, Yang, Haixiao Pan, and Yibo Fei, “Research on Users Frequency of Ride in Shanghai Minhang Bikesharing System,” Transportation Research Procedia, 2017, pp. 4979–4987. 44. Tran, Tien Dung, Nicolas Ovtracht, and Bruno Faivre d’Arcier, “Modeling Bike Sharing System Using Built Environment Factors,” 7th Industrial Product-Service Systems Conference - PSS, industry transformation for sustainability and business, 2015, 30, 293–298. 45. Wang, Yacan, Ying Yang, Jiaping Wang, Matthew Douglas, and Duan Su, “Examin- ing the influence of social norms on orderly parking behavior of dockless bike-sharing users,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2021, 147, 284–296. 46. Whitmarsh, Lorraine and Saffron O’Neill, “Green identity, green living? The role of pro-environmental self-identity in determining consistency across diverse pro-environmental be- haviours,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, sep 2010, 30 (3), 305–314. 47. Yoo, Sunbin, Junya Kumagai, Yuta Kawabata, Alexander R. Keeley, and Shunsuke Managi, “Willingness to Buy and/or Pay Disparity: Evidence from Fully Autonomous Vehicles,” A Working paper, 2021. 48. Younes, Hannah, Arefeh Nasri, Giovanni Baiocchi, and Lei Zhang, “How transit service closures influence bikesharing demand; lessons learned from SafeTrack project in Washington, 49. D.C. metropolitan area,” Journal of Transport Geography, 2019, 76, 83–92. 50. Zawojska, Ewa, Anna Bartczak, and Mikoaj Czajkowski, “Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences,” Journal of Envi- ronmental Economics and Management, 2019, 93, 63–84. 51. Zhang, Yongping and Zhifu Mi, “Environmental Benefits of Bik Sharing: A Big Data-based Analysis,” Applied Energy, 2018, 220. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108312 |