Gerling, Charlotte and Wätzold, Frank (2019): Evaluating policy instruments for the conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Published in: Conservation Biology , Vol. 35, No. 3 (3 September 2020): pp. 824-833.
This is the latest version of this item.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95512.pdf Download (737kB) |
Abstract
Climate change is a key threat for biodiversity. In order to mitigate this threat, ecologists suggest two conservation strategies: (1) enabling a species’ migration towards areas that will become suitable for the species as climatic conditions change and (2) creating climate refugia in which the species may persist even if the surrounding landscape is no longer climatically ideal. The policy instruments that could be used to implement these conservation strategies have so far not been evaluated comprehensively from an economic perspective. We develop a conceptual evaluation framework with the criteria ecological effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and dynamic incentives, which are criteria commonly applied in the economic analysis of environmental policy instruments. For each criterion, we develop of a set of specific evaluation criteria to assess policy instruments for species conservation under climate change. We apply the framework by conducting a conceptual analysis of three types of policy instruments – land purchases, offsets and conservation payments. A key finding of our analysis is that the degree to which a policy instrument is appropriate for species conservation depends strongly on the conservation strategy chosen.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Evaluating policy instruments for the conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | ecological effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, dynamic incentives, enabling migration, climate refugia, habitat turnover, flexibility |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 108514 |
Depositing User: | Charlotte Gerling |
Date Deposited: | 30 Jun 2021 06:42 |
Last Modified: | 30 Jun 2021 06:42 |
References: | Aguiar, L.M.S., Bernard, E., Ribeiro, V., Machado, R.B. & Jones, G. (2016). Should I stay or should I go? Climate change effects on the future of Neotropical savannah bats. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5, 22-33. Ando, A.W. & Chen, X. (2011). Optimal contract lengths for voluntary ecosystem service provision with varied dynamic benefit functions. Conservation Letters, 4(3), 207-218. Ando, A.W. & Hannah, L. (2011). Lessons from finance for new land-conservation strategies given climate-change uncertainty. Conservation Biology, 25(2), 412-414. Ando, A.W. & Mallory, M.L. (2012). Optimal portfolio design to reduce climate-related conservation uncertainty in the Prairie Pothole Region. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(17), 6484-6489. Ay, J.S., Chakir, R., Doyen, L., Jiguet, F. & Leadley, P. (2014). Integrated models, scenarios and dynamics of climate, land use and common birds. Climatic Change, 126(1–2), 13–30. Bartkowski, B. & Bartke, S. (2018). Leverage points for governing agricultural soils: a review of empirical studies of European farmers’ decision-making. Sustainability, 10(9), 3179. Burton, R.J.F. & Schwarz, G. (2013). Result-oriented agri-environmental schemes in Europe and their potential for promoting behavioural change. Land Use Policy, 30, 628-641. Drechsler, M. (2017). Performance of input- and output-based payments for the conservation of mobile species. Ecological Economics, 134, 49-56. Drechsler, M., Johst, K. & Wätzold, F. (2017). The cost-effective length of contracts for payments to compensate land owners for biodiversity conservation measures. Biological Conservation, 207, 72-79. Endres, A. (2011). Environmental Economics – Theory and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Engel, S., Palmer, C., Taschini, L. & Urech, S. (2015). Conservation Payments under Uncertainty. Land Economics, 91(1), 36-56. Ferraro, P.J. (2008). Asymmetric information and contract design for payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics, 65(4), 810-821. Fox, J. & Nino-Murcia, A. (2005). Status of Species Conservation Banking in the United States. Conservation Biology, 19(4), 996-1007. Heller, N.E. & Zavaleta, E.S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142, 14-32. Hily, E., Drechsler, M. & Wätzold, F. (2017). Cost-effectiveness of conservation payment schemes under climate change. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/lef/wpaper/2017-01.html [12.07.2019]. Hily, E., Garcia, S., Stenger, A. & Tu, G. (2015). Assessing the cost-effectiveness of a biodiversity conservation policy: A bio-econometric analysis of Natura 2000 contracts in forest. Ecological Economics, 119, 197-208. Johst, K., Drechsler, M., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Hartig, F., Vos, C.C., Wissel, S., Wätzold, F. & Opdam, P. (2011). Biodiversity conservation in dynamic landscapes: trade‐offs between number, connectivity and turnover of habitat patches. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(5), 1227-1235. Jones, K.R., Watson, J.E.M., Possingham, H.P. & J. Klein, C.J. (2016). Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: A review. Biological Conservation, 194, 121–130. Kelly, K.E., Belcher, K., & Khakbazan, M. (2017). Economic Targeting of Agricultural Beneficial Management Practices to Address Phosphorus Runoff in Manitoba. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(1), 143-166. Krämer, J.E. & Wätzold, F. (2018). The agglomeration bonus in practice—An exploratory assessment of the Swiss network bonus. Journal for Nature Conservation, 43, 126-135. Krause, B. & Culmsee, H. (2013). The significance of habitat continuity and current management on the compositional and functional diversity of grasslands in the uplands of Lower Saxony, Germany. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 208(5-6), 299-311. Laycock, H., Moran, D., Smart, J., Raffaelli, D. & White, P. (2009). Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of conservation: The UK Biodiversity Action Plan. Biological Conservation, 142(12), 3120-3127. Lennox, G.D. & Armsworth, P.R. (2011). Suitability of short or long conservation contracts under ecological and socio-economic uncertainty. Ecological Modelling 222, 2856– 2866. Lewis, D.J. & Polasky, S. (2018). An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92, 20-34. Mackey, B.G., Watson, J.E.M., Hope, G. & Gilmore, S. (2008). Climate change, biodiversity conservation, and the role of protected areas: An Australian perspective, Biodiversity, 9(3-4), 11-18. Mallory, M.L. & Ando, A.W. (2014). Implementing efficient conservation portfolio design. Resource and Energy Economics, 38, 1-18. Mantyka-Pringle, C.S., Martin, T.G., Moffatt, D.B., Udy, J., Olley, J., Saxton, N., Sheldon, F., Bunn, S.E. & Rhodes, J.R. (2016). Prioritizing management actions for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity under changing climate and land-cover. Biological Conservation, 197, 80–89. Matzdorf, B. & Lorenz, J. (2010). How cost-effective are result-oriented agri-environmental measures?—An empirical analysis in Germany. Land Use Policy, 27(2), 535-544. MLUL Brandenburg (2017). Arbeitshilfe Betriebsintegrierte Kompensation. Retrieved from https://mlul.brandenburg.de/cms/media.php/lbm1.a.3310.de/Arbeitshilfe-Betriebsintegrierte-Kompensation.pdf [17.05.2019]. Mooney, H., Larigauderie, A., Cesario, M., Elmquist, T., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Lavore, S., Mace, G.M., Palmer, M., Scholes, R. & Yahara, T. (2009). Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(1), 46-54. OECD (2016). Biodiversity Offsets: Effective Design and Implementation, OECD Publishing: Paris. Oliver, T.H., Smithers, R.J., Beale, C.M. & Watts, K. (2016). Are existing biodiversity conservation strategies appropriate in a changing climate? Biological Conservation, 193, 17-26. Omann, I., Stocker, A. & Jäger, J. (2009). Climate change as a threat to biodiversity: An application of the DPSIR approach. Ecological Economics, 69(1), 24-31. Opdam, P. & Wascher, D. (2004). Climate change meets habitat fragmentation: linking landscape and biogeographical scale levels in research and conservation. Biological Conservation, 117(3), 285-297. Ovenden, G.N., Swash, A.R.H., & Smallshire, D. (1998). Agri‐environment schemes and their contribution to the conservation of biodiversity in England. Journal of Applied Ecology, 35(6), 966-960. Pearson, R.G., Dawson, T.P., Berry, P.M. & Harrison, P.A. (2002). SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species. Ecological Modelling, 154(3), 289-300. Rissman, A.R., Owley, J., Shaw, M.R., & Thompson, B.(B.) (2015). Adapting Conservation Easements to Climate Change. Conservation Letters, 8(1), 68-76. Robinson, J.G. (2011). Ethical pluralism, pragmatism, and sustainability in conservation practice. Biological Conservation, 144(3), 958-965. Russi, D., Margue, H., Oppermann, R. & Keenleyside, C. (2016). Result-based agri-environment measures: Market-based instruments, incentives or rewards? The case of Baden-Württemberg. Land Use Policy, 54, 69-77. Sala, O.E., Chapin, F.S., Armesto, J.J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R. & Leemans, R. (2000). Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287(5459), 1770-1774. Saura, S. Bodin, Ö. & Fortin, M.J. (2013). Stepping stones are crucial for species’ long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 171–182. Schöttker, O., Johst, K., Drechsler, M. & Wätzold, F. (2016): Land for biodiversity conservation – to buy or borrow?, Ecological Economics 129, 94-103. Schöttker, O. & Wätzold, F. (2018). Buy or lease land? Cost-effective conservation of an oligotrophic lake in a Natura 2000 area. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(6), 1327–1345. Schöttker, O. & Santos, M.J. (2019). Easement or public land? An economic analysis of different ownership modes for nature conservation measures in California. Conservation Letters. Shah, P., Mallory, M.L., Ando, A.W. & Guntenspergen, G.R. (2016). Fine-resolution conservation planning with limited climate-change information. Conservation Biology, 31(2), 278–289. Singer, A., Johst, K., Banitz, T., Fowler, M.S., Groeneveld, J., Gutiérrez, A.G., Hartig, F., Krug, R.M., Liess, M., Matlack, G., Meyer, K.M., Pe'er, G., Radchuk, V., Voinopol-Sassu, A.-J. & Travis, J.M.J. (2016). Community dynamics under environmental change: How can next generation mechanistic models improve projections of species distributions? Ecological Modelling 326, 63-74. Strange, N., Thorsen, J.T., Bladt, J., Wilson, K.A., & Rahbek, C (2011). Conservation policies and planning under climate change. Biological Conservation, 144(12), 2968-2977. Tainio, A., Heikkinen, R.K., Heliölä, J., Hunt, A., Watkiss, P., Fronzek, S., Leikola, N., Lötjönen, S., Mashkina, O. & Carter, T.R. (2016). Conservation of grassland butterflies in Finland under a changing climate. Regional Environmental Change, 16(1), 71–84. Theesfeld, I. (2010). Institutional Challenges for National Groundwater Governance: Policies and Issues. Groundwater, 48(1), 131-142. Urban, M. C., Bocedi, G., Hendry, A.P., Mihoub, J.B., Pe'er, G., Singer, A., Bridle, J.R., Crozier, L.G., De Meester, L., Godsoe, W., Gonzalez, A., Hellmann, J.J., Holt, R.D., Huth, A., Johst, K., Krug, C.B., Leadley, P.W., Palmer, S.C.F., Pantel, J.H., Schmitz, A., Zollner, P.A. & Travis, J.M.J. (2016). Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353(6304), aad8466. Vos, C.C., Berry, P., Opdam, P., Baveco, H., Nijhof, B., O’Hanley, J., Bell, C. & Kuipers, H. (2008). Adapting landscapes to climate change: examples of climate-proof ecosystem networks and priority adaptation zones. Journal of Applied Ecology 45, 1722-1731. Wätzold, F. (2014). Climate Change Adaptation and Biodiversity Conservation: An Economic Perspective. In E. Albrecht, M. Schmidt, M. Mißler-Behr, S. Spyra (Eds.). Implementing Adaptation Strategies by Legal, Economic and Planning Instruments on Climate Change, 187 – 195. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag Wätzold, F. & Schwerdtner, K. (2005). Why be wasteful when preserving a valuable resource? A review article on the cost-effectiveness of European biodiversity conservation policy. Biological Conservation, 123(3), 327-338. Wintle, B.A., Bekessy, S.A., Keith, D.A., van Wilgen, B.W., Cabeza, M., Schröder, B., Carvalho, S.B., Falcucci, A., Maiorano, L., Regan, T.J., Rondinini, C., Boitani, L. & Possingham, H.P. (2011). Ecological–economic optimization of biodiversity conservation under climate change. Nature Climate Change, 1, 355–359. Wissel, S. & Wätzold, F. (2010). A conceptual analysis of the application of tradable permits to biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology, 24(2), 404-411. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108514 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Evaluating policy instruments for the conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. (deposited 22 Aug 2019 09:46)
- Evaluating policy instruments for the conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. (deposited 30 Jun 2021 06:42) [Currently Displayed]