Should the United States Rejoin the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal?

Itakura, Ken and Lee, Hiro (2021): Should the United States Rejoin the Trans-Pacific Trade Deal?

Abstract

Before the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) entered into force, the United States withdrew from the trade accord. Eleven other TPP signatories decided to revive the agreement, which led to the implementation of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for TPP (CPTPP). The objectives of this paper are to estimate economic welfare effects under alternative scenarios of TPP/CPTPP, to evaluate the extent of losses to the US from its withdrawal from TPP and expected gains from rejoining the Trans-Pacific trade accord, and to examine whether the US economy would have to undergo extensive sectoral adjustments from its participation. We employ a dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model to examine these issues. The results suggest that the US loses an opportunity to gain 0.4 percent in its economic welfare by withdrawing from TPP, but it would be able to recover most of its projected welfare gains by reengaging with CPTPP. Since sectoral output adjustments in the US are small, its adjustment costs from participation in CPTPP would be limited. In addition, there exist political incentives for the US to become a member of this trade accord.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: TPP, CPTPP, US, GTAP, CGE model
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F13 - Trade Policy ; International Trade Organizations; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F14 - Empirical Studies of Trade; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F17 - Trade Forecasting and Simulation

References

Aguiar, A., Chepeliev, M., Corong, E., McDougall, R., & van der Mensbrugghe, D. (2019). The GTAP data base: Version 10. Journal of Global Economic Analysis, 4(1): 1-27.

Ahn, J., Dabla-Norris, E., Duval, R., Hu, B., & Njie, L. (2019). Reassessing the productivity gains from trade liberalization. Review of International Economics, 27(1): 130-154.

Armington, P. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, 16: 159-178.

Chen, N., Imbs, J., & Scott, A. (2009). The dynamics of trade and competition. Journal of International Economics, 77: 50-62.

Deardorff, A.V. & Stern, R.M. (2011). The Michigan model of world production and trade. In: Stern, R.M., ed., Comparative Advantage, Growth, and the Gains from Trade and Globalization. London: World Scientific.

Eichengreen, B., Mehl, A., & Chiţu, L. (2021). Mars or Mercury redux: The geopolitics of bilateral trade agreements. The World Economy, 44(1): 21-44.

Ferrantino, M.J., Maliszewska, M., & Taran, S. (2020). Actual and potential trade agreements in the Asia-Pacific: Estimated effects. Policy Research Working Paper No. 9496, Washington, DC: World Bank.

Gilbert, J., Furusawa, T., & Scollay, R. (2018). The economic impact of the Trans-Pacific Partnership: What have we learned from CGE simulation? The World Economy, 41(3): 831-865.

Halpern, L., Koren, M., & Szeidl, A. (2015). Imported inputs and productivity. American Economic Review, 105(12): 3660-3703.

Hertel, T. W., ed. (1997). Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hinz, J. (2017). The ties that bind: Geopolitical motivations for economic integration. Kiel Working Paper No. 2085, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

Hummels, D.L. & Schaur, G. (2013). Time as a trade barrier. American Economic Review, 103(7): 2935-59.

Ianchovichina, E. & McDougall, R. (2012). Theoretical structure of dynamic GTAP. In: Ianchovichina, E. & Walmsley, T.L., eds., Dynamic Modeling and Applications for Global Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

International Monetary Fund (2021). World Economic Outlook Database, April 2021. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.

International Trade Centre (2016). Market access map (MAcMap) tariff rates for 2016-2046 between TPP member countries under the TPP agreement.

Laget, E., Osnago, A., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2020). Deep trade agreements and global value chains. Review of Industrial Organization, 57(2): 379-410.

Lee, H. & Itakura, K. (2018). The welfare and sectoral adjustment effects of mega-regional trade agreements on ASEAN countries. Journal of Asian Economics, 55: 20-32.

Li, C. & Whalley, J. (2021). Effects of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership. The World Economy, 44(5): 1312-1337.

Liu, X. & Ornelas, E. (2014). Free trade agreements and the consolidation of democracy. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(2): 29-70.

Minor, P. (2013). Time as a barrier to trade: A GTAP database of ad valorem trade time costs. ImpactEcon, Second Edition.

Petri, P.A. & Plummer, M.G. (2016). The economic effects of the TPP: New estimates. In: Cimino-Isaacs, C. & Schott, J.J., eds., Trans-Pacific Partnership: An Assessment. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

Petri, P.A., Plummer, M.G., & Zhai, F. (2012). Trans-Pacific Partnership and Asia-Pacific Integration: A Quantitative Assessment. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute of International Economics.

Trefler, D. (2004). The long and short of the Canada-U.S. Free Trade Agreement. American Economic Review, 94(4): 870-895.

United Nations (2019). World Population Prospects: The 2019 Revision. Department of Economics and Social Affairs, Population Division. New York: United Nations.

United States International Trade Commission (USITC) (2016). Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement: Likely Impact on the U.S. Economy and on Specific Industry Sectors. Washington, DC: USITC.

Walmsley, T., McDougall, R. & Ianchovichina, E. (2012). Welfare analysis in the dynamic GTAP model. In: Ianchovichina, E. & Walmsley, T.L., eds., Dynamic Modeling and Applications for Global Economic Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, Z., Mohan, S., & Rosen, D. (2009). Methodology for estimating services trade barriers. Rhodium Group and Peterson Institute for International Economics.

World Bank (2016). Potential macroeconomic implications of the Trans-Pacific Partnership. In: Global Economic Prospects: Spillovers amid Weak Growth. Washington, DC: World Bank.