Pollution, partial privatization and the effect of ambient charges

Ohnishi, Kazuhiro (2021): Pollution, partial privatization and the effect of ambient charges.

Abstract

This paper examines a mixed Cournot duopoly model comprising a private firm and a partially privatized public firm to reassess the effect of an increase in ambient charges, and demonstrates that the result of this study is about the same as that obtained from private Cournot duopoly competition.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: ambient charge; Cournot duopoly; environmental regulation; partial privatization; pollution
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D21 - Firm Behavior: Theory; L - Industrial Organization > L3 - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise > L33 - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprises and Nonprofit Institutions ; Privatization ; Contracting Out; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Artz, B., Heywood, J.S., McGinty, M., 2009. The merger paradox in a mixed oligopoly. Research in Economics 63 (1), 1-10.

Buccella, D, Fanti, L, Gori, L., 2021. To abate, or not to abate? A strategic approach on green production in Cournot and Bertrand duopolies. Energy Economics 96, 105164.

Chang, W. W., 2005. Optimal trade and privatization policies in an international duopoly with cost asymmetry. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 14 (1), 19-42.

Chen, T. L., 2017. Privatization and efficiency: a mixed oligopoly approach. Journal of Economics 120 (3), 251–268.

Chao, C. C., Yu, E. S. H., 2006. Partial privatization, foreign competition, and optimal tariff. Review of International Economics 14 (1), 87-92.

Fershtman, C., 1990. The interdependence between ownership status and market structure: The case of privatization, Economica 57 (227), 319-328.

Fridman, A., 2018. Partial privatization in an exhaustible resource industry. Journal of Economics 124 (2), 159–173.

Ganguli, S., Raju, S., 2012. Perverse environmental effects of ambient charges in a Bertrand duopoly. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 1(3), 289-296.

Heywood, J. S., Hu, X., Ye, G., 2017. Optimal partial privatization with asymmetric demand information. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 173 (2), 347–375.

Heywood, J. S., Ye, G., 2010. Optimal privatization in a mixed duopoly with consistent conjectures. Journal of Economics 101 (3), 231-246.

Lu, Y., Poddar, S., 2007. Firm ownership, product differentiation and welfare. The Manchester School 75 (2), 210-217.

Matsumoto, A., Szidarovszky, F., 2021. Effective ambient charges on non-point source pollution in a two-stage Bertrand duopoly. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 10 (1), 74-89.

Matsumura, T., 1998. Partial privatization in mixed duopoly. Journal of Public Economics 70 (3), 473-483.

Ohnishi, K., 2010. Partial privatization in price-setting mixed duopoly. Economics Bulletin 30 (1), 309-314.

Ohnishi, K., 2016. Partial privatization in international mixed duopoly with price competition. Hellenic Open Business Administration Journal 2 (1), 57-65.

Poe, G. L., Schulze, W. D., Segerson, K., Suter, J. F., Vossler, C. A., 2004. Exploring the performance of ambient based policy instruments when nonpoint source polluters can cooperate. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (5), 1203-1210.

Saha, B., Sensarma, R., 2008. The distributive role of managerial incentives in a mixed duopoly. Economics Bulletin 12 (27), 1-10.

Sato, H., 2017. Pollution from Cournot duopoly industry and the effect of ambient charges. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy 6 (3), 305-308.

Scrimitore, M., 2014. Quantity competition vs. price competition under optimal subsidy in a mixed oligopoly. Economic Modelling 42 (C), 166-176.

Segerson, K., 1988. Uncertainty and incentives for nonpoint pollution control. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 15 (1), 87-98.

Suter, J. F., Vossler, C. A., Poe, G. L., Segerson, K., 2008. Experiments on damage-based ambient taxes for nonpoint source polluters. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90 (1), 86-102.

Wang, L. F. S., Lee, J. Y., 2010. Partial privatization, foreign competition, and tariffs ranking. Economics Bulletin 30 (3), 2405-2412.

Wang, L. F. S., Wang, Y., Zhao, L., 2009. Privatization and the environment in a mixed duopoly with pollution abatement. Economics Bulletin 29 (4), 3112-3119.

Xepapadeas, A. P., 1991. Environmental policy under imperfect information: incentives and moral hazard. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 20, 113–126.

Xepapadeas, A. P., 1992. Environmental policy design and dynamic non-point source pollution. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 23, 22–39.

Xepapadeas, A. P., 1995. Observability and choice of instrument mix in the control of externalities. Journal of Public Economics 56, 485–498.