Jain, Satish (2020): The Strong Consistency of Neutral and Monotonic Binary Social Decision Rules.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_109657.pdf Download (224kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strong consistency of neutral and monotonic binary social decision rules. Individuals are assumed to satisfy von Neumann-Morgenstern axioms of individual rationality. The main result of the paper shows that there does not exist any neutral and monotonic non-null non-dictatorial binary social decision rule which is strongly consistent. The relationship between restricted preferences and the existence of strong equilibria is also investigated. It is shown that for every non-dictatorial social decision function satisfying the conditions of independence of irrelevant alternatives, neutrality, monotonicity and weak Pareto-criterion there exists a profile of individual orderings satisfying value-restriction corresponding to which there is no strong equilibrium.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Strong Consistency of Neutral and Monotonic Binary Social Decision Rules |
English Title: | The Strong Consistency of Neutral and Monotonic Binary Social Decision Rules |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Binary Social Decision Rules, Strong Consistency, Neutrality, Monotonicity, Value-Restricted Preferences |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations |
Item ID: | 109657 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Satish Jain |
Date Deposited: | 10 Sep 2021 12:06 |
Last Modified: | 10 Sep 2021 12:06 |
References: | Arrow, K.J. (1963), Social Choice and Individual Values, second edition, Wiley, New York. Danilov, V.I. and Sotskov, A.I. (1993), `On strongly consistent social choice functions', Journal of Mathematical Economics, 22, 327-346. Dutta, B. (1980), `On the possibility of consistent voting procedures', Review of Economic Studies, 47, 603-16. Farquharson, R. (1969), Theory of Voting, Basil Blackwell, Oxford. Gibbard, A. (1969), `Intransitive social indifference and the Arrow dilemma', unpublished manuscript. Gibbard, A. (1973), `Manipulation of voting schemes: A general result', Econometrica 41, 587-601. Jain, S.K. (1987), `Maximal conditions for transitivity and monotonic binary social decision rules', The Economic Studies Quarterly, 38, 124-30. Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. (1957), Games and Decisions, Wiley, New York. Oren, I. (1981), `The structure of exactly strongly consistent social choice functions', Journal of Mathematical Economics, 8, 207-20. Moulin, H. (1983), The Strategy of Social Choice, North-Holland, Amsterdam. Peleg, B. (1978), `Consistent voting systems', Econometrica, 46, 153-61. Peleg, B. (1984), Game-Theoretic Analysis of Voting in Committees, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Satterthwaite, M.A. (1975), `Strategy-proofness and Arrow's conditions: Existence and correspondence theorems for voting procedures and social welfare functions', Journal of Economic Theory, 10, 187-217. Sen, A.K. (1970), Collective Choice and Social Welfare, Holden-Day, San Francisco. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/109657 |