Van, Germinal and Barbosa Valdiosera, Emilio (2021): COVID Government-Aid Programs and Wealth Creation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_110565.pdf Download (300kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of COVID government-aid programs on wealth creation. When the pandemic spread to the US, the economy shut down. The lockdown compelled state governments across the United States to enforce shelter-in-place policies. As a result, unemployment surged, and many government-aid programs were created to help working-class families survive through the lockdown since the economy was at a standstill. Those whose political leanings favor the Democratic Party and Progressive Movements have argued that the COVID government-aid programs contributed to creating wealth, increased GDP growth, and increased the consumers’ income and consumption. Those more sympathetic to the Free-Market view argue that these relief programs did not contribute much to the creation of wealth but only increased government spending. In testing this hypothesis, to whether know if COVID government-aid programs contributed or not to the creation of wealth, we found that the impact of these programs on wealth creation was statistically significant but only a weak percentage of the variation of these COVID government programs could explain the variation in wealth creation, which lead us to infer that the impact of COVID government-aid programs only had a very minor role in the creation of wealth. We, therefore, concluded that the COVID government-aid programs did contribute more to guarantee a safety net for the working-class rather than creating wealth from which everyone could benefit.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | COVID Government-Aid Programs and Wealth Creation |
English Title: | COVID Government-Aid Programs and Wealth Creation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Econometrics, Economic Analysis, Statistical Modeling, Regression Analysis, Applied Economics, Multiple Regression |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C21 - Cross-Sectional Models ; Spatial Models ; Treatment Effect Models ; Quantile Regressions E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E21 - Consumption ; Saving ; Wealth |
Item ID: | 110565 |
Depositing User: | Mr. Germinal Van |
Date Deposited: | 11 Nov 2021 03:25 |
Last Modified: | 11 Nov 2021 03:25 |
References: | 1. Hulse, Carl; Cochrane, Emily. (March 26, 2020). “As Coronavirus Spread, Largest Stimulus in History United a Polarized Senate.” The New York Times. 2. Sauter, Michael. (February 15, 2021). “Coronavirus stimulus check: Here’s how many people will get $1,200 in every state.” USA Today. 3. Analysts. (2021). “Spending to Date for 22 major COVID-19 Programs.” Department of the U.S. Treasury. 4. Wealth creation refers to one’s basket of assets; cash, land property, gold, shares, bonds all added together. For investors, wealth is created by buying or investing in these assets with an expectation that the price will move higher. 5. Gilberstadt, Hannah. “More Americans Oppose than Favor the Government Providing a Universal Basic Income for All Adult Citizens.” Pew Research Center, 19 Aug. 2020, www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/08/19/more-americans-oppose-than-favor-the-government-providing-a-universal-basic-income-for-all-adult-citizens/ 6. The Good and the Bad in Remittance Flows - Iza World of Labor. https://wol.iza.org/uploads/articles/97/pdfs/good- and-bad-in-remittance-flows.pdf. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/110565 |