Cassandra's Curse: A Second Tragedy of the Commons

Colo, Philippe (2021): Cassandra's Curse: A Second Tragedy of the Commons.

Abstract

This paper studies why scientific forecasts regarding exceptional or rare events generally fail to trigger adequate public response. A major example is climate change: despite years of scientific reporting, public acceptance of economic regulations is still limited. Building on the main causes identified by surveys for these reluctances, this paper offers an explanatory mechanism for this paradox. I consider a game of contribution to a public bad: greenhouse gases emissions. Prior to that, contributors receive expert advice regarding climate damages. Because of climate science's complexity, experts' forecasts are non-verifiable. In addition, I assume that the expert cares only about social welfare. Under mild assumptions, I show that no information transmission can happen at equilibrium when the number of contributors is high or the severity of climate damages is low. Then, contributors ignore scientific reports and act solely upon their prior belief.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Contribution to a public bad, Cheap talk, Climate change
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D62 - Externalities; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness

References

Angeletos, G.-M. and Pavan, A. (2007). Efficient use of information and social value of information. Econometrica, 75(4):1103–1142.

Asheim, G. B. (2010). Strategic use of environmental information. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46(2):207–216.

Bergstrom, T., Blume, L., and Varian, H. (1986). On the private provision of public goods. Journal of public economics, 29(1):25–49.

Crawford, V. P. and Sobel, J. (1982). Strategic information transmission. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1431–1451.

Douenne, T. and Fabre, A. (2020). French attitudes on climate change, carbon taxation and other climate policies. Ecological Economics, 169:106496.

Ehret, P. J., Van Boven, L., and Sherman, D. K. (2018). Partisan barriers to bipartisanship: Understanding climate policy polarization. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(3):308– 318.

Everett, J. A., Colombatto, C., Awad, E., Boggio, P., Bos, B., Brady, W. J., Chawla, M., Chituc, V., Chung, D., Drupp, M. A., et al. (2021). Moral dilemmas and trust in leaders during a global health crisis. Nature human behaviour, 5(8):1074–1088.

Fischer, A., Peters, V., Vávra, J., Neebe, M., and Megyesi, B. (2011). Energy use, climate change and folk psychology: Does sustainability have a chance? results from a qualitative study in five european countries. Global Environmental Change, 21(3):1025–1034.

Gabel, M., Gooblar, J., Roe, C. M., and Morris, J. C. (2021). The ideological divide in confidence in science and participation in medical research. Scientific reports, 11(1):1–9.

Galeotti, A., Ghiglino, C., and Squintani, F. (2013). Strategic information transmission networks. Journal of Economic Theory, 148(5):1751–1769.

Goltsman, M. and Pavlov, G. (2008). How to talk to multiple audiences.

Halady, I. R. and Rao, P. H. (2010). Does awareness to climate change lead to behavioral change? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management. 26

Hornsey, M. J., Lobera, J., and Díaz-Catalán, C. (2020). Vaccine hesitancy is strongly associated with distrust of conventional medicine, and only weakly associated with trust in alternative medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 255:113019.

Kakeu, J. and Johnson, E. P. (2018). Information exchange and transnational environmental problems. Environmental and Resource Economics, 71(2):583–604.

Lorenzoni, I. and Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and usa perspectives. Climatic change, 77(1):73–95.

Maestre-Andrés, S., Drews, S., and van den Bergh, J. (2019). Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature. Climate Policy, 19(9):1186–1204.

Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., and Allen, M. R. (2009). Greenhouse-gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2 c. Nature, 458(7242):1158–1162.

Pidgeon, N. and Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nature climate change, 1(1):35–41.

Slechten, A. (2020). Environmental agreements under asymmetric information. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 7(3):455–481.

Sterman, J. D. (2008). Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science, 322(5901):532–533.

Van Boven, L., Ehret, P. J., and Sherman, D. K. (2018). Psychological barriers to bipartisan public support for climate policy. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(4):492–507.

Whitmarsh, L. and Capstick, S. (2018). Perceptions of climate change. In Psychology and climate change, pages 13–33. Elsevier. 27