Estimating the Social Welfare Function of Amartya Sen for Latin America

John Michael, Riveros-Gavilanes (2020): Estimating the Social Welfare Function of Amartya Sen for Latin America. Published in: Ensayos de Economía , Vol. 31, No. 59 (August 2021): pp. 13-40.

Abstract

The present article establishes a set of empirical approximations related to the theorical formulation of the social welfare function of Sen applied to the Latin-American context between 1995 & 2018, this in order to provide estimates of the welfare trends derived from its original version and the generalized version proposed by Mukhopadhaya (2003a; 2003b). The article equally contributes exploring the long-run relationships among welfare, inequality and income with the panel data methodology. The results indicated that long-run relationships exists among these variables, a higher elasticity on the welfare comes from the income distribution rather than the economic growth, in the short-run, only the economic growth was significant to explain the welfare. Finally, for the Latin American countries the ranking of welfare was done considering the predicted values of welfare at country level with the linear predictions of the econometrical model of the long-run, which matches in terms of behavior and rank in the welfare with the original approach of Sen applied to Latin America.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Welfare; Inequality; Growth; Income; Latin America.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O57 - Comparative Studies of Countries

References

Anand, S. & Harris, C. (1994). Choosing a Welfare Indicator. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 226-231. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2117834?seq=1

Arrow, K. J. (1963). Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley. http://catalogo.econo.unlp.edu.ar/meran/opac-detail.pl?id1=5702#.YCXXu3lOnIU

Banco Mundial. (s. f.). World Development Indicators. Consultado el 10 de enero de 2020. https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators

Blackorby, C., Bossert, W., & Donaldson, D. (2002). Chapter 11. Utilitarianism and the Theory of Justice. En K. J. Arrow, A. K. Sen & K. Suzumura (eds.), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare Volume 1 (pp. 542-596). North Holland. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0110(02)80015-7

Bentham, J. (2000) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Batoche Books. (original publicado en 1781). https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/bentham/morals.pdf

Baluch, M. U. H. & Razi, S. (2007). Social Welfare Measurement in Pakistan: An Ordinal and Cardinal Approach. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 45(1), 55-88. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25825304?seq=1

Bergson, A. (1938). A Reformulation of Certain Aspects of Welfare Economics, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52(2), 310-334. https://doi.org/10.2307/1881737

Berman, Y., Ben-Jacob, E., & Shapira, Y. (2016). The Dynamics of Wealth Inequality and the Effect of Income Distribution. PLoS ONE, 11(4), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154196

Berrebi, Z. M., & Silber, J. (1987). Regional Differences and the Components of Growth and Inequality Change. Economics Letters, 25(3), 295-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90231-X

Bishop, J. A., Chakraborti, S., & Thistle, P. D. (2009). Practitioner's Corner: An Asymptotically Distribution‐Free Test for Sen's Welfare Index. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 52(1), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.1990.mp52001008.x

Chancel, L., Hough, A., & Voituriez, T. (2017). Reducing Inequalities within Countries: Assessing the Potential of the Sustainable Development Goals. Global Policy, 9(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12511

Cobham, A., Schlögl, L., & Sumner, A. (2016). Inequality and the Tails: the Palma Proposition and Ratio. Global Policy, 7(1), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12320

Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2646837

Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. J. (1987) Co-Integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251-276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236

Gasparini, L., & Weinschelbaum, F. (1991). Medidas de desigualdad en la distribución del ingreso: algunos ejercicios de aplicación. Económica, 37(1), 31-44. http://sedici.unlp.edu.ar/handle/10915/9352

Gasparini, L., & Sosa Escudero, W. (2001). Assessing Aggregate Welfare: Growth and Inequality in Argentina. Cuadernos de Economía, 38(113), 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-68212001011300002

Gründler, K., & Köllner, S. (2017). Determinants of Governmental Redistribution: Income Distribution, Development Levels, and The Role of Perceptions. Journal of Comparative Economics, 45(4), 930-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.10.007

Hoechle, D. (2007). Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions, with Cross-Sectional Dependence. The Stata Journal, 7(3), 281-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X0700700301

Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7

Karakitsos, E., & Varnavides, L. (2014). Maritime Economics: A macroeconomic Approach. Springer.

Kao, C. (1999). Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2

Levin, A., Lin, C. F., & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7

Madsen, E. (2005). Estimating Cointegrating Relations from a Cross Section. The Econometrics Journal, 8(3), 380–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1368-423X.2005.00170.x

McCoskey, S., & Kao, C. (1998). A Residual-based Test of the Null of Cointegration in Panel Data. Econometric Reviews, 17(1), 57-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939808800403

McGillivray, M., & Markova, N. (2010). Global Inequality in Well-being Dimensions. The Journal of Development Studies, 46(2), 371-378. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380903033280

Milanovic, B. (2013). Global Income Inequality in Numbers: In History and Now. Global Policy, 4(2), 198-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12032

Mukhopadhaya, P. (2001a). A Generalized Social Welfare Function, Its Decomposition and Application [NUS Working Paper 0119]. http://www.fas.nus.edu.sg/ecs/pub/wp/wp0119.pdf

Mukhopadhaya, P. (2001b). A Generalized Social Welfare Function and its Disaggregation by Components of Income: The Method and Application [NUS Working Paper 0121]. http://www.fas.nus. edu.sg/ecs/pub/wp/wp0121.pdf

Mukhopadhaya, P. (2003a). A Generalized Social Welfare Function and Its Disaggregation by Components of Income: The method and applications. En J. Bishop & Y. Amiel (eds.), Inequality, Welfare and Poverty: Theory and Measurement (Research on Economic Inequality Volume 9 (pp. 245-264). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1049-2585(03)09012-4

Mukhopadhaya, P. (2003b). The Ordinal and Cardinal Judgment of Social Welfare Change in Singapore, 1982-99. The Developing Economies, 61(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2003.tb00930.x

Mukhopadhaya, P. (2014). Income Inequality in Singapore. Routledge.

Mill, J. S. (2001). Utilitarianism. Batoche Books. (original publicado en 1863). https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/mill/utilitarianism.pdf

Ndamsa, T. D., Njang, G., & Baye, F. M. (2020). Social Welfare Consequences of the Radius of Employment Decency. Athens Journal of Business & Economics, 6(3). 211-238. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajbe.6-3-3

Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 653-670. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653

Piketty, T. (2013). El capital en siglo XXI. Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). (2019). Panorama general Informe sobre Desarrollo Humano 2019. Más allá del ingreso, más allá de los promedios, más allá del presente: desigualdades del desarrollo humano en el siglo XXI. http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/hdr_2019_overview_-_spanish.pdf

Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (PNUD). (s. f.). Human Development Data (1990-2018). Consultado el 11 de mayo de 2020. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data

Roberts, K. W. S. (1980). Possibility Theorems with Interpersonally Comparable Welfare Levels. Review of Economic Studies, 47(2), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297001

Tomaszewicz, L., & Trębska, J. (2015). The Role of General Government in the Income Redistribution in the Polish Economy. Journal of International Studies, 8(2), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2015/8-2/8

Sen, A. K. (1974). Informational Bases of Alternative Welfare Approaches: Aggregation of Income Distribution. Journal of Public Economics, 3(4), 387-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2727(74)90006-1

Sen, A. K. (1976) Real National Income. The Review of Economic Studies, 43(1), 19-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296597

Wooldridge, J. M. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press.

Zhang, L. (2007) Political Economy of Income Distribution Dynamics. Journal of Development Economics, 87(1), 119-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.11.005